Ed Ahlsen-Girard wrote:
Alexander Hall wrote:
Ed Ahlsen-Girard wrote:
OK, I've installed Samba, and gotten printcap set such that I
printed a straight text fire, but nothing else works now that I tried
to print other formats through gv and open-office.
Perhaps Samba is not the way to go?
Dieter wrote:
2. don't use bash as shell for root.
Or at least understand what you are doing.
What is wrong with bash as shell for root?
(Assuming bash is in /bin and statically linked.)
There's nothing wrong with that if you make it statically linked and put
it in /bin. You
I am running a fairly simple dhclient on my OBSD 4.4 box and it runs
as a firewall.
bge0 = lan
bge1 = wan dhcp to ISP
What I have discovered is that all works well UNTIL the ISP modem is rebooted.
At that point, dhclient seems to sleep and then VANISH.
For example...I am running fine and then r
farhan ahmed wrote:
> Question is how can you make shell statically linked? I thought when you
> install package it should be linked rather than manual compiling and
> installing
I think that is best left as an exercise for the asker.
Here's what it boils down to:
There is nothing wrong with a pr
Martin SchrC6der wrote:
>
> Why do you maintain stable by issuing security patches for it if you
> don't care if anybody installs them (by not telling them about the
> patches through one of the designated channels)? Don't you want
> people installing them?
>
> Is it so hard to write a mail to the
On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 10:23:56AM -0800, new_guy wrote:
> Martin SchrC6der wrote:
> >
> > Why do you maintain stable by issuing security patches for it if you
> > don't care if anybody installs them (by not telling them about the
> > patches through one of the designated channels)? Don't you want
I have an i386 box that used to be running 4.3-stable and was recently
upgraded to 4.4 using a CD and following the instructions. Everything
seemed to be working fine including rum wireless in its primary
location. However, a previously working configuration in an alternate
location now results
> 2) in an earlier message you indicated that there was some kind of
> RAID on this system, I think it is safe to say that it is a BIOS-assisted
> software RAID, which COULD be causing you problems if it is still
> configured in the BIOS. And even if it isn't causing this problem,
> it WILL bite y
On Sun, 2008-11-30 at 15:23 -0500, System Administrator wrote:
> The two configuration files are shown below. The only significant
> difference is in how the alternate location uses a non-zero key index.
>
> working hostname.rum0 (in primary location):
> dhcp nwid "HOME" nwkey "HomeWEPString"
>
I read that softraid now supports RAID0 and RAID1 only.
I'm thinking of adding two more disks to the i386 pc I wrote about in this
thread.
Would a RAID 1+0 or 0+1 supported in this case?
I can think of a procedure like this:
- fdisk and disklabel all 4 disks with a single RAID partition
- create
Another bioctl related question, right out of curiosity.
What happens when one or more disks in a RAID fail?
I mean, I suppose some kind of error messages will be logged and/or sent to
console.
I also imagine bioctl softraid? will show useful messages.
Can anyone point me to some documentation e
> used halt -p to shutdown the machine and walked away. The next morning i
> found that while it appears to have shutdown correctly, the machine did
> not power off but instead showed
>
> syncing disks...done
> uchi2: host controller halted
This bug has been supposedly fixed in OpenBSD -current
2008/11/11 Marc Balmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> * Mathias Reitinger wrote:
>> On 22:46 10 Nov 08, Jason Beaudoin wrote:
>> > oh.. is the stuffed puffy (seen in your photos) available for
>> > purchase? I threw out my stress-tux, but my speaker needs a
>> > replacement toy :P
>>
>> you can order the P
Ed Ahlsen-Girard wrote:
OK, I've installed Samba, and gotten printcap set such that I
printed a straight text fire, but nothing else works now that I tried
to print other formats through gv and open-office.
Perhaps Samba is not the way to go? Printcap below.
#$OpenBSD: printcap,v 1.4
This will work although I have not written all the magic to make it
pretty. I will at some point make this into an actual raid type so that
it is a single create statement instead of several. I do not recommend
using it this way.
On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 01:22:55PM -0800, Manuel Ravasio wrote:
>
Softraid will not print anything. It will mark a disk offline and if
the discipline does not support redundancy it will mark the volume
offline as well. bioctl will tell you what is going on.
On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 01:26:24PM -0800, Manuel Ravasio wrote:
> Another bioctl related question, right
I'm trying to export an mfs filesystem, but it seems not to work.
fstab reads
/dev/wd0b /tmp mfs rw,nosuid,-s=524288 0 0
exports reads
/tmp-maproot=root -alldirs clientname
The client can mount but any I/O results in
# mkdir /tmp/shared
# mount -t nfs 192.168.1.10
> Just because you have a cheap 500G disk doesn't mean you
> need to allocate all or most of it. For one, the bigger the disk,
> the longer it takes to fsck after you trip over the power cord.
Wait for fsck? So OpenBSD doesn't have background fsck? :-(
On 1/12/2008, at 9:24 AM, Chris wrote:
2) in an earlier message you indicated that there was some kind of
RAID on this system, I think it is safe to say that it is a BIOS-
assisted
software RAID, which COULD be causing you problems if it is still
configured in the BIOS. And even if it isn't c
19 matches
Mail list logo
