Justin H Haynes wrote:
> Thanks Nick Holmes and misc for
> http://www.openbsdsupport.org/GalleryInChroot.html. It was very
> helpful in getting Gallery working in OpenBSD in the chrooted Apache
> environment for me. However, I need to use an external smtp server to
> handle registration emails.
Joachim Schipper wrote:
>I'm afraid this'll result in lots of questions on [EMAIL PROTECTED] I, for one,
>would be stumped as to why I'd want OpenNIC.
>
No particular reason. I just needed someone for the sake of example,
and they're the ones who sprang to mind. My use of them was in no way
an i
Gaby vanhegan wrote:
>There are sites on this machine that we've had since 2000, and that
>were running on various insecure os' from there before we made the
>move to OpenBSD. I suspect that it would be a medium/large sized
>task to make these sites work under chroot, as well as reorganise
Giancarlo Razzolini wrote:
> Hello folks,
>
>I finally did took some time and did my pf.conf firewall from scratch,
>actually learning it (i did my first using fwbuilder. It worked, but i
>wanted to do a "hands on" approach). And know i must say i'm almost
>proficient in pf. I must confess i
Giancarlo Razzolini wrote:
>Thanks for the prompt reply. I had some luck yesterday with altq. I've
>put 300kb as bandwidht limit in my internal iface and 150Kb in my
>external iface. And assigned traffic to the download queue (300Kb) and
>it worked. The only problem is that i'm using keep state in
Rob W wrote:
>> From: Chris Zakelj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> This is a denial of service, not a security exploit. Crashing a box
>> causes headaches, but the data within is still out of the reach of those
>> who would like to steal it.
>
> It isn't importan
Joe S wrote:
> Be careful with Soekris. While DSL speed is stuck at 1.5 MB for you,
> many users are getting 6MB and higher is some parts of the world. It
> would not be advantageous to buy something like a soekris and grow out
> of it in 2 years when your ISP gets around to offering REAL speeds.
H
Alexander Farber wrote:
> And there is also ipcheck.py
>
> On 2/6/06, Keith Richardson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> This will handle the pesty case of your IP changing.
>>
>> 1. dyndns.org - get a free subdomain to map to your IP.
>> 2. ddclient package - updates your DNS whenever your IP cha
uv negativa wrote:
> Hi all,
> Well, i need some help!
> what is the best Wireless hardware supported on openbsd?
>
> I think I'll buy one wireless with chipset ath, but in the manual says
>
> Revision A1 of the D-LINK DWL-G520 and DWL-G650 are based on an Intersil
> PrismGT chip and are not
kyle wrote:
> Im having trouble finding out if(I'm sure it does) the pf.conf supports
> interface ranges and how to implement it. Right now, I have an ugly rule
> that specifies each interface(tun0, tun1, tun2, etc..). If I somehow missed
> this in some documentation, please feel free to tell me to
A Rossi wrote:
> Hi,
> I've been hired by a client to perform a number of network services
> for him, most of which are completely unrelated to my topic.
> Now, onto my topic:
> He asked me if I could partition all of his workstation computers
> (running windows XP Professional SP2) with a windows
With the upcoming 3.7 release, I took a look at the -current manpage for
pppoe(4). It looks straight-forward enough once you have things set up,
but I didn't see answers to two things on my mind...
1. Will users be able to use it during floppy installs, or will an
intermediate device (cdrom, n
With 3.7 released, I figured this would be a great time to add wifi
ability to my firewall. Being a good boy, I checked the HCL at
http://www.openbsd.org/i386.html to see which cards I should look for at
my local retailers. Several were in stock, so I grabbed one and
installed, only to find that
d
rewarding Atheros/Ralink/Realtek for opening up their chip docs.
Chris Zakelj wrote:
With 3.7 released, I figured this would be a great time to add wifi
ability to my firewall. Being a good boy, I checked the HCL at
http://www.openbsd.org/i386.html to see which cards I should look for a
Chris Zakelj wrote:
I should probably add that I did check the archives, where the
solutions tended to point towards "Just buy an access point, they're
just as cheap." I would (they're around), but that defeats the intent
of learning how to do it, trying to reduce underde
Ok, this probably isn't too big a surprise to frequent readers, but I'm
having trouble with the new kernelized pppoe. From the console messages
below, it looks like it's "dialing" (for lack of a better term) and
logging in successfully:
May 23 00:42:47 bbhhs96 /bsd: pppoe0: phase establish
Ma
Jason Ackley wrote:
On Mon, 23 May 2005, Chris Zakelj wrote:
Ok, this probably isn't too big a surprise to frequent readers, but I'm
having trouble with the new kernelized pppoe. From the console messages
below, it looks like it's "dialing" (for lack of a bet
Jason Ackley wrote:
Is this something that you are able to repeat? E.g. Simply does not work
without the debug flag and comes up as soon as you add it?
(just trying to make sure it is the same thing that I have seen)
Getting it working for me didn't include the 'debug' statement... it
appears
Adam Gleave wrote:
Just to point something out...
-
# route show
Routing tables
Internet:
DestinationGatewayFlagsRefs UseMtu Interface
default0.0.0.1UGS 0 3757 - pppoe0
0.0.0.1defaultUH
Can Erkin Acar wrote:
Theo de Raadt wrote:
[snip]
2. Will hostname.pppoe be able to handle special cases like Jens' #
character in the username without any special devices, will quotes
(single, double, or otherwise) handle it, or will those people need to
rely on the userland driver for t
Can Erkin Acar wrote:
I can't see any problem report about this in my inbox
(which is quite a mess nowadays, so it is equally likely
that I missed it),
If you can spare some time to send me pppoe debug outputs,
tcpdumps with & without the debug flag, and if possible
logs/dumps from the cisco si
Ok, I thought I installed everything, but maybe not, because my 3.7
install doesn't have hostapd(8). So, doing a bit of googling, it looks
like the initial commit was on 4/13, which I think was somewhere around
the time 3.7 was frozen. So... did hostapd(8) just miss being included
in RELEASE,
Chris Zakelj wrote:
Ok, I thought I installed everything, but maybe not, because my 3.7
install doesn't have hostapd(8). So, doing a bit of googling, it
looks like the initial commit was on 4/13, which I think was somewhere
around the time 3.7 was frozen. So... did hostapd(8) just
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 2:20 PM, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> Kevin Chadwick wrote:
>
> [SpinRite]
> > Takes for ever though but is easy to use and may recover partial
> > sectors automatically too ;-)
>
> I really wonder how it's going to do that.
>
It reads the questionable sector(s) a couple
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 3:03 PM, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> Chris Zakelj:
>
> > > [SpinRite]
> > > > Takes for ever though but is easy to use and may recover partial
> > > > sectors automatically too ;-)
> > >
> > > I really wonder how
1. Any particular reason your systems have not been updated in at least
three years?
2. Kernel defaults are generally chosen for a reason. Unless you have
evidence of resource exhaustion, turning knobs generally won't make things
better, and could make them worse.
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 12:31
101 - 126 of 126 matches
Mail list logo
