On Wed, 25 Feb 2009 03:12:09 +0700, Claudio Jeker
wrote:
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 08:37:22AM +0700, Insan Praja SW wrote:
On Tue, 24 Feb 2009 06:20:05 +0700, Claudio Jeker
wrote:
Could you please run with the following diff and report if you still
hit
the panics. It seems some drivers (m
On 25 fivr. 09, at 07:17, Jack Woehr wrote:
Anyone working with TBB ( http://www.threadingbuildingblocks.org/ )
on OpenBSD?
http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-ports&m=122559493912076&w=2
On 25 February 2009 c. 08:51:20 Jerome Santos wrote:
> hello, I want to put a php script in a site on an openbsd 4.2
> webserver. From what I understand because apache is chrooted, a
> function that uses an exec to a system call cannot work.
> ie.
> $s = explode( " ", exec("/var/run/usr/bi
On Tue, 24 Feb 2009, Dieter wrote:
http://linuxdevices.com/news/NS9634061300.html
This looks promising: a $100 ($50 in volume) 5 Watt computer.
1.2GHz CPU, 512MB each of RAM and Flash
Marvell 88F6281 "Kirkwood" SoC
gigabit Ethernet and USB 2.0 ports
Looks like the SoC also has a 2nd Ethernet p
David Vasek wrote:
> What would be firewire good for?
Data transfer such as for full backups or cloning or audio/video.
Haven't tested it yet on OpenBSD, I still have USB-only / ethernet-base
storage for those systems. Subjectively, I find FW to be much faster
than USB2 on my hardware using OS X
On Tue, 24 Feb 2009 22:16:10 +0100 Matthieu Herrb
wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 9:20 PM, J.C. Roberts
> wrote:
> > I'm testing out the v2.6.1 intel(4) driver requested here:
> > http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-tech&m=123307709522306&w=2
> >
> > In my Xorg.0.log I'm getting the mysterious error:
>
On Wed, 25 Feb 2009, Lars Noodin wrote:
> David Vasek wrote:
>> What would be firewire good for?
>
> Data transfer such as for full backups or cloning or audio/video.
> Haven't tested it yet on OpenBSD, I still have USB-only / ethernet-base
> storage for those systems. Subjectively, I find FW to
On Wed, 25 Feb 2009 12:26:05 +0200, Lars Nood+*n wrote:
>David Vasek wrote:
>> What would be firewire good for?
>
>Data transfer such as for full backups or cloning or audio/video.
>Haven't tested it yet on OpenBSD, I still have USB-only / ethernet-base
>storage for those systems. Subjectively, I
David Vasek wrote:
> 1) Firewire controller in your machine is a realiable path to have it
> cracked/crashed at any time (on most of the platforms).
Sources please, regarding cracking.
As far as stability goes, I find the USB connections somewhat unreliable.
> 2) Firewire is not supported on Ope
On Tue, 24 Feb 2009, Hilco Wijbenga wrote:
2009/2/23 Jason Dixon :
##
00 ext_if = "sk0"
01 int_if = "sk1"
02
03 set skip on lo
04
05 scrub in
06
07 nat on $ext_if from $int_if:network to any -> ($ext_if:0)
08
09 block in log all
10 pass in
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 11:26 AM, Lars Noodin
wrote:
> David Vasek wrote:
>> What would be firewire good for?
>
> Data transfer such as for full backups or cloning or audio/video.
> Haven't tested it yet on OpenBSD, I still have USB-only / ethernet-base
> storage for those systems. Subjectively,
Hi,
i have a proxy server (4.4 amd64 + squid) with foreign ip addresses in
routing table.
example:
# uname -a
OpenBSD proxy.cs.intra 4.4 GENERIC#1021 i386
# netstat -nr -f inet
Routing tables
Internet:
DestinationGatewayFlags Refs Use Mtu Prio Iface
default
Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2009-02-24, Gregory Edigarov wrote:
Is this a bug of feature?
the test case:
# ifconfig lo1 192.168.0.1 up
# ping 192.168.0.1
64 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=0 ttl=255 time=0.200 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=255 time=0.111 ms
64 bytes from 192
On Wed, 25 Feb 2009, Lars Noodin wrote:
> David Vasek wrote:
>> 1) Firewire controller in your machine is a realiable path to have it
>> cracked/crashed at any time (on most of the platforms).
