For the sendmail heroes out there... Let's say I have the following
in DNS:
$ORIGIN example.com.
@ IN MX 10 mx1
@ IN A 192.0.2.1
@ IN 2001:db8::1
mx1 IN A 192.0.2.2
mx1 IN 2001:db8::2
www IN A
Paul de Weerd writes:
> For the sendmail heroes out there... Let's say I have the following
> in DNS:
>
> $ORIGIN example.com.
> @ IN MX 10 mx1
> @ IN A 192.0.2.1
> @ IN 2001:db8::1
> mx1 IN A 192.0.2.2
> mx1 IN 2001:
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 12:23:18PM +0100, Paul de Weerd wrote:
>For the sendmail heroes out there... Let's say I have the following
>in DNS:
>
>$ORIGIN example.com.
>@ IN MX 10 mx1
>@ IN A 192.0.2.1
>@ IN 2001:db8::1
>mx1IN A 192
mailertable should work in this case, I think.
Vijay Sankar
ForeTell Technologies Limited
vsan...@foretell.ca
Sent from my iPhone
On 2013-03-21, at 7:23 AM, Paul de Weerd wrote:
> For the sendmail heroes out there... Let's say I have the following
> in DNS:
>
> $ORIGIN example.com.
> @
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 01:40:11PM +0100, Maurice Janssen wrote:
> Are you sure this is becaus of the PTR record (according to the subject of
> your email)? I think sendmail looks up the A and MX record for
> example.com and sees that the A record is a local IP.
> So, do you need the A record for
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 01:40:11PM +0100, Maurice Janssen wrote:
| Are you sure this is becaus of the PTR record (according to the subject of
| your email)? I think sendmail looks up the A and MX record for
| example.com and sees that the A record is a local IP.
Yes, I'm sure. I'm moving this do
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 07:32:46AM -0400, Vijay Sankar wrote:
| mailertable should work in this case, I think.
That's not how I read the comments in /etc/mail/mailertable:
# The sendmail(8) mailer table is used to override routing for particular
# non-local hostnames and domains (i.e., names oth
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 01:11:36PM +0100, Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas wrote:
| > - change PTR records to www.example.com
|
| I'd really go with this.
That's what I'll do if I can't resolve this in another (nice) way...
| http://weldon.whipple.org/sendmail/removew.html discusses this and gives
|
Hi,
On two occasions (had to test it to see if it was repeatable), ospfd has
crashed on my 5.2 release i386 machine while I was running a ruby script that
consumed too much memory (which also crashed). No other daemons on the machine
crashed except ospfd. Needless to say, my network also went
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 03:32:58PM +0200, MJ wrote:
| Hi,
|
| On two occasions (had to test it to see if it was repeatable), ospfd
| has crashed on my 5.2 release i386 machine while I was running a ruby
| script that consumed too much memory (which also crashed). No other
| daemons on the machine
Alan Corey [alan01...@gmail.com] wrote:
>
> Not much to go on probably, but anyone else seeing this?
>
OpenBSD 5.3-current (post 5.3 release) now supports the latest
Intel XF86 driver with KMS. It's worth trying before you do
look at much else. See the snapshots/i386 or snapshots/amd64
directory
Kevin Chadwick [ma1l1i...@yahoo.co.uk] wrote:
> Made my day.
>
> So does this mean machdep can be turned off for some hardware and is
> the best way to find out, simply to try?
>
If inteldrm attaches, the aperture now appears to work at 1 (instead
of 2) but not yet 0.
MJ [m...@sci.fi] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On two occasions (had to test it to see if it was repeatable), ospfd has
> crashed on my 5.2 release i386 machine while I was running a ruby script
> that consumed too much memory (which also crashed). No other daemons on the
> machine crashed except ospfd. Ne
Does someone experience any usb problem on lattest
current?
The very reason to ask is unpredictible behaveour
of keyboard and mouse, connected to the node through
usb switch. Yesterday I had a lot of errors and had
to stop X and do a lot of things. Today, it all works
like a charm. Like a ghost in
Sorry, I misunderstood. I thought you wanted mail from www.example.com
addressed to u...@example.com to go to a specific mail server and not be
delivered to a local account. Did not clue in that you were using example.com
to refer to ALL domains, not just your own domain.
Vijay Sankar
ForeTell
Is there a way to have Host stanzas in an ssh_config containing a
HostName entry match Host stanzas corresponding to said HostName? In
other words, given an ssh config
Host blah
HostName blah.example.org
Host *.example.org
User bob
can I have "ssh blah" also use the setti
Hosted Exchange Hizmetine Notebook Hediye
Exchange Kobi:
- 1-75 Kullanıcı arası
- 5 GB Mailbox alanı
- 1 adet Database
- Ortak Adres Defteri
- 5 Adet DaÄıtım Grubu
- Symantec Brightmail Premium Anti-Spam
- Exchange Server 2010
- 50 MB Standart Web Hosting Hizmeti
- Microsoft Outlook
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 15:32, MJ wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On two occasions (had to test it to see if it was repeatable), ospfd has
> crashed on my 5.2 release i386 machine while I was running a ruby script
> that consumed too much memory (which also crashed). No other daemons on
> the machine crashed ex
On Mar 21, 2013, at 10:46 PM, Ted Unangst wrote:
>
> There is no OOM killer. Your bug report also lacks crucial details
> like what it means to crash. Do you mean it logged a message like
> "fatal: out of memory"? That's not a crash, that's a message informing
> you about an error condition. You
On 2013-03-21 08:51, Kapetanakis Giannis wrote:
> On 21/03/13 01:37, Hugo Osvaldo Barrera wrote:
> >I've been having a very annoying issue with an 82574L for a pretty long
> >time now.
> >
> >After the PC is turned off (either properly or due to a power failure),
> >the NIC does not work upon the n
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 7:30 AM, Ryan Kavanagh wrote:
> Is there a way to have Host stanzas in an ssh_config containing a
> HostName entry match Host stanzas corresponding to said HostName? In
> other words, given an ssh config
>
> Host blah
> HostName blah.example.org
>
> Host *.e
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 10:40:18AM +1100, Darren Tucker wrote:
> No, not currently.
Bummer.
> There is an open enhancement request to let it match subnets, which
> may or may not be sufficient for what you want
> (https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1169).
Not quite. What I was looking
Forget it. I'm almost finished a clean install of 5.2 that's taken
about 2 months by modem. I'll live with a reduced number of
screensavers. I just wanted to mention that there is a problem. I
don't have the bandwidth to fool around with current and replacing it
every week.
Alan
On 3/21/13,
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 18:09, Ted Unangst wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 18:17, matteo filippetto wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> what do you think about starting sshd before mount NFS resources?
>
> ssh comes last because users are not allowed onto the system until the
> system is ready.
oh, and if there
24 matches
Mail list logo
