On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 10:49:48 +0200
Gabriel Linder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I use a desktop system powered by OpenBSD 4.3-stable with GENERIC.MP
> kernel (amd64, up to date as of now). I listen music with mplayer
> while I work, and sometime my system feel very slow. A top show that
>
Hello Giancarlo,
Argh - rtfm - I tried to search on this topic but only in the OpenBSD
FAQ.
Thanks for pointig me to the right direction.
Kind regards,
Stefan
-Original Message-
From: Giancarlo Razzolini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Giancarlo Razzolini
Sent: Tuesday, September
Hi all,
I still read FAQ and some man pages again and again (useful and very readable
info),but I'm still not sure or my english is terrible :-)
If I have 4.3 -release and make Upgrade with install44.iso snapshot (say from
28.8.),do I need all the changes pointed here
http://www.openbsd.or
Hi,
On Tue, 02.09.2008 at 22:20:26 +1000, Sunnz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [Tue Sep 2 22:14:29 2008] [notice] child pid 29398 exit signal
> Segmentation fault (11)
> ... some more clipped
try to have a compiler run. SEGVs are often the sign of bad RAM.
So you may want to swap at least disks an
On Wed, Sep 03, 2008 at 09:42:06AM +0200, Gabriel Linder wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 10:49:48 +0200
> Gabriel Linder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I use a desktop system powered by OpenBSD 4.3-stable with GENERIC.MP
> > kernel (amd64, up to date as of now). I listen music with mplayer
> > while I
jared r r spiegel schrieb:
i cannot get sound output to happen on this thing; i see
indication that others with macbooks (pro and regular) have
had sound since sometime in 4.2-current land.
azalia(4) says 'Known supported devices are Intel 82801FB/GB/HB/IB',
and per my dmesg i have an
2008/9/2 Stuart Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> On 2008-09-02, Markus Hennecke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Stuart Henderson schrieb:
> >> On 2008-09-02, Paul Wright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>> I want to monitor the raid as it will be deployed in a remote
> >>> location. Is there somethin
Tomas Bodzar schrieb:
Hi all,
I still read FAQ and some man pages again and again (useful and very readable
info),but I'm still not sure or my english is terrible :-)
If I have 4.3 -release and make Upgrade with install44.iso snapshot (say from
28.8.),do I need all the changes pointed her
Great,
sysmerge(8) is what I'm looking for.Thanks a lot!
I can see this in some misc@ article,that old tool changed to sysmerge(8),but I
was not using it before so I just run out this message and don't take a look at
this tool.
-Original Message-
From: Dorian BCmailto:[EMAIL PROTE
Hi,
is there any chance the next openbsd release holds an unbroken OpenLDAP?
Thanks in advance.
2008/9/3 Toni Mueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, 02.09.2008 at 22:20:26 +1000, Sunnz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> [Tue Sep 2 22:14:29 2008] [notice] child pid 29398 exit signal
>> Segmentation fault (11)
>> ... some more clipped
>
> try to have a compiler run. SEGVs are often the sign
For those using vi from base and using ESC as filec and cedit, or
whatever, because TAB doesn't seem to work:
set cedit=
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
SDF Public Access UNIX System - http://sdf.lonestar.org
Sunnz wrote:
2008/9/3 Toni Mueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi,
On Tue, 02.09.2008 at 22:20:26 +1000, Sunnz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[Tue Sep 2 22:14:29 2008] [notice] child pid 29398 exit signal
Segmentation fault (11)
... some more clipped
try to have a compiler run. SEGVs are often the sign
Ahh I see, so how does memtest to compare to something like building
the userland?
>From above post it seem like should there be any problem then building
the userland may crash the machine... so I'd get some backup plan
going just in case something does break.
So there was a SEGV in the child th
On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 2:11 PM, Sunnz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/9/3 Toni Mueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Ohh it is that bad? I did swap the offending disk but not the RAM...
>
> So what do you mean by "have a compiler run"? To compile something? What's
> SEGV?
>
>
SIGSEGV (SEGV) means s
Sunnz wrote:
Ahh I see, so how does memtest to compare to something like building
the userland?
memtest is targeted specifically at extensively testing your machine's
memory, where building the userland will place load on not only the
memory, but also the hard drive, testing both. The fact th
* John Nietzsche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-09-03 13:22]:
> is there any chance the next openbsd release holds an unbroken OpenLDAP?
I'd say the chance of ever having an unbroken OpenLDAP release on any
OS is pretty damn low.
that said, openldap works as well on openbsd as it does on other oses.
t
On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 7:15 AM, John Nietzsche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> is there any chance the next openbsd release holds an unbroken OpenLDAP?
>
> Thanks in advance.
And how is it broken exactly? I was able to install it just a month
ago and I didn't see anything obviously wrong.
-N
Stefan Sczekalla escreveu:
> Hello Giancarlo,
>
> Argh - rtfm - I tried to search on this topic but only in the OpenBSD
> FAQ.
> Thanks for pointig me to the right direction.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Stefan
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Giancarlo Razzolini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
On Wednesday 03 September 2008 09:04:01 am Dave Wilson wrote:
> If you
> find that the build test fails, and then find that memtest succeeds,
> then you can deduce that the problem lies with your hard drive
Only if memtest is infallible. I may be mistaken but I've long held the
opinion that while
I am in need for performance. Is replacing bdb with ldbm a good ideia?
Thanks once more.
On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 10:28 AM, Henning Brauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * John Nietzsche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-09-03 13:22]:
>> is there any chance the next openbsd release holds an unbroken OpenLDAP
On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 9:28 AM, Nick Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 7:15 AM, John Nietzsche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > is there any chance the next openbsd release holds an unbroken OpenLDAP?
