Ted Unangst wrote:
bytevolc...@safe-mail.net wrote:
I see where you are coming from, but what I am getting at is, where in
the POSIX standard does it say that it needs to be anywhere in the file
system at all? If it is shared memory, then surely this doesn't require
backing up.
Oh. It doesn't
On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 1:56 AM, wrote:
> Ted Unangst wrote:
>>
>> bytevolc...@safe-mail.net wrote:
>>>
>>> I see where you are coming from, but what I am getting at is, where in
>>> the POSIX standard does it say that it needs to be anywhere in the file
>>> system at all? If it is shared memory,
Philip Guenther wrote:
Well, I am amazed. I guess I just have to do some more investigation into
workarounds for this, as RAM-based tmpfs file systems will get full very
quickly with shared memory segments, and large segments result in high disk
activity when munmap() is called. And SysV shared
Theo Buehler wrote:
>$ jot -r -p 0 10 1 3 | sort -n | uniq -c
>33464 1
>33246 2
>33290 3
According to the man page, "in the absence of -p, the precision is the
greater of the numbers begin and end". Since both 1 and 3 have a
precision of zero, therefore I would expect your command:
jot -r -p
Hi,
I've been using easy-rsa on OpenBSD to manage rsa keys for OpenVPN for
years, but after I upgraded to 5.9 (and applied all the errata patches
up to 020_amap.patch.sig), I get an error when I try to create and sign
new certificate:
# ./easyrsa build-client-full test.example.org
Note: using Ea
Difan Zhao [difan.z...@pason.com] wrote:
> Hi Pierre,
>
> I just upgraded the soekris box to openbsd 5.9 however I am still having the
> problem setting the rtable...
>
This requires OpenBSD 6.0 which is not yet released. You can use snapshots at
http//ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/snapshots/am
Philippe Meunier wrote:
> jot -r 10 1 3 | sort -n | uniq -c
>
> which the man page clearly indicates should produce something like:
>
> 24950 1
> 50038 2
> 25012 3
>
> which is also more in line with the "generate random floating point
> number and truncate to even" mod
Thank you sir! So I probably just stick with my hacking approach and wait for
the 6.0. I see that will come in November so not too much waiting.
So any idea how the openvpn might start to support rtable or rdomain?
Thanks,
Difan
-Original Message-
From: Chris Cappuccio [mailto:ch...@nmed
Hi,
while debugging a problem with routing via GRE I figured
out I have to use `route add $LAN_A $GRE_REMOTE_A`
for the route going via gre0 but `route add -iface $LAN_B
$GRE_LOCAL_B` for a route via gre1. When I used `route
$LAN_B $GRE_REMOTE_B` packets for $LAN_B were
send via gre0 (and probab
On 15/07/16 22:34, Difan Zhao wrote:
Thank you sir! So I probably just stick with my hacking approach and wait for
the 6.0. I see that will come in November so not too much waiting.
So any idea how the openvpn might start to support rtable or rdomain?
Thanks,
Difan
OpeBSD -current (snapshots
Kapetanakis Giannis wrote:
On 15/07/16 22:34, Difan Zhao wrote:
Thank you sir! So I probably just stick with my hacking approach and
wait for
the 6.0. I see that will come in November so not too much waiting.
So any idea how the openvpn might start to support rtable or rdomain?
Thanks,
Difan
11 matches
Mail list logo