On 2009-12-31, J.C. Roberts wrote:
> The right answer is backup your data, and do a fresh install of the
> most recent -CURRENT snapshot.
Just a standard upgrade to a -current snapshot would also be fine.
On 2009-12-30, Tasmanian Devil wrote:
> Changes in version 0.2.1.21 - 2009-12-21
> o Majo
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-m...@openbsd.org [mailto:owner-m...@openbsd.org] On
> Behalf Of Brad Tilley
> Sent: Friday, January 01, 2010 7:49 PM
> To: OpenBSD Misc
> Subject: Re: 802.11n cards for AP?
>
> On Fri, 01 Jan 2010 19:16 -0500, "Steven M. Caesare"
> wrote:
> > So... back i
I didn't want to bother all of them with e-mails so hopefully if any of them
see this post, they might respond. Or if someone knows which models they are
using they can let me know.
A lot of answers eg. here
http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&w=2&r=1&s=developer+laptop&q=b and
info from this page http://www.openbsd.org/want.html : Laptops. These
die often enough that our developers need about 2-3 replacements a
year. is somewhat descriptive too.
On Sat, Jan 2, 2010 at 5:03 PM,
Sorry if this shows up again. I sent this twice yesterday and for some
reason it hasn't appeared on the list.
David Gwynne wrote:
id try this on a sili(4), ahci(4), or mpi(4) controller and see what happens.
my guess is you're hitting issues in the ata stack, specifically to do with the
block
Hi everybody.
I've been searching a lot about the BCM4312 support under OpenBSD, but
sadly, I haven't found any information. The bwi driver is supposed to
work with bcm43xx devices, but looking at dmesg output I see that the
kernel identifies wich device I'm using but doesn't load the driver.
This
2010/1/2 Vijay Sankar :
> Cortex wrote:
>>
>> Hi everybody.
>>
>> I've been searching a lot about the BCM4312 support under OpenBSD, but
>> sadly, I haven't found any information. The bwi driver is supposed to
>> work with bcm43xx devices, but looking at dmesg output I see that the
>> kernel identi
I was checking the output of dmesg again and noticed that it says:
"Broadcom Integrated HP Module" rev 2.00/1.00
Now I don't know what to think :E
On Sat, 2 Jan 2010, Scott McEachern wrote:
# date; time dd if=/dev/rwd0c of=/dev/null; date
Thu Dec 31 23:44:32 EST 2009
dd: /dev/rwd0c: Input/output error
268435455+0 records in
268435455+0 records out
137438952960 bytes transferred in 23954.900 secs (5737404 bytes/sec)
399m14.93s real 2m12
Hi,
Cortex wrote:
> 02:00.0 Network controller [0280]: Broadcom Corporation BCM4312
> 802.11b/g [14e4:4315] (rev 01)
BCM4312 *rev 1* should work with bwi(4), the output from "lspci" does
indeed confirm that.. but you'll need to post *OpenBSD* dmesg output
here so we have a chance of figuring thin
We use Hudson to manage builds.
It uses Java.
It looks like there's nothing viable here for OpenBSD other than x86 and
AMD64?
I already have OpenBSD/x86 working.
I have Linux/ppc, maybe Linux/sparc working.
There's a "zero assembly" project that has eased things, but
the web page says it is gcc and
David Vasek wrote:
Out of curiosity, does the same happen if you dd from /dev/rwd0d?
As Matthew Szudzik pointed out, dd is failing when it attempts to read
(2^28)th sector of the current device you are reading from. Up to,
including, 2^28-1 everything is ok.
Regards,
David
I made an erro
Hello,
I've got spamd working well (it's very cool!)...
Sometimes I see in pftop a state entry that shows spamd has a very old
connection that is actively still passing traffic (lasts for hours)...
I was able to capture one of these as it began (using tcpdump).
Here's what the trace shows (in di
If I upgrade to -current, don't I risk stability and security issues;
or are the chances of that are very low as far as this OS goes? Long
time ago I did try development versions of NetBSD and FreeBSD because
I needed support for hardware that -stable didn't have, and they were
quite shaky. Or do y
Probably a bit premature to be asking this since I won't be able to physically
access the machine until Monday, but here goes ...
