Re: Logitech Quick Cam driver

On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 6:07 PM, Bertrand Janin wrote: > This stuff was an experiment, the code is awful and I don't recommend > using it for anything but morbid curiosity. It only works with the > "Express" version of the webcam, it doesn't integrate with anything and > will only let you capture

Re: kern.maxclusters: 6144 -> ?

On 26. feb. 2010, at 03.01, Aaron Mason wrote: > On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 10:04 AM, Pete Vickers wrote: >> Hi, >> >> A proxy (squid) server running i368/4.6RELEASE with around 800 users, what >> would be a reasonable value to increase kern.maxclusters too, to cure this : >> >> >> r...@proxy-s ~>

Re: kern.maxclusters: 6144 -> ?

On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 11:30:30AM +0100, Pete Vickers wrote: > On 26. feb. 2010, at 03.01, Aaron Mason wrote: > > > On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 10:04 AM, Pete Vickers wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> A proxy (squid) server running i368/4.6RELEASE with around 800 users, what > >> would be a reasonable value

Re: bad address for f...@openbsd.org?

yes. i already sent it to millert@ alerting about a few days ago. i guess, he is the sysadmin of the maillists. On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 6:56 PM, Mark Nipper wrote: >I got this while trying to e-mail f...@openbsd.org just > now: > --- > The original message was received at Thu, 25 Feb 2010

Re: Sparc classic serial ports ttya vs cuaa

> Hi all, > > I've been working on getting gpsd working on one of my old Sun IPXes but > I've run into a problem with ldattach needing the /dev/cuaa device. The > serial port /dev/ttya is working with gpsd directly but ldattach requires > /dev/cuaa. However, according to the system logs, ldatt

Re: PostgreSQL and perl script ->perl.core

Chris Bennett wrote: Stuart Henderson wrote: oh, please also keep /tmp/pkglist around in case anyone wants to see it.. On 2010-02-26, Stuart Henderson wrote: On 2010-02-25, Chris Bennett wrote: Stuart Henderson wrote: On 2010-02-23, Chris Bennett wrote: I just upgra

Re: PostgreSQL and perl script ->perl.core

On 2010/02/26 07:47, Chris Bennett wrote: > >"debug" version still works clean > > > I have now given myself a new problem > > Apache is now blown out: > runs but I get > [Fri Feb 26 07:44:14 2010] [notice] child pid 26552 exit signal > Segmentation fault (11) > > for every access httpd ABI got

Apache Seg faults children after latest upgrade

I just upgraded to latest -current trying to eliminate problem with PostgreSQL. Apache now starts but segmentation faults(11) for every child. -- A human being should be able to change a diaper, plan an invasion, butcher a hog, conn a ship, design a building, write a sonnet, balance accounts, b

Re: managing routes for multiple PPPoE connections

On 2010-02-26, Edwin Eyan Moragas wrote: > On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 6:28 AM, Stuart Henderson > wrote: >> ah, the thing that mightn't have been apparent with my suggestion >> of route-to, is that my default route points out of a normal >> ethernet interface, which stays up all the time > > so i g

Re: PostgreSQL and perl script ->perl.core

Stuart Henderson wrote: On 2010/02/26 07:47, Chris Bennett wrote: "debug" version still works clean I have now given myself a new problem Apache is now blown out: runs but I get [Fri Feb 26 07:44:14 2010] [notice] child pid 26552 exit signal Segmentation fault (11) for every access

Re: Apache Seg faults children after latest upgrade

On 2010-02-26, Chris Bennett wrote: > I just upgraded to latest -current trying to eliminate problem with > PostgreSQL. > > Apache now starts but segmentation faults(11) for every child. > I already replied when you asked on the other thread. http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.os.openbsd.misc/1702

