On 06/24/11 16:51, Anand Buddhdev wrote:
> Hello list users,
>
> I have a virtual server for testing, on which I have installed OpenBSD 4.8.
> The installation is on wd0a, and there's just a single / partition.
>
> I then did a second installation, and setup OpenBSD 4.9 on wd0d, also with a
> sin
Hello Ted,
Ted Unangst writes:
> 2011/6/26 Fridiric Perrin :
>> I'm currently toying with OpenBSD's boot process. I see in
>> arch/i386/stand//libsa/dev_i386.c:bdevs that one can boot from a an
>> "scd" device. However, `apropos scd' doesn't tell me anything
>
> Some kind of old CDROM that was ne
Dear list member,
i have installed OpenBSD on my desktop; every thing is ok, expect for
disk information report.
It is showed as wd0. I am confused because as far as i know it is a sata device.
Why does it (OpenBSD) see it as an old wd.
Thanks in advance.
On Mon, 27 Jun 2011 08:31:43 -0300, Friedrich Locke wrote:
>Dear list member,
>
>i have installed OpenBSD on my desktop; every thing is ok, expect for
>disk information report.
>It is showed as wd0. I am confused because as far as i know it is a sata
>device.
Yep, and the old one is pata.
So th
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 1:31 PM, Friedrich Locke
wrote:
> Dear list member,
>
> i have installed OpenBSD on my desktop; every thing is ok, expect for
> disk information report.
> It is showed as wd0. I am confused because as far as i know it is a sata
> device.
>
> Why does it (OpenBSD) see it as
On 27/06/2011, at 9:31 PM, Friedrich Locke wrote:
> Dear list member,
>
> i have installed OpenBSD on my desktop; every thing is ok, expect for
> disk information report.
> It is showed as wd0. I am confused because as far as i know it is a sata
device.
>
> Why does it (OpenBSD) see it as an old w
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 01:44:39PM +0200, David Coppa wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 1:31 PM, Friedrich Locke
> wrote:
> > Dear list member,
> >
> > i have installed OpenBSD on my desktop; every thing is ok, expect for
> > disk information report.
> > It is showed as wd0. I am confused because
On 2011 Jun 27 (Mon) at 13:54:32 +0200 (+0200), Otto Moerbeek wrote:
:On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 01:44:39PM +0200, David Coppa wrote:
:
:> On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 1:31 PM, Friedrich Locke
:> wrote:
:> > Dear list member,
:> >
:> > i have installed OpenBSD on my desktop; every thing is ok, expect for
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 02:00:26PM +0200, Peter Hessler wrote:
> On 2011 Jun 27 (Mon) at 13:54:32 +0200 (+0200), Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> :On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 01:44:39PM +0200, David Coppa wrote:
> :
> :> On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 1:31 PM, Friedrich Locke
> :> wrote:
> :> > Dear list member,
> :>
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 08:57:27AM +0200, Christopher Zimmermann wrote:
> On 06/24/11 16:51, Anand Buddhdev wrote:
> > Hello list users,
> >
> > I have a virtual server for testing, on which I have installed OpenBSD 4.8.
> > The installation is on wd0a, and there's just a single / partition.
> >
On 27 June 2011 04:46, Nick Holland wrote:
Hello Nick,
> I then did a second installation, and setup OpenBSD 4.9 on wd0d, also with
> a
> > single / partition.
>
> bad.
>
Why is this bad? What's wrong with having 2 OpenBSD installations on a
single disk?
> it's an unsupported configuration --
On 2011 Jun 27 (Mon) at 14:32:47 +0200 (+0200), Anand Buddhdev wrote:
:My scenario is that I have a small Soekris board running an older OpenBSD
:(installed on a CF card).
:
:I'd like to upgrade to a newer OpenBSD without overwriting the current setup
:(to use as a fallback in case something is wro
Hi,
I start mpd and aucat with default settings using rc scripts.
aucat thus runs as user _sndio and mpd runs as _mpd.
Access to sndio between mpd and programs running as a different user are
mutually exclusive, so when mpd is playing music nothing else can access
the sound device.
According to the
On 27 June 2011 14:40, Peter Hessler wrote:
On 2011 Jun 27 (Mon) at 14:32:47 +0200 (+0200), Anand Buddhdev wrote:
> :My scenario is that I have a small Soekris board running an older OpenBSD
> :(installed on a CF card).