>
> Sources please, regarding cracking.
With firewire OHCI controller you have you physical RAM open. Th
Rod Whitworth wrote:
> And you are aware of how insecure firewire is, I hope?
Yeah, somewhat.
> With physical access admittedly
Pretty much anything is possible with physical access and some time.
> ... but it does DMA transfers without talking to the OS etc.
It appears that could be turned
I'am configuring ospfd on FreeBSD 6.4
I want transfer, for exmple x.x.x.0/24, network to cisco routers with the
next config:
# cat /usr/local/etc/ospfd.conf
# Global Configuration
router-id yy.yy.yy.yy
redistribute zz.zz.zz.0/27 (ospfd host and cisco network)
redistribute x.x.x.0/24
area 0.0.0.
Dave Wilson wrote:
> http://linuxdevices.com/news/NS9634061300.html
Marvell Semiconductor, eh?
> They look rather nifty.
>
> Even the hardware design is to be released under some sort of open license.
a company with a spotty history on "open" -- see malo(4)
("spotty" is giving them a benefit of
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 2:41 AM, Saifi Khan wrote:
> So, what is the plan for openBSD now ? Are we not going to have
> BCM43xx driver at all ?
Take it up with broadcom. Why is it our fault if they don't document
their crap?
Hi!
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 12:44:29PM +0200, Lars Noodin wrote:
>As far as stability goes, I find the USB connections somewhat unreliable.
For me it just works (external USB2 hard disk).
Kind regards,
Hannah.
Hi!
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 12:04:01PM +0100, David Vasek wrote:
>[...]
>Perhaps. In case of firewire it depends on proper design of a connected
>device too, but I meant stability of your machine/OS. A device connected
>over firewire can do anything it wants with your machine, even crash it
>u
On Wed, 25 Feb 2009, Hannah Schroeter wrote:
Hi!
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 12:04:01PM +0100, David Vasek wrote:
[...]
Perhaps. In case of firewire it depends on proper design of a connected
device too, but I meant stability of your machine/OS. A device connected
over firewire can do anything
Will disabling apmd solve this issue? I'm seeing freezes on my Lenovo
X61s. The machine was stable for a few weeks (or so) until Theo backed
out that backed-out commit on acpicpu.c on Monday (23rd).
Andreas
2009/2/13 Dan Harnett :
> On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 11:46:37AM -0600, Marco Peereboom wrote
apmd will only make it worse. Plugging in the power cable under io is
an easy way to reproduce the issue.
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 01:36:16PM +, Andreas Kahari wrote:
> Will disabling apmd solve this issue? I'm seeing freezes on my Lenovo
> X61s. The machine was stable for a few weeks (or so)
On Wed, 25 Feb 2009 13:36:16 +
Andreas Kahari wrote:
> Will disabling apmd solve this issue? I'm seeing freezes on my Lenovo
> X61s. The machine was stable for a few weeks (or so) until Theo backed
> out that backed-out commit on acpicpu.c on Monday (23rd).
>
> Andreas
Try building kernel
Hey!
There will be an OpenBSD booth at the "Chemnitzer Linuxtage 2009" in
Chemnitz, Germany.
If there are any locals interested in helping at the booth please
contact be...@openbsd.org or f...@openbsd.org privately.
Thanks!
Regards,
Bernd
2009/2/25 Robert :
> On Wed, 25 Feb 2009 13:36:16 +
> Andreas Kahari wrote:
>
>> Will disabling apmd solve this issue? I'm seeing freezes on my Lenovo
>> X61s. The machine was stable for a few weeks (or so) until Theo backed
>> out that backed-out commit on acpicpu.c on Monday (23rd).
>>
>> A
Dear Friedrich,
We offer dedicated servers at ipv4.net
If you are interested let me know
Regards,
Marcos Laufer
Francisco Valladolid Hdez. wrote:
> Hi
>
> Consider www.geekisp.com I have a account with Dave for almost, three years
> without problems.
