On 11 Jun 2017, Donald Allen wrote:
> On 11 June 2017 at 19:16, Davor Balder wrote:
>
> They are not everyone's cup of tea, but I use a tiling window manager
> with OpenBSD (I like xmonad, but there are other choices: dwm, i3,
> awesome; there's also spectrwm, written originally, I believe, by
>
Je 2017-06-12 07:45, Rupert Gallagher skribis:
On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 1:16 AM, Davor Balder
wrote:
xfce is available and you should be able to use mac-like shortcuts
there. I think this relates to your chaoice of window manager/desktop
environment. We have choices!
Using xfce already, but
Hello,
fivering...@yahoo.com.au (Steve), 2017.06.07 (Wed) 15:23 (CEST):
> Hello,
> If I include :
> accept from local for any relay as "@domain.com"
> in smtpd.comnf on 6.1 release the reply to address is rewritten as
> u...@domain.com but the from address is left as u...@host.domain.com.
> Do
On 2017-06-11, Asbel Kiprop wrote:
> Hello
> After todays update my Dokuwiki just throw 500 error "There is no suitable
> CSPRNG installed on your system". Googled a bit and found out it because i
> have no /dev/urandom in my basedir,
> And this kinda obvious cuz i have httpd chrooted by default
>
On 2017-06-11, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> Also, you could "cp /etc/passwd urandom" and it will work fine
> also!
It won't in this case. They're using ParagonIE's random_* compat
library which was written by someone with a functioning brain.
On 2017-06-11, tomr wrote:
>
> On 06/11/17 11:53, lvdd wrote:
>> On Sun, 11 Jun 2017 09:42:15 -0600
>> "Theo de Raadt" wrote:
>>
is somebody messing with the graphics stack by any chance?
>>>
>>> It is probably rude to call steps-being-taken-toward-progress "messing"
>>>
>>>
>>
>> I am s
On 2017-06-12, jungle boogie wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I'm attempting to fetch the latest bsd.rd snapshot, but it's failing
> because of the ocsp response.
>
> $ ftp https://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/snapshots/amd64/bsd.rd
> Trying 129.128.5.191...
> Requesting https://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/sn
Re: iridium
Nice try, but my FF scores much better results.
I will dig into iridium's source next weekend.
R
On 12 June 2017 at 03:02, Anthony Campbell wrote:
> On 11 Jun 2017, Donald Allen wrote:
>> On 11 June 2017 at 19:16, Davor Balder wrote:
>>
>> They are not everyone's cup of tea, but I use a tiling window manager
>> with OpenBSD (I like xmonad, but there are other choices: dwm, i3,
>> awesome; th
On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 15:11 +1000, David Gwynne wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 09, 2017 at 07:19:34PM +0200, Bj??rn Ketelaars wrote:
> > On Fri 09/06/2017 12:07, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> > > On 08/06/17(Thu) 20:38, Bj??rn Ketelaars wrote:
> > > > On Thu 08/06/2017 16:55, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> > > > > On
On Mon 12/06/2017 15:11, David Gwynne wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 09, 2017 at 07:19:34PM +0200, Bj??rn Ketelaars wrote:
> > On Fri 09/06/2017 12:07, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> > > On 08/06/17(Thu) 20:38, Bj??rn Ketelaars wrote:
> > > > On Thu 08/06/2017 16:55, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> > > > > On 07/06/17(We
On 12 June 2017 at 01:14, Davor Balder wrote:
> Hello Martin,
>
> It may be worth upgrading from USB just in case...
Adding to this (good) suggestion. I would download the install61.fs
image and check it with sha256 against the 6.1 sha256 file to be sure
the bits arrived intact. Possible explana
> is somebody messing with the graphics stack by any chance?
Too much linux mailing list reading will eventualy distort your language.
