On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 9:56 PM, Stuart Henderson <s...@spacehopper.org> wrote: > On 2010-02-26, Edwin Eyan Moragas <haa...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 6:28 AM, Stuart Henderson <s...@spacehopper.org> >> wrote: >>> ah, the thing that mightn't have been apparent with my suggestion >>> of route-to, is that my default route points out of a normal >>> ethernet interface, which stays up all the time >> >> so i guess i should remove the callout from hostname.pppoe to adding a >> default route? >> >> thank you for the assist. :) > > it's slightly more complicated, as you have to have *some* default > route otherwise the packets don't get as far as PF, so the route-to > rules can't be used. >
ugh! getting more complicated. can i grovel at your feet and ask for a simplified sample for hostname.pppoe and pf.conf?