Re: Apache Seg faults children after latest upgrade

Chris Bennett wrote: I just upgraded to latest -current trying to eliminate problem with PostgreSQL. Apache now starts but segmentation faults(11) for every child. I already got answer to this, httpd DBI has changed -- A human being should be able to change a diaper, plan an invasion, butche

poor setwork performance on gigabit link

Hi All, I can reach only approx. 8 Mbyte/s on a LAN between the server and the client. The complete network is capable of gigabit yet the speed reaches 15Mb/s then starts to trigger high/low and stabilyses at 8000kb/s. I tried the 2 interfaces of the server (running OpenBSD) with similar result

arbitrary ip range in pf

Is it possible to write a rule based on a arbitrary ip rule instead using a full subnet as source address like this? hosts_allowed="{ 192.168.0.21-40 }" And even using a single host on this following rule, i get a syntax error. Can someone point what is wrong? host_allowed="192.168.0.21" im_se

Re: arbitrary ip range in pf

On 26 February 2010 c. 20:23:31 Leonardo Carneiro - Veltrac wrote: > Is it possible to write a rule based on a arbitrary ip rule instead > using a full subnet as source address like this? > > hosts_allowed="{ 192.168.0.21-40 }" > > And even using a single host on this following rule, i get a syntax

Re: arbitrary ip range in pf

On 26/02/10 19:23, Leonardo Carneiro - Veltrac wrote: Is it possible to write a rule based on a arbitrary ip rule instead using a full subnet as source address like this? hosts_allowed="{ 192.168.0.21-40 }" pf.conf(4) Ranges of addresses are specified using the `-' operator. For

Re: arbitrary ip range in pf

On 26/02/10 19:53, Kapetanakis Giannis wrote: pf.conf(4) pf.conf(5)

Re: arbitrary ip range in pf

Tks Kapetanakis and Vadis for your help. I'll try this out. Kapetanakis Giannis wrote: On 26/02/10 19:23, Leonardo Carneiro - Veltrac wrote: Is it possible to write a rule based on a arbitrary ip rule instead using a full subnet as source address like this? hosts_allowed="{ 192.168.0.21-40

Re: poor setwork performance on gigabit link

On Fri, 26 Feb 2010 17:27:12 +0100 "jean-francois" wrote: > Hi All, > > I can reach only approx. 8 Mbyte/s on a LAN between the server and > the client. > > The complete network is capable of gigabit yet the speed reaches > 15Mb/s then starts to trigger high/low and stabilyses at 8000kb/s. > >

Re: poor setwork performance on gigabit link

> net.inet.tcp.recvspace=16384 > net.inet.tcp.sendspace=16384 http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq6.html Section 6.6.4 -Bryan

Re: poor setwork performance on gigabit link

Sorry but I'm dieing of curiosity, how the heck did you swap a "n" by a "s" in your subject ?

Re: poor setwork performance on gigabit link

2010/2/26 Christiano F. Haesbaert : > Sorry but I'm dieing of curiosity, how the heck did you swap a "n" by > a "s" in your subject ? > Oooops, forgot dvorak existed.

Re: poor network performance on gigabit link

Le Vendredi 26 Fivrier 2010 19:48:55, Christiano F. Haesbaert a icrit : > Sorry but I'm dieing of curiosity, how the heck did you swap a "n" by > a "s" in your subject ? I can't say. Thanks for the few answers, however I already tried such things as turning the net.inet.tcp.recvspace and net.inet

SSH through port SMTP

Hi, I would like to connect via SSH protocol to a remote site running obsd PF in bridge mode where the only externally open port is SMTP, since there is a mail server running. I Thought of setting up PF at the remote site with the following ruleset: rdr on $ext_if inet proto tcp from $myip to

Re: poor setwork performance on gigabit link

On 2/26/2010 5:27 PM, jean-francois wrote: pciide1 at pci0 dev 9 function 0 "NVIDIA MCP77 AHCI" rev 0xa2: DMA (unsupported), channel 0 wired to native-PCI, channel 1 wired to native-PCI pciide1: using apic 4 int 11 (irq 11) for native-PCI interrupt wd0 at pciide1 channel 0 drive 0: wd0: 1-sector

bookyourcruise.eu

www.bookyourcruise.eu New website with the lowest cruise rates and best service guaranteed i...@bookyourcruise.eu Follow us on Facebook to start getting the best deals bookyourcruise.eu

