On 2013 Jan 07 (Mon) at 23:50:04 -0800 (-0800), noah pugsley wrote:
So what? This is radically off-topic, please don't bring this kind of
crap to misc@.
--
You may be sure that when a man begins to call himself a "realist," he
is preparing to do something he is secretly ashamed of doing.
On 07/01/13 14:19 +0100, Manuel Giraud wrote:
>Hi,
>
>After a recent upgrade to -current (yesterday from ftp.fr.openbsd.org),
>rtorrent (with ~10 active torrents) ends up waiting on pmrwait
>(according to top). I cannot even kill -9 this process. I never run into
>this issue with a one month old -c
> Hi,
>
> I installed Virtualbox 2.2.4 and everything is 100%.
>
You hope so but make it clear if you ever hit problems that you are not
on bare metal as bug reports have been looked at and been found to be
the fault of Virtualbox in the past with Theo commenting on their forum
that he couldn't
On 17:04 Mon 07 Jan , Justin Mayes wrote:
> I got this. I had 2 com ports on this old target desktop and when I switched
> the serial cable to the right one, it worked. I have working DDB kernel with
> structs as well as a working kgdb kernel with current.
>
> Justin
Good. Any chance to get
On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 03:09:10AM +0100, Jan Stary wrote:
> Index: midi.4
> ===
> RCS file: /cvs/src/share/man/man4/midi.4,v
> retrieving revision 1.26
> diff -u -p -r1.26 midi.4
> --- midi.44 Oct 2010 09:32:43 - 1.26
>
Absolutely. Nothing custom, the build errors have all been fixed at least in
CURRENT so I just had to get the kernel config right.
Ddb and kgdb are mutually exclusive so your kernel must be built for one or
the other.
For ddb
It's there by default in GENERIC, you just have to set sysctl
machdep.
Hi,
I am running an openbsd router attached to several vlans. On one of them
there is running a box with an isc-dhcp server.
For one of the vlans I have started a dhcrelay to forward the dhcp
broadcasts of the respective subnet to the server
dhcrelay -i vlan5 172.16.1.4
This is working fine
cd /dev
for i in $(jot 20 10); do ./MAKEDEV bpf${i} ; done
to make 20 more bpfs. Each tcpdump and dhcrelay will want one of their
own so you may need more dev-entries.
2013/1/8 Ulrich Drolshagen :
> Hi,
>
> I am running an openbsd router attached to several vlans. On one of them
> there is runnin
Hello misc@,
I'm researching locking things down, and I'm wondering what the current
best practice is for isolating risky programs. It seems this community
has traditionally shunned virtualization as a solution, and also called
exclusively chrooting "insufficient". Okay, sure.
But what is better
On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 01:54:04PM -0500, Jean-Philippe Ouellet wrote:
> So what do you guys recommend? Should I just chroot a vm who's network
> traffic all goes through a local filter, and hope for the best? I'm
> really at a loss for what to do here.
Don't use firefox. Don't browse the web.
i agree with Marc, don't be paranoid :s you use OpenBSD as a desktop
it's a great thing (personnaly i run Linux, because of driver supports).
--
Cordialement,
Loïc BLOT, UNIX systems, security and network expert
http://www.unix-experience.fr
Le mardi 08 janvier 2013 Ã 20:24 +0100, Marc Espie a
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 10:54 AM, Jean-Philippe Ouellet
wrote:
> Hello misc@,
>
> I'm researching locking things down, and I'm wondering what the current
> best practice is for isolating risky programs. It seems this community
> has traditionally shunned virtualization as a solution, and also calle
Am 08.01.2013 19:48, schrieb Janne Johansson:
cd /dev
for i in $(jot 20 10); do ./MAKEDEV bpf${i} ; done
to make 20 more bpfs. Each tcpdump and dhcrelay will want one of their
own so you may need more dev-entries.
Thank you, this did the trick. I really didn't know what "bpf" are and
didn't thin
On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 01:54:04PM -0500, Jean-Philippe Ouellet wrote:
> Hello misc@,
>
> I'm researching locking things down, and I'm wondering what the current
> best practice is for isolating risky programs. It seems this community
> has traditionally shunned virtualization as a solution, and a
On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 06:37:45PM +0100, Ulrich Drolshagen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am running an openbsd router attached to several vlans. On one of
> them there is running a box with an isc-dhcp server.
> For one of the vlans I have started a dhcrelay to forward the dhcp
> broadcasts of the respecti
if i'm not mistaken, it's Berkeley Packet Filter.
I must do the same issue for dhcpd when i use many vlan interfaces and
PF :)
--
Cordialement,
Loïc BLOT, UNIX systems, security and network expert
http://www.unix-experience.fr
Le mardi 08 janvier 2013 à 20:39 +0100, Ulrich Drolshagen a écrit
Just saw more information on Ubiquiti forum.
The CPU is a Octeon+ 2 core so CN50XX or CN52XX.
http://www.cavium.com/OCTEON_MIPS64.html
From the forum :
root@router:/home/ubnt# cat /proc/cpuinfo
system type : UBNT_E100
processor : 0
cpu model : Cavium Octeo
Hi,
On OpenBSD 5.2 / amd64, pkg_delete fails with this message :
# pkg_delete my_pkg
Read shared items: ok
Can't locate object method "realname" via package
"OpenBSD::PackingElement::FDESC" at /usr/libdata/perl5/OpenBSD/Delete.pm
line 526.
Any ideas ?
kdump :
8016 ktrace EMUL "native"
On 2013-01-04 00:41, Aaron Mason wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 1:28 PM, Hugo Osvaldo Barrera
> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'm curious as to why growfs is not included in bsd.rd. Is there any
>> particular reason for this? I belive it would be inmensly useful - since
>> bsd.rd is the first thing on
On 01/08/13 10:54, Jean-Philippe Ouellet wrote:
Hello misc@,
I'm researching locking things down, and I'm wondering what the current
best practice is for isolating risky programs. It seems this community
has traditionally shunned virtualization as a solution, and also called
exclusively chrootin
> >A chroot or even just a separate user would seem to fix that problem,
> >assuming they couldn't easily break out of it (probably not a safe
> >assumption), but that still leaves many other issues, for example it
> >would still be able to send network traffic originating from my machine,
> >which
21 matches
Mail list logo
