Top Shop
E=elimo da Vam u Novoj godini dani budu sreDni i zdravi, ispunjeni
uspehom, osmesima i zadovoljstvom.
SreDnu 2009. Vam E>eli
Top Shop Tim
Kliknite za poklon e-knjigu!
Top Shop
Ovu elektronsku poE!tu primate, ukoliko ste svojevoljno ostavili svoju
e-mail adresu, uD
estvovali u posebn
Hi all,
I wanted to stay in touch with a friend that is currently a few thousand
kilometers away from home tomorrow using a webcam on my laptop. Sadly he
only has Windows Live Messenger and doesn't want to use soemthing else..
I've tried serveral things now, but couldn't get the webcam to wor
* Douglas A. Tutty [2008-12-30 02:39]:
> > crappy applications are still crappy applications on OpenBSD, but
> > worse on pretty much any other OS.
> IIUC, with ports right now, to get security fixes you have to run
> current and then you end up getting the latest verions of the upstream
the lack
* Stuart Henderson [2008-12-30 02:56]:
> On 2008-12-29, Michiel van Baak wrote:
> > On 15:22, Mon 29 Dec 08, Marco Peereboom wrote:
> >> Those things crash more often than windows 3.11
> >
> >
> > I'm getting a bit annoyed by statements like this.
> > There are a lot of stable setups with virtual
2008/12/30 Henning Brauer :
> Virtualization promises isolation, and doesn't even remotely keep
> that promise, today, regardless of the implementation.
>
> That makes it, for now, both a security and relibility disaster.
Does that also hold for VM and similar implemenations (e.g. Solaris
partitio
fRANz escreveu:
Hi.
I've some trouble with this configuration:
LAN -- fw (openbsd 4.4) -- adsl router
LAN: 192.168.100.0/24
fw int int: sis1
fw int ind: 192.168.100.2
fw ext int: sis0
fw ext ind: 10.0.0.2
router int ind: 10.0.0.1
I try to configure pf to redirect all web traffic from internal
On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 01:45:49PM +0100, Martin Schr?der wrote:
> 2008/12/30 Henning Brauer :
> > Virtualization promises isolation, and doesn't even remotely keep
> > that promise, today, regardless of the implementation.
> >
> > That makes it, for now, both a security and relibility disaster.
>
On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 12:23 PM, Henning Brauer wrote:
> * Douglas A. Tutty [2008-12-30 02:39]:
> > > crappy applications are still crappy applications on OpenBSD, but
> > > worse on pretty much any other OS.
> > IIUC, with ports right now, to get security fixes you have to run
> > current and t
On 2008-12-30, Giancarlo Razzolini wrote:
> fRANz escreveu:
>> Hi.
>>
>> I've some trouble with this configuration:
>>
>> LAN -- fw (openbsd 4.4) -- adsl router
>>
>> LAN: 192.168.100.0/24
>> fw int int: sis1
>> fw int ind: 192.168.100.2
>> fw ext int: sis0
>> fw ext ind: 10.0.0.2
>> router int in
Stuart Henderson escreveu:
On 2008-12-30, Giancarlo Razzolini wrote:
fRANz escreveu:
Hi.
I've some trouble with this configuration:
LAN -- fw (openbsd 4.4) -- adsl router
LAN: 192.168.100.0/24
fw int int: sis1
fw int ind: 192.168.100.2
fw ext int: sis0
fw ext ind: 10.0.0.2
router in
Chris Cohen wrote:
Hi all,
I wanted to stay in touch with a friend that is currently a few thousand
kilometers away from home tomorrow using a webcam on my laptop. Sadly he
only has Windows Live Messenger and doesn't want to use soemthing else..
I've tried serveral things now, but couldn't g
Try writing hardware drivers on vmware and let me know how it went. A
good example is mpi; when we were developing that thing vmware blew up
because it couldn't respond to a configuration request. Simply put the
vitalization software only emulates certain parts of the hardware and as
soon as you
* Otto Moerbeek [2008-12-30 14:06]:
> On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 01:45:49PM +0100, Martin Schr?der wrote:
>
> > 2008/12/30 Henning Brauer :
> > > Virtualization promises isolation, and doesn't even remotely keep
> > > that promise, today, regardless of the implementation.
