On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 08:20:30PM -0600, Andy Bradford wrote:
> Thus said Claudio Jeker on Fri, 10 Sep 2010 21:36:16 +0200:
>
> > Because on busy servers you need to queue quite a few packets to
> > handle bursts.
>
> I was under the impression that UDP is connectionless and therefore
I install OpenBSD 4.7 on a firewall NEC_Express_5800_i110Ra-1h
Be default i config all the three ethernet adapter ,but only the
first em0 can work well,but the other2 one is em1 and the other is
is fxp0 can not work well.
Who can tell me how to fix this problem
ifconfig -a
# ifconfig -a
lo0:
Am 10.09.2010 03:12, schrieb J.C. Roberts:
> Personally, I buy the release CDs just for the stickers. ;)
Me too :-)
My guess is that I'll buy lots of stuff I don't really need at the
EuroBSDCon next month...
Cheers, Matthias
On 2010-09-11, Hugo Osvaldo Barrera wrote:
> I've tried building python 2.6 from ports since I need setuptools for 2.6.
> However, when I try to make install (or any other sort of make), I get
> this error:
>
> # pwd
> /usr/ports/devel/py-setuptools
> # make install
> Makefile:28: *** missing sepa
On 2010-09-09, Keith wrote:
> I'd defiantly pay for 802.11G, hope that it's working in this release.
ral0: flags=8847 mtu 1500
lladdr 00:22:43:14:9b:35
priority: 4
groups: wlan egress
media: IEEE802.11 autoselect (OFDM54 mode 11g)
status: active
ral0 at pc
Thus said Claudio Jeker on Sat, 11 Sep 2010 11:28:31 +0200:
> Wrong UDP is normaly not a fully defined 4 touple. Especially the
> listening sockets (on port 53) can be slammed with packets. On the
> other hand, if the recvbuffer overflows then packets just get dropped.
Thank you for the
On 2010-09-11, Leo wrote:
> I install OpenBSD 4.7 on a firewall NEC_Express_5800_i110Ra-1h
> Be default i config all the three ethernet adapter ,but only the
> first em0 can work well,but the other2 one is em1 and the other is
> is fxp0 can not work well.
> Who can tell me how to fix this pro
On 10 sep 2010, at 21.24, Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote:
> Per-Olov Sjvholm writes:
>
>> It seems the first one is unable to convert as is seems "no match in
on..."
>> does not work.
>
> Off the top of my head, move the rdr-to bits to your pass rules, make
> sure the pass rule without the rdr-to is
On 11 sep 2010, at 23.49, Per-Olov Sjvholm wrote:
>
> On 10 sep 2010, at 21.24, Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote:
>
>> Per-Olov Sjvholm writes:
>>
>>> It seems the first one is unable to convert as is seems "no match in
on..."
>>> does not work.
>>
>> Off the top of my head, move the rdr-to bits to you
Hello.
I use my OBSD machine to test some server on another machine. They are
connected by pathcord, 1Gbit network cards are used.
Test program (uses kqueue) do many (I want thousands) connections to
server. Write query, read answer.
And it tries to keep that much connections by doing as much new
c
10 matches
Mail list logo