> :
> :I'd like to upgrade to a newer OpenBSD without overwriting the current
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 02:42:42PM +0200, Jona Joachim wrote:
> Hi,
> I start mpd and aucat with default settings using rc scripts.
> aucat thus runs as user _sndio and mpd runs as _mpd.
> Access to sndio between mpd and programs running as a different user are
> mutually exclusive, so when mpd is
On 06/27/2011 08:32 AM, Anand Buddhdev wrote:
On 27 June 2011 04:46, Nick Holland wrote:
Hello Nick,
I then did a second installation, and setup OpenBSD 4.9 on wd0d, also with
a
single / partition.
bad.
Why is this bad? What's wrong with having 2 OpenBSD installations on a
single disk?
On 2011-06-27, Alexandre Ratchov wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 02:42:42PM +0200, Jona Joachim wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I start mpd and aucat with default settings using rc scripts.
>> aucat thus runs as user _sndio and mpd runs as _mpd.
>> Access to sndio between mpd and programs running as a different
Hi,
ksh(1) states this:
Functions defined with the function reserved word are treated differently
in the following ways from functions defined with the () notation:
[...]
o Parameter assignments preceding function calls are not kept in the
shell environment (executing Bour
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 11:00 AM, Christopher Zimmermann
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> ksh(1) states this:
>
> Functions defined with the function reserved word are treated differently
>in the following ways from functions defined with the () notation:
>
>[...]
>
>o Parameter assignments precedin
Hi,
At the end of May, there was discussion on the list regarding the panic
related to interdrm when installing 4.8 or 4.9 on Supermicro P8SCi mobos. At
the time, it looked like a fix was going to be checked in.
I was hoping that a new ISO might be posted with this fix, but I don't see
anything l
On 06/27/2011 02:03 PM, listmail wrote:
Hi,
At the end of May, there was discussion on the list regarding the panic
related to interdrm when installing 4.8 or 4.9 on Supermicro P8SCi mobos. At
the time, it looked like a fix was going to be checked in.
I was hoping that a new ISO might be posted
On 06/27/11 17:49, Ted Unangst wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 11:00 AM, Christopher Zimmermann
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> ksh(1) states this:
>>
>> Functions defined with the function reserved word are treated differently
>>in the following ways from functions defined with the () notation:
>>
>>
On 2011-05-21, Ed D. wrote:
> I'm posting this because I haven't yet found
> a resolution ot this problem.
>From what I understand, this is fixed with this commit in -current
-
PatchSet 3072
Date: 2011/04/17 21:44:27
Author: stsp
Branch: HEAD
Tag: (none)
Log:
in_ifinit() i
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 2:44 PM, Christopher Zimmermann
wrote:
> Ok, I got it. But wtf? Thats creepy! Is there any rationale behind this
> strange bourne behaviour?!?
I would guess historical accident or some quirk of the implementation.
Then once it was discovered, it became unfixable because o
Hi,
when umount(8)ing by device, umount fetches the mountpoint via
getmntinfo(3), because unmount(2) only supports unmounting via
mountpoint.
This means it is simply impossible to unmount a specific filesystem
from an overloaded mountpoint. I think umount(8) should detect this
case, warn the user
Hi,
I have a friend in the Peace Corp in Morocco. He's using a ZTE MF 180
USB modem connecting with Maroc Telecom on his windows based Acer
Netbook. I'm already sick of walking him through removing the latest
windows 'sploit of the week, especially given that we do it through
e-mail and acr
Hello all, I'm new so if I do anything rude please let me know so I can adjust.
I set up an openbsd file server using sftp, with a raid 1
configuration and failover with Carp. My plan was to use rsync to sync
up the file sharing directories and I believe I got a little bit ahead
of myself when I t
[IMAGE]
Empresa Registrada ante la STPS Reg. COLG640205CP30005 Smguenos en
Twitter@pmscapacitacion o bien en Facebook PMS de Mixico
Conozca de la mano de un experto el correcto uso de este sistema !No deje
pasar oportunidades de Negocio!
Manejo Sptimo del Sistema Compranet 5.0
29 de Junio Guad
[IMAGE]
Empresa Registrada ante la STPS Reg. COLG640205CP30005 Smguenos en
Twitter@pmscapacitacion o bien en Facebook PMS de Mixico
Conozca de la mano de un experto el correcto uso de este sistema !No deje
pasar oportunidades de Negocio!
Manejo Sptimo del Sistema Compranet 5.0
29 de Junio Guada
29 matches
Mail list logo