> > >
> > > That makes it,
Hi,
I have just updated from 4.3 to 4.4 on one of my boxes. All has gone
well except for the network device not being left up and running after
the machine has been booted.
The machine is running dhclient with the hostname file just containing
dhcp NONE NONE NONE. During the boot I see message
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I have a FAT32 disk on wd1i as a disk for interchange with other
computers. On every bootup I get the message "No space for FAT (Cannot
allocate memory)" and then get into a shell where I should check
manually. But I can mount the disk without any prob
I'm trying to use both AH and ESP to setup IPsec using Transport mode between
two IPv6 OpenBSD 4.4 hosts.
So far it worked for AH Transport mode or ESP Transport mode but I don't quite
know how to do both AH and ESP. Any ideas?
Here's a snippet from /etc/ipsec.conf :
ike esp transport from
2008/12/30 Thilo Pfennig :
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> I have a FAT32 disk on wd1i as a disk for interchange with other
> computers. On every bootup I get the message "No space for FAT (Cannot
> allocate memory)" and then get into a shell where I should check
> manually.
hello evrybody..anyone knows how i can install network manager on gnome?
thanks!
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/network-manager-tp21223616p21223616.html
Sent from the openbsd user - misc mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On 2008-12-30, Thilo Pfennig wrote:
>
> I have a FAT32 disk on wd1i as a disk for interchange with other
> computers. On every bootup I get the message "No space for FAT (Cannot
> allocate memory)" and then get into a shell where I should check
> manually.
This is coming from fsck_msdos. Either o
On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 4:46 PM, lordfabri wrote:
> hello evrybody..anyone knows how i can install network manager on gnome?
>
> thanks!
>
First: have you installed the associated gnome-* packages?
Second: judging from it's homepage
(http://projects.gnome.org/NetworkManager/) it seems pretty
linu
Hi.
I wonder if anyone is running mysqlBind (on OpenBSD of course...:-)
http://freshmeat.net/projects/mysqlbind/?branch_id=21571&release_id=290125
It seems to be a rather nice tool to manage Bind dns servers...
Best Regards
Anders
I did everything from the start, now i got this erros after "make obj"
===> usr.bin/tn3270/tools/mkdctype
/usr/src/usr.bin/tn3270/tools/mkdctype/obj ->
/usr/obj/usr.bin/tn3270/tools/mkdctype
===> usr.bin/tn3270/tn3270
echo: Input/output error
echo: Input/output error
echo: Input/output error
/u
Kernel have been compiled fine:
OpenBSD 4.4-stable (GENERIC) #0: Tue Dec 30 12:47:43 BRT 2008
But when rebuilding binaries, after "make build" i got:
===> games/backgammon
===> games/backgammon/backgammon
install -c -s -o root -g games -m 555 backgammon /usr/games/backgammon
install: /usr/games
Hello,
I wanted to know if it was possible to do the following with PF
(and/or a mixture of other OpenBSD services).
I would like to have an table of IP addresses with a port redirecting
to the table. Instead of a round robin behavior however I want the IP
address removed from the table when a se
On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 1:10 PM, Marco Matarazzo wrote:
>
> This is not true. It's more tricky, but you can actually limit both inbound
> and outbound at the port level, and it's quite effective too. Of course
Hello ]V[arco and all the others that responded to this question,
Sorry for taking
Hi there, using 4.4 stable.
I've found (I think) a weird behaviour on combining nc and tar in a
pipeline through lo0 interface that causes very slow speeds when sending
.tar.gz and some .pdf files.
Warning: this issue it's not really important and only happends under
very specific circunstances
You are invited to "i am orphan i need yr help to transfer my father wealth pls
reply me urgent".
By your host Anna Amadou:
Date: Wednesday December 31, 2008
Time: 6:00 am - 7:00 am (GMT +00:00)
Guests:
* miro...@yubc.net
* miros...@antic.org
27 matches
Mail list logo