On 2017-06-12, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2017-06-11, Asbel Kiprop wrote:
>> Hello
>> After todays update my Dokuwiki just throw 500 error "There is no suitable
>> CSPRNG installed on your system". Googled a bit and found out it because i
>> have no /dev/urandom in my basedir,
>> And this kinda
of course Soul_of_Root
On 06/09/2017 04:39 PM, SOUL_OF_ROOT 55 wrote:
> Can I use OpenBSD as a desktop system?
On 12 June 2017 at 03:28, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2017-06-12, jungle boogie wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I'm attempting to fetch the latest bsd.rd snapshot, but it's failing
>> because of the ocsp response.
>>
>> $ ftp https://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/snapshots/amd64/bsd.rd
>> Trying 129.128.5
Context:
A windows 10 pro client connects to openbsd nfs shared folder using username
and password on the openbsd system.
/etc/exports contains
/exports/Shared -mapall=nobody:shared [client-ip]
permissions:
drwxr-xr-x root wheel exports/
drwxrwxr-x nobody staff exports/Shared/
user is a member
create and delete here is based on directory permissions.
edit is presumably based on file permissions.
That said, generally speaking, windows permissions are incredibly
complex and (as a result) mostly ignored. [There will be a few people
who will deny this, but as a general rule most people den
On Sat, 10 Jun 2017, G wrote:
> I would say it depends.
>
> 1. What are your requirements
>
> -Do you need to propriety programs like Skype?
> Skype don't run on openbsd
It looks like Skype can be used from Chrome as an extension added from the
web store. I haven't tried it.
Telegram works on
Errata:
> /etc/exports contains
> /exports/Shared -mapall=nobody:shared [client-ip]
Correction:
/exports/Shared -mapall=nobody:staff [client-ip]
On Sun, 11 Jun 2017, Rupert Gallagher wrote:
> I spent yesterday and today installing 6.1 from scratch on a Dell
> Optiplex gx620. The machine has a pentium 4 @3.0GHz with 4GB non ECC
> RAM, returning a passmark of 354*. The aim is to replace the
> accountant's windows 10 pro tomorrow morning, mo
On problem 2,
if a user has group write permission on a folder, it has permission to write
its own files and those of same group membership in that folder, provided the
group permission is set on the file by its owner. If a file belongs to me and I
deny write permission to group and other, then
... a security problem.
Sent from ProtonMail Mobile
Ok, look...
Your problem 1: all windows files are executable because the windows
model for executable or not is proprietary and not supportable. It's
also not clear why you should care about this in a shared directory.
Your problem 2: if we assume that a shared directory (rather than user
specifi
p.s. if you do not want windows files in that shared directory to be
executable, I think you can mount the nfs backing store partition
noexec.
I haven't tested this, though - I mostly try to avoid networked file systems.
Thanks,
--
Raul
On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 1:22 PM, Raul Miller wrote:
> Ok
eri...@colossus.gruver.net (Eric Johnson), 2017.06.13 (Tue) 12:23 (CEST):
>
>
> On Sat, 10 Jun 2017, G wrote:
>
> > I would say it depends.
> >
> > 1. What are your requirements
> >
> > -Do you need to propriety programs like Skype?
> > Skype don't run on openbsd
>
> It looks like Skype can be
I think the problem is how windows mounts the nfs folder by default (right
click on "this computer" then select to attach a network folder to a drive
letter). The following article by Microsoft describes the mount option
"fileaccess" to set a default umask:
https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/l
On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 9:26 PM, Marcus MERIGHI wrote:
> eri...@colossus.gruver.net (Eric Johnson), 2017.06.13 (Tue) 12:23 (CEST):
...
>> >
>> > -Do you need to propriety programs like Skype?
>> > Skype don't run on openbsd
>>
>> It looks like Skype can be used from Chrome as an extension added
> I'd suggest installing a "User Agent Switcher"
I'd suggest installing Windows and since it is not an OpenBSD issue,
let M$ deal with that.
You have a very odd idea of "security". Probably though, this is the
wrong mailing list for what you are trying to do.