>
> www.rootr.net can be a nice solution.
>
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 01:05:17PM -0200, Marcos Laufer wrote:
> Dear Friedrich,
>
> We offer dedicated servers at ipv4.net
> If you are interested let me know
Does ipv4.net offer ipv6?
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 9:22 AM, Andreas Kahari
wrote:
> That's exactly what I have as well in my dmesg with a kernel built
> from today's sources, well, almost:
>
> cpu0: unknown Enhanced SpeedStep CPU, msr 0x0615081906000615
> cpu0: using only highest and lowest power states
> cpu0: Enhanced Spe
Hi Claudio and Misc@,
On Wed, 25 Feb 2009 03:12:09 +0700, Claudio Jeker
wrote:
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 08:37:22AM +0700, Insan Praja SW wrote:
On Tue, 24 Feb 2009 06:20:05 +0700, Claudio Jeker
wrote:
Could you please run with the following diff and report if you still
hit
the panics. I
If you do find one in the UK, please let us know!
Or at any rate, could you fire me a mail? :P
I too am UK based. The only placse I can think that may sell them
anytime soon are possibly Maplins or MicroAnvika. :|
But they don't have a tendency to be cheap. I hope we see it on
PCWorld's shelv
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 11:43:36AM +0100, Cristiano Deana wrote:
> Hi,
>
> i have a proxy server (4.4 amd64 + squid) with foreign ip addresses in
> routing table.
>
> example:
>
> # uname -a
> OpenBSD proxy.cs.intra 4.4 GENERIC#1021 i386
> # netstat -nr -f inet
> Routing tables
>
> Internet:
>
On Tue, 24 Feb 2009 23:38:43 + Owain Ainsworth
wrote:
> > I just singed up for freedesktop.org this morning, and I'm
> > collecting the needed Xorg.0.log's with full debug info,
> > descriptions and whatnot. It's going to take quite a while
> > experiment with it and write up all the buggy be
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 3:40 AM, Saifi Khan wrote:
> Hi all:
>
> i'm facing keyboard access issue when trying to install OpenBSD 4.4 on
> Intel, Compaq laptop.
> Please find attached the photograph of the dmesg output.
>
> Both FreeBSD 7.1 and Gentoo Linux 2008.0r2 work fine on the system.
>
> Her
Thanks Jens.
I just uploaded the image at
http://tinypic.com/view.php?pic=30b0bvl&s=5
--
thanks
Saifi.
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 7:02 PM, ropers wrote:
> 2009/2/25 Saifi Khan :
>> Folks, any suggestions on how the keyboard issue can be fixed ?
>> I did send out a screenshot of the dmesg output.
Hi all:
Here is the link to the openbsd dmesg output image.
http://tinypic.com/view.php?pic=30b0bvl&s=5
--
thanks
Saifi.
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 3:40 AM, Saifi Khan wrote:
> Hi all:
>
> i'm facing keyboard access issue when trying to install OpenBSD 4.4 on
> Intel, Compaq laptop.
> Please fi
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 02:04:32PM +0200, Andrew R. wrote:
> I'am configuring ospfd on FreeBSD 6.4
>
> I want transfer, for exmple x.x.x.0/24, network to cisco routers with the
> next config:
>
> # cat /usr/local/etc/ospfd.conf
> # Global Configuration
> router-id yy.yy.yy.yy
>
> redistribute zz
Hi all. I just recently starting using OpenBSD 4.4 since I wanted to
use "pf" for a firewall. I usually use FreeBSD, but had problems with
their implementation of relayd. Anyway...here's my problem. I'm
running 2 boxes, using CARP and pfsync for failover, and relayd for
load balancing incoming
Hi guys.
I'm helping a friend install 4.4 (Sparc64) on this SunFire V120 he got for
free :) It's a very nice box with a working Solaris install. It boots the
install.iso and proceeds to install, but when we get to the point of
selecting a root disk... the only option we have is [done]. OpenBSD see
On Feb 25, 2009, at 12:18 PM, new_guy wrote:
Hi guys.