I have a machine that I admin remotely running 4.6 with all the patches. It's
a firewall only machine with 6 ethernet interfaces, 4 of which are active,
and has been
I am trying to use a USB 2.0 Gigabit Ethernet adapter
axe0 at uhub1 port 1 configuration 1 interface 0 "ASIX Electronics
AX88178" rev 2.00/0.01 addr 2
axe0: AX88178, address 00:80:c8:ff:ff:a1
ukphy0 at axe0 phy 0: Generic IEEE 802.3u media interface, rev. 9: OUI
0x1e525e, model 0x0014
$ ifco
Hi,
I know not everyone uses OpenBSD for a desktop OS, but I have been for
nearly 5 years and I'm quite curious about some of your opinions? do you
embrace minimalism or pure aesthetics? are the two mutually exclusive?
When I started using OpenBSD (..around 3.7) I was frequently switching
betwee
As anounced in undeadly.org i've started trying pcc for little things
and personal sources and in case of find bugs, report them. But this
issue seems more like i'm missing something.
My box it's a fresh OpenBSD 4.6 relase install (i've tested this issue
in other machine with a fresh install)
Th
OpenBSD-STABLE with fluxbox on my work desktop. I have a laptop with a
busted LCD and keyboard, so I use it as a WinXP slave via rdesktop for
running IE (checking websites, as I work in IT for a hosting company). The
XP box runs in seamless mode, so fluxbox looks a bit weird with a Windows
task b
On Sat, January 2, 2010 23:03, Vijay Sankar wrote:
> I am trying to use a USB 2.0 Gigabit Ethernet adapter
>
> axe0 at uhub1 port 1 configuration 1 interface 0 "ASIX Electronics
> AX88178" rev 2.00/0.01 addr 2
> axe0: AX88178, address 00:80:c8:ff:ff:a1
> ukphy0 at axe0 phy 0: Generic IEEE 802.3u me
Forgot to send to list.
Josh
- Forwarded message from Josh Rickmar -
Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2010 21:29:50 +
From: Josh Rickmar
To: Brynet
Subject: Re: What does your environment look like?
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
On Sat, Jan 02, 2010 at 09:08:38PM -0500, Brynet wrote:
> Hi
On Sat, Jan 2, 2010 at 16:04, Josh Rickmar wrote:
> dmenu
>
>> * Do you try to keep things uniform across other desktops?
>
> I'm on a laptop, not so much of an issue. Otherwise I would.
>
>> * What does your environment look like? anyone willing to post
>> screenshots or actual workspace photos?
Brynet wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I know not everyone uses OpenBSD for a desktop OS, but I have been for
> nearly 5 years and I'm quite curious about some of your opinions? do you
> embrace minimalism or pure aesthetics? are the two mutually exclusive?
>
> When I started using OpenBSD (..around 3.7) I was
El 03/01/2010 3:41, Jesus Sanchez escribis:
As anounced in undeadly.org i've started trying pcc for little things
and personal sources and in case of find bugs, report them. But this
issue seems more like i'm missing something.
My box it's a fresh OpenBSD 4.6 relase install (i've tested this iss
On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 12:08 AM, Brynet wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I know not everyone uses OpenBSD for a desktop OS, but I have been for
> nearly 5 years and I'm quite curious about some of your opinions? do you
> embrace minimalism or pure aesthetics? are the two mutually exclusive?
>
> When I started us
On Sat, Jan 2, 2010 at 6:51 PM, J Sisson wrote:
> OpenBSD-STABLE with fluxbox on my work desktop. I have a laptop with a
> busted LCD and keyboard, so I use it as a WinXP slave via rdesktop for
> running IE (checking websites, as I work in IT for a hosting company). The
> XP box runs in seamless
On Sat, Jan 02, 2010 at 09:08:38PM -0500, Brynet wrote:
> Anyone feel like humouring me? :-)
ScrotWM on OpenBSD-stable. The mouse is only useful for, y'know, selecting
which xterm to type into (though tmux is lovely enough for me to stick to
a single term).
--
Key ID: 493FB6AE
Key fing
I can compare OpenBSD to dev versions of OpenSolaris, DragonflyBSD,
NetBSD or some stable Linux distro and I must say that OpenBSD is more
stable and useful in its current version then any other OS in its
stable version. Read this http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq5.html#Flavors
and especially this par
29 matches
Mail list logo
