> Hi, > > I installed Virtualbox 2.2.4 and everything is 100%. >
You hope so but make it clear if you ever hit problems that you are not on bare metal as bug reports have been looked at and been found to be the fault of Virtualbox in the past with Theo commenting on their forum that he couldn't believe any OS would allow what it was doing with memory. I didn't speak up because others have said it's fixed, I wonder now if it is just the VT-X that fixed Virtualbox. > It seems the newer version of Virtualbox is confused by my hardware/host > os combination and cannot deal with the VT-X, even though it's enabled > in my bios. The same applies to Vmware but if you do have any panics etc. you may wish to try it. I've used it reliably even without VT-X with OpenBSD. I prefer Virtualbox though because it doesn't constantly eat all your space and pause the thing if you run out and hacks to fix this are said to reduce reliability. -- _______________________________________________________________________ 'Write programs that do one thing and do it well. Write programs to work together. Write programs to handle text streams, because that is a universal interface' (Doug McIlroy) _______________________________________________________________________