I'm helping a friend install 4.4 (Sparc64) on this SunFire V120 he
got for
free :) It's a very nice box with a working Solaris install. It
boots the
install.iso and proceeds to install, but when we get to the point of
selecting a root d
Hi All,
I actually built the following system :
- OpenBSD running on a standard AMD platform
- This box is actually used as firewall
- This box is also used as webserver
- This box is finally used as local shared drives via NFS file but only
open to subnetwork through PF
Assuming that subnetwork
new_guy wrote:
Hi guys.
I'm helping a friend install 4.4 (Sparc64) on this SunFire V120 he got for
free :) It's a very nice box with a working Solaris install. It boots the
install.iso and proceeds to install, but when we get to the point of
selecting a root disk... the only option we have is [d
Hallmark.comShop OnlineHallmark MagazineE-Cards & MoreAt Gold
Crown
You have recieved A Hallmark E-Card.
Hello!
You have recieved a Hallmark E-Card.
To see it, click here,
There's something special about that E-Card feeling. We invite you to
make a friend's day and send one.
Hope to see you s
Nick Holland wrote:
> Dave Wilson wrote:
>> http://linuxdevices.com/news/NS9634061300.html
>
> Marvell Semiconductor, eh?
>
>> They look rather nifty.
>>
>> Even the hardware design is to be released under some sort of open license.
>
> a company with a spotty history on "open" -- see malo(4)
>
A few days ago Robert Nagy (the OpenOffice.org port maintainer) added his
request for a build box to www.openbsd.org/want.html.
OpenOffice.org 3 is a huge port to build and maintain, and a single build
takes over 12 hours on the machine that Robert currently has and cannot
afford to run anymore d
Brian Keefer wrote:
>
> That's weird. I have a nearly identical machine with almost the same
> configuration. The only difference without checking dmesg line-by-
> line is that mine has one disk drive rather than two. I'll check my
> dmesg when I get home.
>
Thanks for the help guys. We
Even though this reminder is appreciated I am currently working with
Robert on an alternate solution to get him a fast build box. We really
need donation funds to go to CVS & Network upgrade at this time.
Don't be shy to shoot me an email if you have any questions.
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 10:51
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 10:08 PM, Jean-Francois wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I actually built the following system :
>
> - OpenBSD running on a standard AMD platform
> - This box is actually used as firewall
> - This box is also used as webserver
> - This box is finally used as local shared drives via NFS
> On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 3:40 AM, Saifi Khan wrote:
>> Hi all:
>>
>> i'm facing keyboard access issue when trying to install OpenBSD 4.4 on
>> Intel, Compaq laptop.
>> Both FreeBSD 7.1 and Gentoo Linux 2008.0r2 work fine on the system.
>>
>> Here is the information that i culled from the Linux e
Marc Balmer wrote:
I am using a TNC7multi. http://nt-g.de/de/tnc7multi/tnc7multi.php5
The venerable KPC-3 from Kantronics is always a good choice as well.
http://www.kantronics.com/products/kpc3.html
--
Joseph Bender
N8XRE
Untitled Document
Newsletter Vebqouaq_ou 2009
Diav^lisg & Tewmokoc_a
APC Smart - UPS SC 1000VA 230V
2U Rackmount/Tower
APC Smart-UPS SC, 600 Watts/1000VA,
Input 230V/Output 230V, Rack Height 2U
INCLUDES: CD with software, Documentation CD,
Rack Mounting brackets, Smart UPS signallin
2009/2/25 Jean-Francois :
> -> Would you please confirm that hacking is almost impossible ?
> -> Would you confirm any personnal datas hosted on server are safe as
> long as the (subnet is not compromised by false manipulation of course)
I hate to state the obvious, but no one will be able to give
2009/2/25 Joseph C. Bender :
> Marc Balmer wrote:
>>
>> I am using a TNC7multi. http://nt-g.de/de/tnc7multi/tnc7multi.php5
>>
>
> The venerable KPC-3 from Kantronics is always a good choice as well.