Re: SSH through port SMTP

You are trying to do something evil by making a bridge pretend it is the host on its other side. Do not do that. Just fix the upstream firewall to pass the management traffic you need to the box. 127.0.0.1 shouldn't arrive on a non-loopback interface. If you wanted to try to do this kind of silly

Badly formatted output for man -k

Hi all, I installed jre-1.7.0 from packages and add directories to /etc/man.conf, but when using 'man -k' I can see some messed output. Is it correct output for those man pages or is is something broken in my /etc/man.conf ? $ man -k java Java IDL: Transient Naming Service (1) - \f2tnameserv This

Re: poor setwork performance on gigabit link

I think topic is closed. Thanks for notice PIO mode. Network is ok but disk mode is not. Here is the limit, not the network. Regards. Le Vendredi 26 Fivrier 2010 21:04:04, Peter Strvmberg a icrit : > On 2/26/2010 5:27 PM, jean-francois wrote: > > pciide1 at pci0 dev 9 function 0 "NVIDIA MCP77 AHC

Site recommendation from a friend

Hello Dear, How are you today hope healthy?It's my pleasure to contact you in having communication, through this letter I seek an opportunity to invest and do business with you in Indonesia as my Partner, I have a sizable asset to invest and I would like to work with you in doing business. I'm l

Re: Badly formatted output for man -k

Hi Tomas, i'm answering off the top of my head, so bear with me in case this is not entirely accurate, i'm lacking the time to check the details right now. > I installed jre-1.7.0 from packages and add directories to > /etc/man.conf, but when using 'man -k' I can see some messed output. What apr

Instituciones Educativas Sumando por la Calidad

Ofertas Noticias Novedades

selling bsd in cd for profit??

Can I selling openBSD in CD for profit??

Re: selling bsd in cd for profit??

On Feb 26, 2010, at 6:44 PM, Citra Cool wrote: > Can I selling openBSD in CD for profit?? Probably not.

Re: selling bsd in cd for profit??

2010/2/27 Kit Halsted : > On Feb 26, 2010, at 6:44 PM, Citra Cool wrote: >> Can I selling openBSD in CD for profit?? > > Probably not. You can sell the official CDs. Best Martin

Re: Need advice re: Wistron CM9 and Net 4501

Aaron Mason [simplersolut...@gmail.com] wrote: > > Firstly, the scanning issue. The CM9 is an industrial card designed > for use in wireless links and in IBSS networks. They don't have the > ability to search for other access points - they're meant to BE an > access point. > Bullshit. It's ju

Re: selling bsd in cd for profit??

On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 4:44 PM, Citra Cool wrote: > Can I selling openBSD in CD for profit?? The OpenBSD project has a hard enough time making money on the CDs they're selling to fund the project. But, give this a read anyway. http://openbsd.org/policy.html

Re: selling bsd in cd for profit??

Let me clear on this. Yes you can. Follow the BSD licence terms (none of which say anything about for profit) and you are fine. There is absolutely zero legal reason you cannot put together a cd of OpenBSD and sell it. The official CD has some further licencing restrictions, so if you were to co

Re: selling bsd in cd for profit??

On 27/02/2010, at 3:04 PM, Joel Wiramu Pauling wrote: > Let me clear on this. > > Yes you can. > > Follow the BSD licence terms (none of which say anything about for > profit) and you are fine. > > There is absolutely zero legal reason you cannot put together a cd of > OpenBSD and sell it. The off

Re: selling bsd in cd for profit??

2010/2/27 Richard Toohey : > "No problem"? Maybe not (I don't know) a legal/licence problem, but you are > biting the hand that feeds / killing the golden goose. It's not nice, but legal. And people doing this should wear asbestos here. Best Martin

Re: selling bsd in cd for profit??

I am not saying that it is in the spirit of the project. Just saying that there is nothing wrong nor preventing you from doing so under the BSD licence. Don't like it? fine. Take your time to a project using a different licence.

Re: selling bsd in cd for profit??

