Hi devs and all,
I have been using spamd for quite a while and have been loving it.
I've seen that spamd currently only supports ipv4 and have been
wondering if it was possible to extend it to ipv6. I know that workforce
is always limited so I wanted to know if there is anyway to contribute
help
Thanks a lot Ingo.
I'm currently looking through spamd.c and trying to learn.
I'm way too far behind to send any patches yet, lol.
I'll slowly work to it.
Much appreciated,
Aisha
On 4/3/20 9:40 AM, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
> Hi Aisha,
>
> Aisha Tammy wrote on Fri, Apr 03,
Oh that is really good to hear :)
Thanks a lot phessler!
Here is to hoping it can be included in the next release.
Thanks a lot again,
Aisha
On 4/3/20 12:28 PM, Denis Fondras wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 03, 2020 at 08:54:22AM -0400, Aisha Tammy wrote:
>> Hi devs and all,
>> I have b
wooosh
wine is not there on openbsd
its not going to be there on openbsd
reasons are too long for me to write this early in the morning, plz google-fu
them
On 4/11/20 8:32 AM, Nikita Stepanov wrote:
> I mean�
> https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wine_(software)
> 18:30, 11 апреля 2020 г., Peter
Hey devs and all,
I'm kind of new to OpenBSD, only working on ports so far so take
what I say with chill.
I've been reading the source code in GIT and felt a real lack of comments
explaining what the code is doing. Is this something encouraged in obsd?
I would really like to have something more
Thanks a lot for responding, I've had some food so am feeling a lot less
frustrated :D
> On 4/23/20 12:10 PM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>
> It's often considered better if code is clear enough to stand by itself,
> keeping comments for the less common cases which can't be figured out
> from reading
Hey all,
I'm hoping to port jitsi and wanted to know if anyone else is already working
on a port so
that I don't do work that might be unnecessary.
Cheers,
Aisha
based af
will do
On 4/24/20 8:36 AM, Daniel Jakots wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Apr 2020 08:25:51 -0400, Aisha Tammy
> wrote:
>
>> Hey all,
>> I'm hoping to port jitsi and wanted to know if anyone else is already
>> working on a port so that I don't do work that mi
On 4/28/20 9:22 AM, David Demelier wrote:
> Le 28/04/2020 à 14:01, Yury Grebenkin a écrit :
>> OpenBSD gives a better sound experience on my machine than several
>> Linux distributions I have used and FreeBSD. Just want to say thank
>> you to all the people involved and state the fact that OpenBS
On 5/6/20 9:58 AM, infoomatic wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I realized wireguard is not available as binary package for i386. Since
> this is my only 32bit machine I would setup 32bit VM to build the
> package.
There are two packages wireguard-tools and wireguard-go
Both have been recently updated to work on
On 5/6/20 12:22 PM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2020-05-06, infoomatic wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I realized wireguard is not available as binary package for i386. Since
>> this is my only 32bit machine I would setup 32bit VM to build the
>> package. Is it possible to compile it from ports for 32bit? (o
On 5/7/20 11:11 AM, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
> On 2020-05-07 14:10, Consus wrote:
>> On Thu, May 07, 2020 at 04:00:15PM +0200, i...@aulix.com wrote:
>>> Dear OpenBSD fans,
>>>
>>> Can you please comment negative appraisal from the following website:
>>>
>>> https://isopenbsdsecu.re/quotes/
>>>
>>> I d
On 5/7/20 7:02 PM, Aaron Mason wrote:
> On Fri, May 8, 2020 at 2:30 AM jeanfrancois wrote:
>>
>> As long as there's no material published it's worth just any other word.
>>
>
> To quote Douglas Adams on whether you can trust people on the
> internet, "of course not, it's just people talking".
>
On 5/8/20 3:16 PM, Martin wrote:
> Which 'quantum' resistant algorithms can be used right now to prevent data
> decryption in future by 'quantum' computers (when they can do this) of
> currently collected data flows?
this is so dumb.
worry about this when there are computers which can actuall
On 5/15/20 5:00 AM, fossfo...@unixism.xyz wrote:
> Well as it turns out, my key was intact :)
>
> As it turns out, my passphrase didn't actually change at all, and
> every time I tried to enter it, I was in dvorak mode, where I typed
> it in qwerty originally. This will doubtlessly be my embarras
Hi all,
Is there any particular reason why ldapd has its own version of btree.c
instead of using the db.h standard btree ?
Aisha
On 6/10/20 10:46 AM, Steve Williams wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Do you have the proper ioctls to set baud rate, parity, start bits, stop bits
> so that the serial port is configured correctly?
>
> What about flow control? rts/cts, xon/xoff.
>
> Dealing with a serial port is it's own art.
>
Wow, this is
On 6/10/20 1:10 PM, Steve Williams wrote:
> On 10/06/2020 10:31 a.m., Aisha Tammy wrote:
>> On 6/10/20 10:46 AM, Steve Williams wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Do you have the proper ioctls to set baud rate, parity, start bits, stop
>>> bits so that the seri
I'm trying to get roundcube setup on my server and everytime I try to connect
to dovecot, it gives a weird error on roundcubes side, in errors.log:
[08-Jul-2020 21:34:18 +]: <6q9plqno> IMAP Error: Login failed for
ai...@aisha.cc against imap.aisha.cc from 10.7.0.1(X-Forwarded-For:
98.109.25
just add a small note?