>
> http://www.kantronics.com/products/kpc3.html
Apologies if this is very naive and thoroughly un
2009/2/25 patrick keshishian :
> On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 9:48 PM, Hilco Wijbenga
> wrote:
>> 2009/2/23 Jason Dixon :
>>> ##
>>> 00 ext_if = "sk0"
>>> 01 int_if = "sk1"
>>> 02
>>> 03 set skip on lo
>>> 04
>>> 05 scrub in
>>> 06
>>> 07 nat on $
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 4:07 PM, ropers wrote:
> 2009/2/25 patrick keshishian :
>> On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 9:48 PM, Hilco Wijbenga
>> wrote:
>>> 2009/2/23 Jason Dixon :
##
00 ext_if = "sk0"
01 int_if = "sk1"
02
03 se
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 01:07:22AM -0800, J.C. Roberts wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Feb 2009 22:16:10 +0100 Matthieu Herrb
> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 9:20 PM, J.C. Roberts
> > wrote:
> > > I'm testing out the v2.6.1 intel(4) driver requested here:
> > > http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-tech&m=1233
On Wed, 25 Feb 2009 16:39:08 -0800, patrick keshishian wrote:
>You need states created for traffic passing through the pf firewall,
>specifically through the $ext_if to allow packets flowing back in,
>otherwise line 09 blocks those packets. I don't see where states would
>get created for outbound
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 10:17:09AM -0500, Ted Unangst wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 9:22 AM, Andreas Kahari
> wrote:
> > That's exactly what I have as well in my dmesg with a kernel built
> > from today's sources, well, almost:
> >
> > cpu0: unknown Enhanced SpeedStep CPU, msr 0x061508190600061
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 04:39:08PM -0800, patrick keshishian wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 4:07 PM, ropers wrote:
> > 2009/2/25 patrick keshishian :
> >> On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 9:48 PM, Hilco Wijbenga
> >> wrote:
> >>> 2009/2/23 Jason Dixon :
> ###
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 5:15 PM, Jason Dixon wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 04:39:08PM -0800, patrick keshishian wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 4:07 PM, ropers wrote:
>> > 2009/2/25 patrick keshishian :
>> >> On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 9:48 PM, Hilco Wijbenga
>> >> wrote:
>> >>> 2009/2/23 Jaso
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 10:17:09AM -0500, Ted Unangst wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 9:22 AM, Andreas Kahari
> wrote:
> > That's exactly what I have as well in my dmesg with a kernel built
> > from today's sources, well, almost:
> >
> > cpu0: unknown Enhanced SpeedStep CPU, msr 0x061508190600061
>It's a shame I don't have this kind of luck with lottery tickets. I'm
>able to reproduce the hang still using both -current and the latest
>amd64 snap. To reproduce, I just continuously scp a large file to
>another machine while 'apmd -C' is running. 'apmd -L', 'apmd -H', or
>not running apmd w
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 08:36:22PM -0500, Dan Harnett wrote:
>
> I'm 2 for 2. I can reproduce the hang on my Lenovo ThinkPad T61 as
> well. I'm gonna go hit up a casino.
Using em0, btw. pf disabled.
em0: flags=8843 mtu 1500
lladdr 00:1c:25:78:07:ba
priority: 0
groups: e
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 05:39:31PM -0800, patrick keshishian wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 5:15 PM, Jason Dixon wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 04:39:08PM -0800, patrick keshishian wrote:
> >> On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 4:07 PM, ropers wrote:
> >> > 2009/2/25 patrick keshishian :
> >> >> On Tu
On Wed, 25 Feb 2009 17:39:31 -0800, patrick keshishian wrote:
>The floating states based on line 10 would be for pre-NAT sources on
>$int_if and wouldn't match any inbound packets on $ext_if. Unless I'm
>misunderstanding how NAT works with pf, there are no pass out rules
>that would create states
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 8:08 PM, Dan Harnett wrote:
> It's a shame I don't have this kind of luck with lottery tickets. I'm
> able to reproduce the hang still using both -current and the latest
> amd64 snap. To reproduce, I just continuously scp a large file to
> another machine while 'apmd -C'
Hi, these simple rules works for me !
Remember how good is the learning process !