On 2/26/10, Martin SchrC6der wrote: > 2010/2/27 Richard Toohey : >> "No problem"? Maybe not (I don't know) a legal/licence problem, but you > are >> biting the hand that feeds / killing the golden goose. > > It's not nice, but legal. And people doing this should wear asbestos here. > > Best >

Re: selling bsd in cd for profit??

On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 03:37:10PM +1300, Joel Wiramu Pauling wrote: > I am not saying that it is in the spirit of the project. > > Just saying that there is nothing wrong nor preventing you from doing > so under the BSD licence. Don't like it? fine. Take your time to a > project using a different

Re: selling bsd in cd for profit??

2010/2/26 Carl Trachte > On 2/26/10, Martin SchrC6der wrote: > > 2010/2/27 Richard Toohey : > >> "No problem"? Maybe not (I don't know) a legal/licence problem, but you > > are > >> biting the hand that feeds / killing the golden goose. > > > > It's not nice, but legal. And people doing this sh

Acer Aspire One D250-1838 mouse problem

Short Story: I have an Acer Aspire One D250-1838 whose trackpad mouse stops working after a couple of seconds on OpenBSD 4.3 and later, including all current snapshots. The mouse works fine on OpenBSD 4.0 to 4.2. The mouse behaves correctly when running 'od /dev/wsmouse' for a couple of seconds o

Re: selling bsd in cd for profit??

On Friday 26 February 2010 21:25:51 Richard Toohey wrote: > On 27/02/2010, at 3:04 PM, Joel Wiramu Pauling wrote: > > Let me clear on this. > > > > Yes you can. > > > > Follow the BSD licence terms (none of which say anything about for > > profit) and you are fine. > > > > There is absolutely zero

Re: selling bsd in cd for profit??

Yea for Steve! Mehma === On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 6:37 PM, STeve Andre' wrote: > On Friday 26 February 2010 21:25:51 Richard Toohey wrote: > > On 27/02/2010, at 3:04 PM, Joel Wiramu Pauling wrote: > > > Let me clear on this. > > > > > > Yes you can. > > > > > > Follow the BSD licence terms (none

Re: selling bsd in cd for profit??

On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 09:37:38PM -0500, STeve Andre' wrote: > I don't. A lot of people are genuinely confused & curious about this BSD > thing, the operating system and license. The number of times I've explained > (or tried to) the BSD license vs. GPL numbers in the dozens now. You could sell

Re: selling bsd in cd for profit??

On Sat, 27 Feb 2010 02:12:53 -0300, Victor Tarabola Cortiano wrote: >On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 09:37:38PM -0500, STeve Andre' wrote: >> I don't. A lot of people are genuinely confused & curious about this BSD >> thing, the operating system and license. The number of times I've explained >> (or tri

Re: managing routes for multiple PPPoE connections

On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 9:56 PM, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2010-02-26, Edwin Eyan Moragas wrote: >> On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 6:28 AM, Stuart Henderson >> wrote: >>> ah, the thing that mightn't have been apparent with my suggestion >>> of route-to, is that my default route points out of a norm

Re: selling bsd in cd for profit??

On 27 February 2010 01:44, Citra Cool wrote: > Can I selling openBSD in CD for profit?? I'm not sure if I understand your question. Are you: (a) asking if you can (re-)sell legally obtained official OpenBSD CDs for a profit, or are you (b) asking if you can copy official OpenBSD CDs and sell th

Re: Badly formatted output for man -k

On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 11:48:50PM +0100, Tomas Bodzar wrote: > Hi all, > > I installed jre-1.7.0 from packages and add directories to > /etc/man.conf, but when using 'man -k' I can see some messed output. > Is it correct output for those man pages or is is something broken in > my /etc/man.conf ?

Re: Badly formatted output for man -k

Ok, I will write to maintainer of port. I found that eg. this messed part This (1) - document discusses using the Java IDL Transient Naming Service, \f2tnameserv. Java IDL also includes the Object Request is in /usr/local/jre-1.7.0/man/man1/tnameserv.1 and was generated by html2man On Sat, Feb