What is the use case ?
2016-09-03 4:15 GMT+02:00 Luke Small :
> wouldn't it be more secure to have a write, read, and execute capable paths
> lists in pledge()
>
--
Cordialement, Coues Ludovic
+336 148 743 42
Le 02/09/2016 à 23:28, Ryan Freeman a écrit :
On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 06:25:15PM +0200, Bastien Durel wrote:
Hello.
I upgraded my router to 6.0 yesterday, and now I got a panic each time
I reboot it.
Hi,
Did you happen to forget to do your pkg_add -u to upgrade packages? I
suspect it might
In pledge, presumably there will be an accessible paths list. Maybe you
grant a process root access, and you need to read a file which is only
granted by root access, and you need write access for another file, so the
pledge permissions reflect that. On the presumed current path, you would
leave wr
On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 05:02:07PM -0700, Aioi Yuuko wrote:
> Sorry, I was vague in my original email: What I meant was, I'm aware that
> there are ways of getting it off the command line; I'm mostly curious about
> getting it on my desktop so it's easy to glance at. Would my best bet be
> runni
2016-09-03 11:04 GMT+02:00 Luke Small :
>
>
> Sorry I was in the middle of something, but pledge can be a broad brush,
> unless you are dealing with one file, whether it is executed, read, or
> written and giving per process file permissions sounds pretty neat, and it
> might just be a little simp
On 2016-09-02, Martijn van Duren wrote:
> On 09/03/16 00:46, Aioi Yuuko wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm trying to wean myself off external packages as much as possible. Is
>> there a common, accepted way of viewing, for instance, battery life, with
>> only included programs?
>>
>
> It depends upon you
On 2016-09-03, ludovic coues wrote:
> What is the use case ?
More than "what is the use case" is needed here - a good start would be
a diff for 3 or 4 examples of existing programs in base showing how it would
be used to improve things.
On 2016-09-03, Bastien Durel wrote:
> Le 02/09/2016 à 23:28, Ryan Freeman a écrit :
>> On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 06:25:15PM +0200, Bastien Durel wrote:
>>> Hello.
>>>
>>> I upgraded my router to 6.0 yesterday, and now I got a panic each time
>>> I reboot it.
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Did you happen to forget
On 2016-09-02, Nick Gonella wrote:
> I'm currently trying to port some code from Linux and within the
> Makefile, there is a reference to the utility msgfmt(1). After some
> Googling, I found that this should come as a part of gettext(1), but I
> can't seem to find how to get msgfmt(1) on OpenBSD.
installed a fresh 6.0 AMD64 and tried to build 'stable' from source.
Here is what I did as 'root' (as described in:
http://www.openbsd.org/stable.html):
export CVSROOT=anon...@anoncvs1.ca.openbsd.org:/cvs
cd /usr; cvs checkout -P -rOPENBSD_6_0 src
# cd /usr/src/sys/arch/$(uname -m)/conf
# config
If a program requires studio, wpath, rpath, dns, and inet. It spawns
multiple threads. The socket binding thread is taken over, runs arbitrary
code that overflows a buffer of the thread listening to a pipe with rpath
and stdio permissions it reads the binary of an executable the company
wants to re
Teno Deuter wrote:
> installed a fresh 6.0 AMD64 and tried to build 'stable' from source.
>
> Here is what I did as 'root' (as described in:
> http://www.openbsd.org/stable.html):
>
> export CVSROOT=anon...@anoncvs1.ca.openbsd.org:/cvs
> cd /usr; cvs checkout -P -rOPENBSD_6_0 src
there's some re
Not a strong requirement.
> If a program requires studio, wpath, rpath, dns, and inet. It spawns
> multiple threads. The socket binding thread is taken over, runs arbitrary
> code that overflows a buffer of the thread listening to a pipe with rpath
> and stdio permissions it reads the binary of an
meaning I shall try at a later time?
Thank you
On Sat, Sep 3, 2016 at 12:40 PM, Ted Unangst wrote:
> Teno Deuter wrote:
>> installed a fresh 6.0 AMD64 and tried to build 'stable' from source.
>>
>> Here is what I did as 'root' (as described in:
>> http://www.openbsd.org/stable.html):
>>
>> expor
Wow, Luke you are the man.
> Probably right, if they were pushing strong release dates, they'd go with
> freebsd or linux
>
> On Sat, Sep 3, 2016, 05:44 Theo de Raadt wrote:
>
> > Not a strong requirement.
> >
> > > If a program requires studio, wpath, rpath, dns, and inet. It spawns
> > > mult
Split your program. Stricter privilege separation.
Replace thread with fork, you will have self contained program unit.
An overflow in one won't affect the other. And each piece will have
tighter pledge.
2016-09-03 12:37 GMT+02:00 Luke Small :
> If a program requires studio, wpath, rpath, dns, a
Hello Teno,
I have successfully updated five OpenBSD 5.9 to 6.0 on release day ,
following https://www.openbsd.org/faq/upgrade60.html
After, I rebuilt all them to stable branch from:
$ cd /usr
$ cvs -qd anon...@anoncvs.ca.openbsd.org:/cvs get -rOPENBSD_6_0 -P src
Was magical as expected.
