Hello!
When will the httpd have HTTP/2 support in OpenBSD?
Endpoints, webservers and the devices/networs between the two points would
greatly benefit from HTTP/2.
Faster and less traffic.
Thanks.
On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 02:51:47AM BST, Steven Schneider wrote:
> Hi @misc,
>
> I've noticed that bsd.rd wants to download the install base packages from
> /pub/OpenBSD/6.1/i386. Is this an error or some sort of alias for the path
> to the snapshots of the install base? bsd.rd seems to find the in
On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 09:14:10AM +0200, Marina Ala wrote:
> Hello!
>
> When will the httpd have HTTP/2 support in OpenBSD?
>
> Endpoints, webservers and the devices/networs between the two points would
> greatly benefit from HTTP/2.
>
> Faster and less traffic.
>
> Thanks.
>
Isn't QUIC
UDP servers listening? would that open possibility for massive DOSes?
Sent: Friday, March 31, 2017 at 12:14 PM
From: "Reyk Floeter"
To: "Marina Ala"
Cc: "OpenBSD Misc"
Subject: Re: OpenBSD httpd and HTTP/2
On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 09:14:10AM +0200, Marina Ala wrote:
> Hello!
>
> When will the
Yes, that's the point of QUIC.
On 2017 Mar 31 (Fri) at 13:30:59 +0200 (+0200), Marina Ala wrote:
:UDP servers listening? would that open possibility for massive DOSes?
:
:
:Sent: Friday, March 31, 2017 at 12:14 PM
:From: "Reyk Floeter"
:To: "Marina Ala"
:Cc: "OpenBSD Misc"
:Subject: Re: OpenB
Hello,
Currently, there is no support for Skylake GPU, I just want to know if someone
is working on it.
If not, are there some technical difficulties to support this generation ? Or
nobody is working on it ?
Thanks
Regards
On Fri, 31 Mar 2017 12:14:34 +0200
Reyk Floeter wrote:
> Isn't QUIC the hot new thing now? It is UDP, so Google can reinvent
> TCP and turn even more of their browser into an OS-replacement ;)
Oh come on now, how else will Google be able to claim they are
inventing or innovating? What will they
Just so that the subject makes it clear. This info already made it in
various messages ont the mailing list.
Right now, if you install OpenBSD, it says 6.1 without beta.
So pkg_add will look for the release directory, and not find it yet
because it's not out yet.
pkg_add -Dsnap
will make pkg_ad
narvu...@tutanota.com wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Currently, there is no support for Skylake GPU, I just want to know if
> someone is working on it.
> If not, are there some technical difficulties to support this generation ? Or
> nobody is working on it ?
The technical difficulty is that upstream, the
Hello,
I am new to OpenBSD and am trying to install OpenBSD on my Dell laptop,
specifically Dell Inspiron 15-5558. When I boot the installation, the
kernel panics with pci_make_tag: bad request. I am able to install if I
disable acpi during boot though.
I am new to this, so if I forgot something
> So pkg_add will look for the release directory, and not find it yet because
> it's not out > yet.
Is PKG_PATH ignored then?
> until the release is done.
So this is for people wanting to install release only?
On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 10:28:42PM +0300, Mihai Popescu wrote:
> > So pkg_add will look for the release directory, and not find it yet because
> > it's not out > yet.
>
> Is PKG_PATH ignored then?
RTFM, I'm just making people aware of recent stuff that's fully documented.
> > until the release
I have an OpenBSD 5.9 and an OpenBSD 6.0 server each set up as email servers.
The v5.9 server adds a message-id header to outgoing emails, the v6.0 does
not. Looking at the change log for each release it states that for v5.9
"/Add Message-Id header if necessary/" and v6.0 "/Add missing date or
mess
Hello,
There is a typo in man page for xsetroot.
In section OPTIONS, there is '-verson' and I think it should be '-version'.
LD wrote:
> I don't use the submission port on either server, just port 25, but 5.9
> sends a message-id and 6.0 does not. What does "/if necessary/" mean for the
> 5.9 server? What is the deciding factor to make the header necessary? I
> would like the v6.0 server to send a message-id too, how do
I don't use the submission port on either server, just port 25, but 5.9
sends a message-id and 6.0 does not. What does "/if necessary/" mean for the
5.9 server? What is the deciding factor to make the header necessary? I
would like the v6.0 server to send a message-id too, how do I make
whatever-i
Thanks all for your help on this, much appreciated. Not an auspicious choice
of machine to start out on!
The sony's bios seems incapable of switching raid off, spent some time
toggling settings and retrying the install. Looks as if Paul's patch is the
next step.
Work took over during the week so
Hi,
I have a question about the recommended settings for /etc/malloc.conf.
I'm currently using JUC on my i386 laptop, just to see how the old beast
handles it. I hadn't noticed any significant performance issues though it
did crash Chromium because it was using memory it had just freed. On my
* Raf Czlonka [170401 00:15]:
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2017 09:13:57 +0100
From: Raf Czlonka
To: OpenBSD Misc
Subject: Re: Question about bsd.rd
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
User-Agent: Mutt/1.8.0 (2017-02-23)
Sender: owner-m...@openbsd.org
On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 02:51:47AM BST, Steve
On 03/29/17 05:51, Luke Small wrote:
> I thought I read that there is an arm7 based mobile device, but I can't
> find anything about it.
>
Not quite as tiny, but in more capable in almost every way are the
netbooks of a few years ago. In addition to being small and portable,
they can have real n
Has anybody achieved an installation of OpenBSD on this yet please?
Just curious whether it is worth the effort to try.
Regards - Damian
Pacific Engineering Systems International, 277-279 Broadway, Glebe NSW 2037
Ph:+61-2-8571-0847 .. Fx:+61-2-9692-9623 | unsolicited email not wanted here
Views
The man page for exports(5) claims that remote accesses by root will be mapped
to uid/gid -2:-2 unless overridden via the -maproot or -mapall options. But if
root creates a file the result is clearly different:
# touch test
# ls -alF
total 32
drwxrwxrwx 2 ken 999 512 Ap
> I have a question about the recommended settings for /etc/malloc.conf.
Well, by default we ship without the file.
> I'm currently using JUC on my i386 laptop, just to see how the old beast
> handles it. I hadn't noticed any significant performance issues though it
> did crash Chromium becau
Until I really wanted to mess with vmm(4) late last year (thus requiring me
to move to a more portly i5 laptop), my daily driver was a Toshiba NB305,
on which I've run OpenBSD since 2011. It still comes out to play whenever I
need excellent battery life and/or a light carry load-out. Everything fro
Isn't it a result of wrong assumptions based on developer's experience
with employer-provided high-end laptops and workstations? Like "oh,
i'm gonna to add this feature and that tweak here and it will be good
enough because any PC (around me, in the office) has 16 (ok, at least
8) Gb of RAM AND 100
25 matches
Mail list logo