Good luck,
--
Raul
On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 2:27 PM, Rupert Gallagher wrote:
> I think the problem is how windows mounts the nfs folder by default (right
> click on "this com
Hi,
I had the same problem with 6.1 on Alix 2D13 boards, I've created a bridge0
interface with vr0, vr1, vr2 and athn0 (the wireless one configured in hostap
mode) but no ip address was given to any of the wifi connected devices by my
dhcp server.
However, all the computers linked with an ethe
I run mine with xfce works great
On June 12, 2017 7:45:13 AM GMT+02:00, Rupert Gallagher
wrote:
>On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 1:16 AM, Davor Balder
>wrote:
>
>> xfce is available and you should be able to use mac-like shortcuts
>there. I think this relates to your chaoice of window manager/desktop
>
Yes I though about it but I didn't care that much. My webcam don't work
on openbsd anyway. Can you make video calls?
On 06/12/17 22:55, Shteryana Shopova wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 9:26 PM, Marcus MERIGHI wrote:
>> eri...@colossus.gruver.net (Eric Johnson), 2017.06.13 (Tue) 12:23 (CEST):
>
TL;DR
How in your experience is the battery runtime of the thinkpad x240 on
current compared to Linux with TLP?
Dear OpenBSD devs and users,
I am using OpenBSD for most of my servers since around 5.6 now and I
absolutely love it.
However, I have not used OpenBSD on a notebook so far.
Now that I
I am currently trying to use virtualenv in my home directory to setup
different python environments but was met with the following error
[Errno 13] Permission denied. This happened using both virtualenv and
virtualenv-3.
After looking through /var/log/messages I found that the problem was
caused b
> So my question is, will there be any security implications that I
> should be concerned about with setting wxallowed in /etc/fstab to the
> home mountpoint?
Yes there is a security implication. From mount(8),
wxallowed Processes that ask for memory to be made writeable
If a non-root user can delete a root owned file with read-only permissions,
then there is a security problem. Good luck to you if you are thinking
otherwise.
The windows nfs umask solves the problem of writing files to both user and
group. It certainly does not solve the above security problem.
>> So my question is, will there be any security implications that I
>> should be concerned about with setting wxallowed in /etc/fstab to the
>> home mountpoint?
>
> Yes there is a security implication. From mount(8),
>
> wxallowed Processes that ask for memory to be made writeable
>
On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 01:24:19AM -0400, Rupert Gallagher wrote:
> If a non-root user can delete a root owned file with read-only permissions,
> then there is a security problem. Good luck to you if you are thinking
> otherwise.
This is not how unix permissions work. The directory permissions
2017-06-13 7:29 GMT+02:00 Josh Stephens :
> >> So my question is, will there be any security implications that I
> >> should be concerned about with setting wxallowed in /etc/fstab to the
> >> home mountpoint?
> >
> > Yes there is a security implication. From mount(8),
> > Turn it off and accept t
just a short head up,
192.43.244.163 got added to the 666 community again if anyone ist
wondering why mails from the list dont show up.
regards
--
Markus Rosjatfon: +49 351 8107223mail: ros...@ghweb.de
G+H Webservice GbR Gorzolla, Herrmann
Königsbrücker Str. 70, 01099 Dresden
http:/
Hi:
I recently got an x270 at work. It is very nice and I hope to be able
to use OpenBSD on it.
Fortunately, the latest snapshot supports the wireless card via iwm0
(thanks!).
em0 shows the error about "Unable to initialize the hardware". I guess
this will be fixed in upcoming snapshots (and
I don't see that on either server. Can you send me the output of
"bgpctl show rib detail 192.43.244.163"? Is it actually coming from a
different list?
On 2017 Jun 13 (Tue) at 08:00:05 +0200 (+0200), Markus Rosjat wrote:
:just a short head up,
:
:192.43.244.163 got added to the 666 community aga
43 matches
Mail list logo
