spamd not greylisting for the correct time

Hello, I noticed some strange behavior from spamd in 5.7-stable. It has been started with '-5 -S 15 -s 1 -G6:24:864' but it seems to add to the whitelist every server which connects for the second time, independently from the first parameter in -G. Here is an example: # zgrep 217.172.190.133

Ospf multiple areas not redistributing

Hi, have an issue with ospfd when using multiple areas and networks from area 10.0.30.0 not distributed to 0.0.0.0. eg excerpt from config area 0.0.0.0 { interface gre0 interface gre1 } area 10.0.30.0 { interface em0 } the network for em0 is 10.0.30.0/24 and is never seen in ospf routing t

Re: bluetooth keyboard [was:Re: Intel Edison]

(Was eaten by mailing list problems - resending.) ludovic coues wrote: > 2015-08-28 12:32 GMT+02:00 Quartz : > > Just out of curiosity, are there any plans to support bluetooth at > > some point in the future? > > From what I heard, there was some support in the past. But people > stopped to upda

Re: pf vs mp

Quartz wrote: > > On a more serious note, I don't see how one can actually buy faster > > single-core performance for this purpose. If the question was more > > detailed, describing specific models of machines, we'd be able to > > show it makes no financial sense. The cheapest stuff is good enoug

Re: pf vs mp

Em 01-09-2015 22:40, Quartz escreveu: > And when I say "fanless" I mean *completely* fanless, there won't even > be any fans in the chassis or power supply, so low TDP is super > important, and that ends up meaning low performance. It's not clear to > me yet how close to the margin we'll end up bei

Re: Ospf multiple areas not redistributing

On 09/02/2015 10:31 AM, Roger Skjetlein wrote: Hi, have an issue with ospfd when using multiple areas and networks from area 10.0.30.0 not distributed to 0.0.0.0. eg excerpt from config area 0.0.0.0 { interface gre0 interface gre1 } area 10.0.30.0 { interface em0 } the network for em0

Re: spamd not greylisting for the correct time

On 09/02/2015 09:07 AM, Renaud Allard wrote: > Hello, > > I noticed some strange behavior from spamd in 5.7-stable. > It has been started with '-5 -S 15 -s 1 -G6:24:864' but it seems to add > to the whitelist every server which connects for the second time, > independently from the first parameter

Snapshot 2015.09.02 bsd.rd re0 network not fully set-up via dhcp

Hi misc@ Since the snapshot from 2015.09.02 dhcp doesn't result in a fully functional network in the installer. Last known working snapshot was 2015.08.22 (last upgrade performed on this laptop). What happens? 1. boot bsd.rd as usual 2. set language, filesystem checks etc, get to picking locat

Re: How to create "paranoid" cipher list in httpd.conf

On Tuesday 01 September 2015 15:14:17 Andreas Thulin wrote: > Hi misc readers! > > This is my first attempt to ask for help using misc@openbsd.org, so please > bear with me if I'm making mistakes. Also, apologies if I'm asking about > something recently discussed. > > I want to limit the number o

Re: pf vs mp

Em 01-09-2015 22:26, Quartz escreveu: > OK, so after more info you're switching to the mp side? If that's true > then all the latest recommendations from this afternoon forwards are > in favor of mp. Re-read all my emails. Just because I said I use single core, doesn't mean I switched sides. As I

OT: youtube video play in chromium - does play mode matters?

Hello, It is a little bit off topic, but this was discussed here in the past and I think it's nice to keep it here: some people complained about video playing in browsers. I have the same problems: too slow, sound stops, etc. I talk mostly about youtube and chromium. I use to play it in 240p resol

Re: maybe OT 11 year anniversay of Chuck Yerkes death

I think you should call it a commemoration. I'm not sure, I'm not a native english speaker (neither british or american).

Re: Ospf multiple areas not redistributing

On 02/09/15 10:31, Roger Skjetlein wrote: Hi, have an issue with ospfd when using multiple areas and networks from area 10.0.30.0 not distributed to 0.0.0.0. eg excerpt from config area 0.0.0.0 { interface gre0 interface gre1 } area 10.0.30.0 { interface em0 } the network for em0 is 1

current snapshot works on a Gigabyte Brix

Last time I tried (many months ago) ended in a kernel panic. Big thanks to Puffy/ Theo/ devs for liberating this box from it's old kernel !! Much happiness :-) --- OpenBSD 5.8-current (RAMDISK_CD) #1211: Wed Sep 2 08:50:46 MDT 2015 dera...@amd64.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/amd64/compile/R

Re: But wait, there's more.. another 5.8 song!

Much hope the LibreSSL is one of the most valuable and reused software by other projects and developer groups on teh Interwebs growing in popularity as a sane and correct replacement. Cheers to bad habits resulting in good themed music. Making it surreal to users too listening to the enjoyable col

Re: pf vs mp

Is it not possible to buy two or three representative models and test them to find out which of celeron, atom, or amd is fastest? Well as restrictive as our requirements are, there are still a few too many options for that. I kinda wanted to narrow it down some more first.

Re: pf vs mp

I think you are focusing on the thing that will probably give you less problems, the CPU. These kind of systems tend to have problems with a lot of things, *before* you ever get to the CPU. Such as? These aren't going to be doing hardly any disk IO and they don't need fancy graphics, so assumin

Re: But wait, there's more.. another 5.8 song!

As one of my favorite Beatles song, I'm in love with this version. On Sep 2, 2015 8:30 PM, wrote: > Much hope the LibreSSL is one of the most valuable and reused software > by other projects and developer groups on teh Interwebs growing in > popularity as a sane and correct replacement. > > Cheer

Re: pf vs mp

You really need to specify which chips you are looking at. Or even which range of chips. Huge difference between a single core atom vs a 16 core monster. I know you've said embedded systems, so you should be able to provide some idea of CPUs. Anything else is just a waste of time because of the

Re: maybe OT 11 year anniversay of Chuck Yerkes death

Either works as an American. Commenting on Chuck would be nice, but I only know him through these yearly emails, so I'll stay silent on that matter. On Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 09:42:52PM +0300, Mihai Popescu wrote: > I think you should call it a commemoration. I'm not sure, I'm not a > native english

Re: Snapshot 2015.09.02 bsd.rd re0 network not fully set-up via dhcp

Hello, On 02/09/15(Wed) 13:59, Adam Wolk wrote: > Since the snapshot from 2015.09.02 dhcp doesn't result in a fully > functional network in the installer. > [...] The bug should already be fixed, well I backed out the commit that exposed a bug with dhclient in RAMDISK kernels. Please try a newer

Re: Snapshot 2015.09.02 bsd.rd re0 network not fully set-up via dhcp

On Wed, 2 Sep 2015 22:49:02 +0200 Martin Pieuchot wrote: > Hello, > > On 02/09/15(Wed) 13:59, Adam Wolk wrote: > > Since the snapshot from 2015.09.02 dhcp doesn't result in a fully > > functional network in the installer. > > [...] > > The bug should already be fixed, well I backed out the comm

Native EFI Bootloader Support

Hello misc@, Native UEFI goes in tree. http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-cvs&m=144115942223734&w=2 . Great work all. So what might the future hold for UEFI Secure Boot. Regards, Gerald Hanuer

Re: Snapshot 2015.09.02 bsd.rd re0 network not fully set-up via dhcp

Tested today Sep 2nd 9 pm. Vancouver, BC. Nothing changed!