Hi misc@!
I run OpenBSD-{amd64,i386}-current for several years now on 3 machines,
having reinstalled everything late this summer because s.th. related to
either adsuck, ftp, cvs, pf or the netstack in general feels broken.
I have complained before in the last weeks but unfortunatelly the
usually
Dmitrij D. Czarkoff, 25 Oct 2014 22:21:
> FWIW I use mbsync (from mail/isync) to sync Gmail to local maildir, and
> have my mutt set up to work in maildir only. I set up cron to call
> mbsync on schedule, and I from then I totally forgot about the
> crappiness of Gmail's IMAP interface.
thanks fo
memtest did not reveal errors.
unfortunately i got another panic,
during some routine file operations.
(after the 2 previous panics, fsck
required manual running, and even
multiple runs, so maybe this one
is choking on fsck's best efforts,
i dont know.)
savecore: reboot after panic: ffs_blkfree:
On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 11:23:38PM -0400 or thereabouts, Michael W. Lucas wrote:
>
> MY auction raised $1145.
>
> There is no way that BoPF3 can POSSIBLY raise more than that!
>
> Consider the gauntlet thrown.
>
Nice one Michael! :-)
64-bit supposedly supports upto 16 exabytes of memory ('ram').
would such large capacities actually be possible to ue with
openbsd for amd64 architecture?
use-case: working with large in-memory storage for financial applications.
thanks.
2014-10-26 20:02 GMT+01:00 Mayuresh Kathe :
> 64-bit supposedly supports upto 16 exabytes of memory ('ram').
Current hardware supports "only" 2^48...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X86-64#Physical_address_space_details
Best
Martin
Hello,
I have a usecase for full disk encryption using softraid where the
keydisk is placed on the same harddrive as the encrypted partition. This
is not for protecting data on the drive in case it gets stolen, but
rather to allow for a quick way of making the data unrecoverable (by
destroying the
On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 12:02 PM, Mayuresh Kathe wrote:
> 64-bit supposedly supports upto 16 exabytes of memory ('ram').
> would such large capacities actually be possible to ue with
> openbsd for amd64 architecture?
> use-case: working with large in-memory storage for financial applications.
Cur
On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 7:27 AM, frantisek holop wrote:
> memtest did not reveal errors.
>
> unfortunately i got another panic,
> during some routine file operations.
>
> (after the 2 previous panics, fsck
> required manual running, and even
> multiple runs, so maybe this one
> is choking on fsck'
Hey List,
I am planning a new router / firewall / Wifi AP based on the Supermicro
SYS-5015A-EHF-D525
(http://www.newegg.ca/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16816101364) and was
hoping that I could get some feedback on PCIe wifi cards.
After going over the wireless FAQ and then doing some resear
2014-10-26 22:31 GMT+01:00 Gordon Turner :
> Rosewill RNX-G300LX
> (http://www.newegg.ca/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16833166021)
> - Up to 54Mbps
> - Chipset RaLink RT2561/RT61
> - Supported by ral
> http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi/OpenBSD-current/man4/ral.4?query=ral&sec=4
That's PCI, n
From owner-misc+m143...@openbsd.org Sun Oct 26 15:47:12 2014
X-Original-To: mayur...@devio.us
Delivered-To: mayur...@devio.us
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at devio.us
Authentication-Results: wolfman.devio.us (amavisd-new);
dkim=fail (2048-bit
From guent...@gmail.com Sun Oct 26 17:01:26 2014
X-Original-To: mayur...@devio.us
Delivered-To: mayur...@devio.us
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at devio.us
Authentication-Results: wolfman.devio.us (amavisd-new);
dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header
On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 12:02 PM, Mayuresh Kathe wrote:
> 64-bit supposedly supports upto 16 exabytes of memory ('ram').
> would such large capacities actually be possible to ue with
> openbsd for amd64 architecture?
> use-case: working with large in-memory storage for financial applications.
Chec
Jim Rowan [j...@computing.com] wrote:
>
> That's really odd... I cut/paste that line directly from the serial
> console.. I don't know how it got to be showing 0x8096 instead of 0x8086.
>
> Sorry for the false alarm! (I'll still have to track down what's wrong
> with flashrd... as I want to use
On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 5:59 PM, Mayuresh Kathe wrote:
...
> thanks for the details, but, since i am nowhere close to being a
> systems programmer, would like to know if there's any chance such
> support might be added in, in the near future?
You're asking whether in the near future we'll add sup
From owner-misc+m143...@openbsd.org Sun Oct 26 22:06:49 2014
X-Original-To: mayur...@devio.us
Delivered-To: mayur...@devio.us
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at devio.us
Authentication-Results: wolfman.devio.us (amavisd-new);
dkim=pass (2048-bit
2014-10-27 1:56 GMT+01:00 Mayuresh Kathe :
> if the intended application actually requires larger memory to be
> accessible, would it be better to go for a non-x86-64 64-bit hardware?
256TB (2^48) should be good enough till 2020.
From owner-misc+m143...@openbsd.org Sun Oct 26 22:22:57 2014
X-Original-To: mayur...@devio.us
Delivered-To: mayur...@devio.us
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at devio.us
Authentication-Results: wolfman.devio.us (amavisd-new);
dkim=fail (2048-bit
2014-10-27 3:37 GMT+01:00 Mayuresh Kathe :
> From owner-misc+m143...@openbsd.org Sun Oct 26 22:22:57 2014
Fix your mail client, please.
> 256TB (2^48) should be good enough till 2020.
>
> it is for a lot of records (data-sets) to held in memory instead
> of approaching the disk e
On Sun, Oct 26, 2014, at 10:21 PM, Martin Schröder wrote:
> 2014-10-27 1:56 GMT+01:00 Mayuresh Kathe :
> > if the intended application actually requires larger memory to be
> > accessible, would it be better to go for a non-x86-64 64-bit hardware?
>
> 256TB (2^48) should be good enough till 2020.
i am using mailx under openbsd, and instead of using the said
combination of tilde + p, i used tilde + m while attempting
to include original messages in my replies.
i apologize for the screw-up.
hello, i have been trying to fix the problem of mailx including the entire
header-set when issuing a tilde + m in a reply to include only the previous
emails body text (content).
one of the docs suggested using tilde + p, but dang, it didn't work for me
during tests executed just now.
if anyone her
23 matches
Mail list logo
