Hi misc@,
I'm trying to get a load balancer based on OpenBSD 5.0 and relayd running
according to
http://undeadly.org/cgi?action=article&sid=20080617010016
The special thing about the setup is that my customer runs two NATting
(Linux-based) load balancers himself, using public 123.45.67.0/24 ad
Hi list,
happy new year!
Watching the log file, I see sometimes lines like this:
Jan 2 07:51:19 rt-beta bgpd[4344]: change req for 38.21.12.48/25: not in table
I didn't find any clue what happens here; I found the part of source code,
where 'change req for' can be seen, but I don't really und
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Mon, 2 Jan 2012 12:43:45 +0100
> Von: Henning Brauer
> An: misc@openbsd.org
> Betreff: Re: openbgpd: change req not in table
> * Donald Reichert [2012-01-02 08:04]:
> > Watching the log file, I see sometimes lines like this:
>
Hi list,
I'd like to replace some Ciscos by OpenBSD machines.
On the routers I have configured the possibility to span networks from our own
AS over peerings, Cisco speak: neighbor x.x.x.x allowas-in
This is needed for disjunct networks.
I didn't find a clue how to do this with OpenBGPd - any
Thanks a lot for your multiple answers; I'll talk to our Cisco guru in order to
see what would be the best solution here.
Thanks again!
Donald
> --
> :wq Claudio
>
> > /Pete
> >
> >
> > On 6. jan. 2012, at 22:01, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> >
> &g
Hi list,
I have some trouble integrating ospfd into our Cisco network.
Using a pretty vanilla ospfd.conf (due to ip.forwarding set to "0" during test
period, this machine automatically is announced as a stub router -- I like the
way developers think ahead! :) I can use 'auth-type none' as well
> Hi list,
Sorry for the noise -- Cisco config was wrong.
Thanks,
Donald
> I have some trouble integrating ospfd into our Cisco network.
>
> Using a pretty vanilla ospfd.conf (due to ip.forwarding set to "0" during
> test period, this machine automatically is announced as a stub router -- I
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Thu, 13 Oct 2011 12:14:20 +0200
> Von: David Coppa
> An: misc@openbsd.org
> Betreff: Dennis Ritchie
> Today is a sad sad day :(
>
> Rest in Peace.
> Without you, we would never be here.
>
> Cheers,
> David
He died last weekend. RIP.
#include
int
Hi,
I'd like to use a non-zero (0 seconds is default) timeout for src.track on a
load balancer powered by relayd.
However, I'd like to set it *not* as a global pf setting, but per rule. AFAICS,
I have to configure this in relayd.conf, but where? If it's possible at all,
that is.
Thank you,
D
Hi list,
I'm preparing a pair of new servers, each equipped with a bunch of NICs in
order to replace some Cisco gear doing BGP and friends.
What puzzles me right now is how to configure the stuff HD-wise. I have two
SSDs in each of the machines, my initial planning was to do some RAID-1 in
ord
Hello list,
I know, 4.6 has been out for a while now... However, I run 4.5 (i386) on a pair
of very heavily used load balancers (relayd), and due to some customer
requirements I would need some statistics (traffic, etc).
I thought of using Net-SNMP, but a guy in IRC told me that in OpenBSD 4.5
> > I know, 4.6 has been out for a while now... However, I run 4.5
> (i386) on a pair of very heavily used load balancers (relayd), and
> due to some customer requirements I would need some statistics
> (traffic, etc).
> >
> > I thought of using Net-SNMP, but a guy in IRC told me that in
> OpenBSD
Hi list,
I'm planning to replace a GNU/Linux-driven load balancer (heartbeat,
ldirectord) by an OpenBSD setup using pf, pfsync, and relayd.
However, I discovered that I need 'weighting' (at least that is what it's
called in ldirectord).
For example, I have ten web servers to spread the load on
13 matches
Mail list logo
