Does relayd(8) support TLS Server Name Initiation?

And if not is support planned? I'd like to make use of relayd's relays for URL based filtering of https requests. I already know for SSL2 I'm stuck to 1 IP address per cert. A scan of the relayd.conf(5) and ssl(8) and the daily change logs for 4.6 through current all say no, but for all I know som

machine-dependent tweaks to /usr/src/etc

On Wed, 2010-10-13 at 19:47 -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote: > There has been talk about going thourgh /usr/src/etc and building > machine-dependent (that means "architecture-dependent" for those of > you who are not on The Team) variations for this. > > People who dug into this got scared and didn't

Re: nfsv4?

On Wed, 2010-10-27 at 15:28 -0700, James A. Peltier wrote: > I deal with research data. Most of which are tens to hundreds of gigabytes in > size, so it's not a solution for me, but we did evaluate that for some > smaller scale uses. > > Our users are used to typing cd /cs/ and having their fil

Re: nfsv4?

On Wed, 2010-10-27 at 14:26 -0700, James A. Peltier wrote: > - Original Message - > | You mean, NFSv4 seems more "transparent" to you (whatever that means) > | than, say, NFSv2? > > No, in that NFSv4 with Kerberos was an easier move from NFSv3 than to move to > something like AFS, which

Re: Architeture Choose

On Fri, 2010-11-05 at 14:30 -0400, Joe McDonagh wrote: > "If your Sun fails" <-- that's a big IF. It's approaching a possibility > of 0 in my experience. > > If performance isn't an issue and stability is your chief goal, none of > this hardware is as stable as a Sun. Not quite my experience. I

Re: OT: Disadvantages of using virtual firewalls like OpenBSd

On Tue, 2010-11-23 at 15:28 -0500, Brad Tilley wrote: > Nick Holland wrote: > > > what's changed? > > Layering? Nope. > > Crappy programming? Nope. > > Better hardware? not really. > > Features-before-security? Nope. > > Good points. The goals of virtualization are, easy management, power > sa

Re: OpenBSD with PHP and MySQL

On Thu, 2011-01-06 at 10:43 -0500, Ben Adams wrote: > I know OpenBSD is built for security. > Using OpenBSD with bigmem on Mysql and PHP (No need for apache) machine. > How much of a preformance difference is there from FreeBSD?? > Looking for % or TBS or QBS. > > Machines will be mini 1U. > one Q

Re: pf and DNS

On Fri, 2011-01-07 at 16:26 +0530, Girish Venkatachalam wrote: > On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 2:43 PM, Martin Schrvder wrote: > >> > >> And consequently pf which does not know a thing about domains does not help > us. > > > > What exactly is the problem you want to solve? > > > > Sorry for having been