I hope this can help !
ext_if="vr0"
dmz_if="sis1"
int_if="sis0"
ext_ip="123.45.67.89"
#Don't Filter on the loopback interface
set block-policy drop
set skip on lo
#NORMALIZACION DE PAQUETES
scrub in all
scrub
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 01:14:43PM +1100, Rod Whitworth wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Feb 2009 17:39:31 -0800, patrick keshishian wrote:
>
> >The floating states based on line 10 would be for pre-NAT sources on
> >$int_if and wouldn't match any inbound packets on $ext_if. Unless I'm
> >misunderstanding how
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 09:07:52PM -0500, Ted Unangst wrote:
> Ok, there are several code points here, and I'm having trouble keeping
> track of them all and who's machine worked how when.
>
> First, there's A. This is the code that shipped in 4.4.
> Then we have B. This was the code that went i
Hi Misc@,
I understand that we can have vlan priority on vlan interfaces. My
question is, can OpenBSD process these 802.1p tags for CoS/QoS purposes?
In PF we can mark/tag/process traffic by its DSCP code. Can we do
something like this with VLAN Priority?
Thanks,
Insan
--
insandotpraja(at)
On Wed, 25 Feb 2009 21:27:24 -0500, Jason Dixon wrote:
>On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 01:14:43PM +1100, Rod Whitworth wrote:
>> On Wed, 25 Feb 2009 17:39:31 -0800, patrick keshishian wrote:
>>
>> >The floating states based on line 10 would be for pre-NAT sources on
>> >$int_if and wouldn't match any in
I can comment from experience that the apmd changes only made it happen
quicker; it happened nonetheless just less frequent. I haven't tried D
yet on the laptop but I will do that right now.
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 09:48:34PM -0500, Dan Harnett wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 09:07:52PM -0500, T
I have a binary MP kernel for amd64 that I am willing to share with
people who want to test and make sure that we all test the same thing.
Contact me off list.
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 10:10:34PM -0600, Marco Peereboom wrote:
> I can comment from experience that the apmd changes only made it happe
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 03:05:07PM +1100, Rod Whitworth wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Feb 2009 21:27:24 -0500, Jason Dixon wrote:
>
> >The 'block in' will block return traffic since no state is matching for
> >outbound traffic (see prior emails about translation before filtering).
> >
> Oh dear! Then you me
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 8:05 PM, Rod Whitworth wrote:
> Now there is a difference. In case you missed it - I used "pass out"
> not "pass out on $ext_if" but that make no difference, in fact as I
> pointed out earlier there is no "block out" for anything in the ruleset
> so you can remove the "pass
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 8:45 PM, Jason Dixon wrote:
> I'll agree with you here. B Patrick makes a good point in that
> translation rules always apply before filter rules and that *should*
> take effect here as well (nat outbound). B However, after thinking about
> it a bit more, we usually apply t
2009/2/26 patrick keshishian :
> On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 8:05 PM, Rod Whitworth wrote:
>> Now there is a difference. In case you missed it - I used "pass out"
>> not "pass out on $ext_if" but that make no difference, in fact as I
>> pointed out earlier there is no "block out" for anything in the r
2009/2/26 Ted Unangst :
> The looping sound is very common whenever a machine freezes. The
> sound chip has a small buffer, and until told otherwise, will just
> keep playing it.
Yeah, for the record, this pretty much happens in all OSes, whenever
something sound-related crashes badly. Happens in
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 06:47:23AM +0100, ropers wrote:
> 2009/2/26 patrick keshishian :
> > On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 8:05 PM, Rod Whitworth wrote:
> >> Now there is a difference. In case you missed it - I used "pass out"
> >> not "pass out on $ext_if" but that make no difference, in fact as I
> >>
Am 26.02.2009 um 00:27 schrieb ropers:
2009/2/25 Joseph C. Bender :
Marc Balmer wrote:
I am using a TNC7multi. http://nt-g.de/de/tnc7multi/tnc7multi.php5
The venerable KPC-3 from Kantronics is always a good choice as well.
http://www.kantronics.com/products/kpc3.html
Apologies if this
80 matches
Mail list logo