Aisha
On 7/8/20 8:57 PM, Aisha Tammy wrote:
> I'm trying to get roundcube setup on my server and everytime I try to connect
> to dovecot, it gives a weird error on roundcubes side, in errors.log:
>
> [08-Jul-2020 21:34:18 +]: <6q9plqno> IMAP
The basic question is per the subject line, filling in the details here
I have wireguard working with each peer having ipv4 and ipv6 addresses
and all of them are able to ping each other and also to the WAN through
the central peer.
The central peer is a vultr VPS and has a /64 prefix
Hi all,
I'm having some trouble getting wireguard to work nicely.
Goal: Try to give public ipv6 addresses to my wireguard peers.
How I've tried to tackle it is by giving the ip6 to the peer and
then adding a route to the peer for the ipv6.
My vps (peer A) has ipv6 subet - 2001:19f0:5:5cd5::0/6
On 8/25/20 3:27 PM, Aisha Tammy wrote:
> Hi all,
> I'm having some trouble getting wireguard to work nicely.
>
> Goal: Try to give public ipv6 addresses to my wireguard peers.
>
> How I've tried to tackle it is by giving the ip6 to the peer and
> then adding a
On 8/27/20 7:07 AM, Simon Fryer wrote:
> All,
>
> On Thu, 27 Aug 2020 at 08:17, Alarig Le Lay wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Tue 25 Aug 2020 15:27:27 GMT, Aisha Tammy wrote:
>>> (peer A)$ tcpdump -inet6 -i vio0 icmp6
>>> 15:23:04.918459 fe80::fc00:2ff
On 10/15/20 5:52 AM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2020-10-14, Rafael Possamai wrote:
>>> I'm supporting a small business who needs more bandwidth due to the
>>> work-from-home >situation. They've asked me to help them do the upgrade to
>>> 10Gbe. I'd preferto keep them on an >OpenBSD router, sin
Hi,
I just upgraded to 6.8 and the upgrade process has been super cool and simple
:)
Unfortunately I seem to have hit some weird issue in OpenSMTPD where it has
stopped
delivering the mail using Dovecots LMTP due to sending as wrong user.
osmtpd tries to send the mail as *_smtpd* even when c
On 10/19/20 12:20 AM, Kastus Shchuka wrote:
On Sun, Oct 18, 2020 at 08:55:16PM -0400, Aisha Tammy wrote:
Hi,
I just upgraded to 6.8 and the upgrade process has been super cool and simple
:)
Unfortunately I seem to have hit some weird issue in OpenSMTPD where it has
stopped
delivering the
On 10/19/20 1:18 PM, Chris Bennett wrote:
On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 06:24:47AM -0400, Aisha Tammy wrote:
On 10/19/20 12:20 AM, Kastus Shchuka wrote:
On Sun, Oct 18, 2020 at 08:55:16PM -0400, Aisha Tammy wrote:
Hi,
I just upgraded to 6.8 and the upgrade process has been super cool and
Hi,
I'm wondering why the upgrade guide at
https://www.openbsd.org/faq/upgrade68.html
doesn't contain more list of files to remove.
Sysclean gives out a lot more names, but I haven't removed them yet cuz I
trust the upgrade guide more as it is crosschecked by humans.
But was still curious
On 11/29/20 7:09 PM, Ed Ahlsen-Girard wrote:
> I've had a couple of panics:
>
> mtx(something) (address)
> locking against myself
>
>
> in the last
> couple of days. The most recent address was 0x821c63c8
>
> How do this get tracked down? No core files from anything in the
> applicable
On 12/1/20 1:31 AM, Martijn van Duren wrote:
> Hello,
>
> There is table_ldap in the opensmtpd-extras package, but I've never used
> it, it's undocumented and I've heard that the author sees it as a proof
> of concept only at this point. So no idea how far this will take you,
> but it's your best s
Hi,
I was trying to create a small standalone portable version of the imsg
utilities
for linux and I managed to get it compiling (yea!!) and have put it on github
[1].
It is also working with trivial test cases that I manually generated.
For completeness, I was also trying to find regression te
On 12/12/20 6:18 PM, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
> Hi Aisha,
>
> Aisha Tammy wrote on Sat, Dec 12, 2020 at 05:40:14PM -0500:
>
>> I was trying to create a small standalone portable version of the
>> imsg utilities for linux and I managed to get it compiling (yea!!)
>>
Hi all,
I'm trying to give my wireguard peer a global IPv4 and IPv6.
The IPv6 is working fine, but the IPv4 doesn't work.
My VPS host (frantech) has provided me with two IPv4s,
198.98.53.194 (main IP through dhcp) and 198.98.61.217
which I can get on my vio0 interface with the configuration
/e
afaik spamd(8) does not support ipv6 (yet).
I also do not know if there is any ongoing effort for ipv6 to be added.
On 5/12/21 9:24 AM, Martin wrote:
Hi list,
I can't find in spamd(8) how to enable IPv6 listener in addition to IPv4 one.
Is it possible to set spamd(8) to listen on both IPv4 and
On 5/13/21 3:14 PM, Rafael Possamai wrote:
Has anyone tried to get something like this to work?
I dont get why it works for a while and then suddenly stops working!?
Not with hacky ARP entries. I'd see if Frantech can get you a routed /30 or /29
with your main v4 address as next hop. It's essen
Has been reported previously -
https://github.com/OpenSMTPD/OpenSMTPD/issues/1115
The link also contains a workaround which may be useful for you.
Best,
Aisha
On 9/12/21 5:28 PM, Simon Hoffmann wrote:
Hey yall,
in my smtpd.conf file I have "relay smtps://host.domain.tld"
host.domain.tld does
37 matches
Mail list logo
