On 2013/02/24 17:29, Chris Smith wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 4:10 PM, Stuart Henderson
> wrote:
> > It seems your tree is not clean, the tsig_get_algorithm_by_id prototype
> > which it's complaining about was removed in tsig.h r1.1.1.3.
>
> I have plenty of tsig.h files:
> =
- Marc Espie [2013-02-24 13:21:09 +0100] - :
> On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 08:57:14AM +, James Griffin wrote:
> > - rich...@thornton.net [2013-02-21 00:29:45
> > +] - :
> >
> > > Is sendmail enabled by default? If not, how do I do that?
> >
> > It's not enabled by default
On 02/24/2013 11:32 PM, David Gwynne wrote:
what are you using the rewrite stuff for?
netbooting.
pxeboot is unable to pick a kernel based on machine.
and as I run an oddball mix of current/stable
i386/amd64 (and sparc64 but it does not count as ofwboot.net does
specify kernel)
so I use tft
Hi
I have the latest snapshot amd64 arc. I would like to change to the i386
platform.
I think if I delete/remove all packages then boot into the i386 bsd.rd and
install all the i386 binaries, etc. and then reinstall all my packages this
will be ok and will mean I don't have to reinstall from
James Griffin writes:
> I have the latest snapshot amd64 arc. I would like to change to the i386
> platform.
That will be a complete reinstall.
> I think if I delete/remove all packages then boot into the i386 bsd.rd
> and install all the i386 binaries, etc. and then reinstall all my
> packa
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 15:45 +0100, Michael wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> after having a somewhat weird problem for a while now I hope someone can
> help me. _Sorry_ for the really lengthy mail but it is kind of complex
> to describe.
>
> dmesg and other information can be found at the end.
>
> The prob
- Peter N. M. Hansteen [2013-02-25 13:20:32 +0100] - :
> James Griffin writes:
>
> > I have the latest snapshot amd64 arc. I would like to change to the i386
> > platform.
>
> That will be a complete reinstall.
>
> > I think if I delete/remove all packages then boot into the i386 b
2013/2/25 James Griffin :
> I think if I delete/remove all packages then boot into the i386 bsd.rd and
> install all the i386 binaries, etc. and then reinstall all my packages this
> will be ok and will mean I don't have to reinstall from scratch using a cd
> iso image?
>
> Is this ok to do? Wil
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 01:20:32PM +0100, Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote:
> James Griffin writes:
>
> > I have the latest snapshot amd64 arc. I would like to change to the i386
> > platform.
>
> That will be a complete reinstall.
>
> > I think if I delete/remove all packages then boot into the i
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 1:03 AM, Mike Korbakov wrote:
> May be, your host system too old, and in -current system header files has
> changed significantly.
> Compare files in /usr/include/sys and /usr/src/sys/sys (check other headers
> too)
> Or download and install -current as host for building.
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 3:39 AM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> Is /usr/obj clean? Also, if you're building outside of "make build"
> make sure you use "make -f Makefile.bsd-wrapper". I built the nsd update
> successfully on amd64 i386 macppc and vax before I committed it and
> there have been various
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 16:29, Marc Espie wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 01:20:32PM +0100, Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote:
>> James Griffin writes:
>>
>> > I have the latest snapshot amd64 arc. I would like to change to the
> i386 platform.
>>
>> That will be a complete reinstall.
>>
>> > I think if
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 11:18 AM, Chris Smith wrote:
> I use a .cvsrc file with:
> =
> cvs -q -danon...@anoncvs3.usa.openbsd.org:/cvs
> diff -up
> update -Pd
> checkout -P
> =
I do not checkout the ports or xenocara trees as the system has no X
and
All,
Is there anyone happened to run into the same problem as following:
In OpenBSD 5.2 + xfce4, when you are trying login using a ordinary user
from XFCE4 login window, it prompts the error "Login incorrect or forbidden
by policy".
If I set xdm_flags=NO back, login in the text mode and then sta
I know about Soekris and Alix. Please tell me if there is anyone else worthy
of attention.
Thanks!
On Sun, 24 Feb 2013 21:10:30 GMT, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2013-02-24, Chris Smith wrote:
> > cc -I. -I/usr/src/usr.sbin/nsd -O2 -pipe -c /usr/src/usr.sbin/nsd/nsd-xfe
> r.c
> > /usr/src/usr.sbin/nsd/nsd-xfer.c:175: error: static declaration of
> > 'tsig_get_algorithm_by_id' follows non-sta
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 8:04 AM, Ted Unangst wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 16:29, Marc Espie wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 01:20:32PM +0100, Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote:
>>> James Griffin writes:
>>>
>>> > I have the latest snapshot amd64 arc. I would like to change to the
>> i386 platform.
I have easy to use setups of fvwm and xfce.
I recently started building xfce and I notice it pulled in polkit which
I am not a fan of for multiple reasons mainly because sudo is simply
better in every way except shipping permissions by default. Which IMO
is a plus though it could ship commented en
Hi. Just a quick question. Is thread-local storage support on GCC 4.2 or
Clang in the roadmap of some developer or nobody is interested?. I'm
asking because I don't know if I can trust the TLS support of GCC 4.6.
Cheers.
--
Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado http://juanfra.info
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 5:50 PM, Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado
wrote:
> Hi. Just a quick question. Is thread-local storage support on GCC 4.2 or
> Clang in the roadmap of some developer or nobody is interested?
Yes, it's on my todo list. One tricky part is the variance across
architectures in c
There's certainly interest in supporting ELF TLS (i.e., the __thread and
thread_local storage classes), but it's going to require some more work
still.
I'm not familiar with GCC 4.6's TLS support in specific, but unless it
compiles to calls to pthread_{get,set}specific(), etc (which I don't think
21 matches
Mail list logo