Rega
On 09/03/16 12:40, Ted Unangst wrote:
> Teno Deuter wrote:
>> installed a fresh 6.0 AMD64 and tried to build 'stable' from source.
>>
>> Here is what I did as 'root' (as described in:
>> http://www.openbsd.org/stable.html):
>>
>> export CVSROOT=anon...@anoncvs1.ca.openbsd.org:/cvs
>> cd /usr; cvs c
Yes, the repos should be done with their surgery now. Please let us
know if you still see issues.
On 2016 Sep 03 (Sat) at 13:11:42 +0200 (+0200), Teno Deuter wrote:
:meaning I shall try at a later time?
:
:Thank you
:
:On Sat, Sep 3, 2016 at 12:40 PM, Ted Unangst wrote:
:> Teno Deuter wrote:
:>>
> Why?
good(?) news: sysmerge is gone in 6.0
but not removed by 5.9 to 6.0 uprade process.
On Sat, Sep 03, 2016 at 05:37:22PM +, Michal Bozon wrote:
> > Why?
>
> good(?) news: sysmerge is gone in 6.0
> but not removed by 5.9 to 6.0 uprade process.
>
I really have a hard time understanding what you're trying to point out.
Yes, systrace is gone, but it's an ordinary binary that doe
> good(?) news: sysmerge is gone in 6.0
> but not removed by 5.9 to 6.0 uprade process.
s/sysmerge/systrace/
> > good(?) news: sysmerge is gone in 6.0
> > but not removed by 5.9 to 6.0 uprade process.
> >
>
> I really have a hard time understanding what you're trying to point out.
>
> Yes, systrace is gone, but it's an ordinary binary that does no harm,
> feel free to remove it if it makes you feel bet
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 3, 2016, at 12:46 PM, Michal Bozon wrote:
>> good(?) news: sysmerge is gone in 6.0
>> but not removed by 5.9 to 6.0 uprade process.
>
> s/sysmerge/systrace/
>
pledge()
Hi,
Not sure if its a feature or a bug. ;-)
OpenBSD my.example.com 6.0 GENERIC.MP#2319 amd64
Relevant bit of /var/nsd/etc/nsd.conf:
ip-address: 10.1.2.3
$ cat /etc/hostname.vmx1
rdomain 1
inet 10.1.2.3 255.255.255.224
!route -T1 add default 10.1.2.65
The above yields :
Sep 3 18:35:40 my nsd
You have to start nsd in rdomain 1.
Von meinem Samsung Galaxy Smartphone gesendet.
Ursprüngliche Nachricht
Von: Bob Jones
Datum: 03.09.16 20:13 (GMT+01:00) An: misc@openbsd.org
Betreff: rdomain incompatible with NSD ? (OpenBSD 6)
I've got a Toshiba NB305 netbook that's been my daily-use laptop for more
than 6 years now. The last fresh install I did was OpenBSD 4.9-RELEASE in
early May 2011. I've been quite happy with how it works, and I've been
doing bsd.rd upgrades and M:Tier binary updates ever since.
There is a lot of s
pkg_delete -a El 3 sept. 2016 3:12 PM, Ax0n escribió:
>
> I've got a Toshiba NB305 netbook that's been my daily-use laptop for more
> than 6 years now. The last fresh install I did was OpenBSD 4.9-RELEASE in
> early May 2011. I've been quite happy with how it works, and I've been
> doing bsd.rd
On Sat, Sep 03, 2016 at 03:12:53PM -0500, Ax0n wrote:
> I've got a Toshiba NB305 netbook that's been my daily-use laptop for more
> than 6 years now. The last fresh install I did was OpenBSD 4.9-RELEASE in
> early May 2011. I've been quite happy with how it works, and I've been
> doing bsd.rd upgra
Thank you very much, all! Giving it a shot now.
On Sat, Sep 3, 2016, 16:35 Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado
wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 03, 2016 at 03:12:53PM -0500, Ax0n wrote:
> > I've got a Toshiba NB305 netbook that's been my daily-use laptop for more
> > than 6 years now. The last fresh install I di
if someone's interested, here a list of fs differences
between 6.0 upgraded from 5.9, and 6.0 install, i found,
with some obvious differences like smtpd spool or sysmerge
backups removed (amd64/qemu):
http://pastebin.com/raw/VPkdbvxy (text/plain)
(not pasting because of long lines)
hth
Bob Jones(r.a.n.d.o.m.d.e.v.4+openbsdm...@gmail.com) on 2016.09.03 19:11:41
+0100:
> Hi,
>
> Not sure if its a feature or a bug. ;-)
>
> OpenBSD my.example.com 6.0 GENERIC.MP#2319 amd64
>
> Relevant bit of /var/nsd/etc/nsd.conf:
> ip-address: 10.1.2.3
>
>
> $ cat /etc/hostname.vmx1
> rdomain
On 09/03/16 11:32, Harald Dunkel wrote:
On 09/03/16 12:40, Ted Unangst wrote:
Teno Deuter wrote:
installed a fresh 6.0 AMD64 and tried to build 'stable' from source.
Here is what I did as 'root' (as described in:
http://www.openbsd.org/stable.html):
export CVSROOT=anon...@anoncvs1.ca.openbsd.
33 matches
Mail list logo