>
Since openbsd doesn't include ldap, I would guess that
On 9/3/08, Chris Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wednesday 03 September 2008 09:04:01 am Dave Wilson wrote:
> > If you
> > find that the build test fails, and then find that memtest succeeds,
> > then you can deduce that the problem lies with your hard drive
>
>
> Only if memtest is infall
On 9/3/08, John Nietzsche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am in need for performance. Is replacing bdb with ldbm a good ideia?
Is working faster than not working?
Hi
Do you know if the raid logic has being corrected in this new release. By
corrected, I means following answer:
http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m=120855938821758&w=2
"This is currently broken (deliberately) as changes are made to the
logic concerning mounting the root disk. There are some mor
Hi all,
1. recent i386 snapshot, bsd.mp on Thinkpad X300
2. gnome desktop
3. opera + flash plugin
Problem:
No sound when playing back flash movies (youtube) via opera
flashplugin. Under generic bsd no sound at all.
Workaround:
Pressing Ctrl+End allows sound to play.
If anyone knows what knobs I
On Wed, 3 Sep 2008 10:37:28 +0200
Ariane van der Steldt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think the interrupt load with a -current or -snapshot will be
> better. I can confirm your high interrupt load (my opteron has an
> interrupt load hovering between 70% and 80% in GENERIC.MP).
Thanks for your fe
On Wed, 3 Sep 2008 16:55:27 +0200, Christophe Rioux wrote
> Hi
>
> Do you know if the raid logic has being corrected in this new
> release...
Yes. See:
http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/sys/dev/raidframe/rf_openbsdkintf.c
On 9/3/08, Christophe Rioux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Do you know if the raid logic has being corrected in this new release. By
> corrected, I means following answer:
>
> http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m=120855938821758&w=2
>
> "This is currently broken (deliberately) as changes are made t
John Nietzsche schrieb:
I am in need for performance. Is replacing bdb with ldbm a good ideia?
Thanks once more.
On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 10:28 AM, Henning Brauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
* John Nietzsche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-09-03 13:22]:
is there any chance the next openbsd rel
I have a development web server set up for httpd, mysql5 and php5 that
has all of a sudden started randomly pausing. After some testing
(removing PHP modules, httpd conf settings, etc) it seems that simply
loading PHP is what is causing the issue. If I remove it from httpd
then serving static HTML
Just to be clear - this is/should be fixed in 4.4.
Ken
- Original Message
From: Ted Unangst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: misc@openbsd.org
Sent: Wednesday, September 3, 2008 11:31:15 AM
Subject: Re: Pre-Order 4.4
On 9/3/08, Christophe Rioux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wro
On 3 September 2008, Ted Unangst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 9/3/08, Chris Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wednesday 03 September 2008 09:04:01 am Dave Wilson wrote:
> > > If you find that the build test fails, and then find that memtest
> > > succeeds, then you can deduce that the pr
On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 4:15 AM, John Nietzsche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> is there any chance the next openbsd release holds an unbroken OpenLDAP?
I presume you're referring to the port/packages version. The answer
depends on whose definition of "unbroken" you prefer.
The last word I heard fro
Dear List,
i'd like to use spamd to create a gerylisting layer, but i have a few smtp
clients on the internet with dynamic IPs. Is there a better way to let them
through besides 2 sending attempts or authpf?
Thanks!
2008/9/3 Ted Unangst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I had a computer with bad ECC that would pass memtest.
Was that with an 24h+ burn-in test?
Personally, I've so far never encountered faulty RAM that a 24h
memtest burn-in test didn't pick up. I have however seen faulty RAM
that memtest said was fine for
On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 1:05 PM, Ben Calvert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[SNIP]
> Don't waste everyone's time with a hopelessly incomplete question. No one
> other than you has the information needed to resolve your problem, it is
> better to provide more information than needed than one detail too l
Gabri Mati wrote:
Dear List,
i'd like to use spamd to create a gerylisting layer, but i have a few smtp
clients on the internet with dynamic IPs. Is there a better way to let them
through besides 2 sending attempts or authpf?
Tell them to use MSA instead of SMTP? Many ISPs block port 25 anyway
"GC!bri MC!tC)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> i'd like to use spamd to create a gerylisting layer, but i have a few smtp
> clients on the internet with dynamic IPs. Is there a better way to let them
> through besides 2 sending attempts or authpf?
With a 'random enough' IP address selection whitel
Steve Shockley schrieb:
Gabri Mati wrote:
Dear List,
i'd like to use spamd to create a gerylisting layer, but i have a few
smtp
clients on the internet with dynamic IPs. Is there a better way to let
them
through besides 2 sending attempts or authpf?
Tell them to use MSA instead of SMTP? Ma
On 9/3/08, ropers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/9/3 Ted Unangst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > I had a computer with bad ECC that would pass memtest.
>
>
> Was that with an 24h+ burn-in test?
>
> Personally, I've so far never encountered faulty RAM that a 24h
> memtest burn-in test didn't pick up
I can confirm this on -current with both intel and radeon with and
without drm enabled.
--
Everything is simple, we're stupid.
gopher://sdf.lonestar.org/1/users/bulibuta
Hi all,
will be there some info about DRI in FAQ,current.html or plus.html ?
I can't find useful tips on Google,OpenBSD,Undeadly and so on :-/
Just old informations and even in man pages xorg.conf,ati,radeon,... is
nothing about it.
Thx
On Wed, 03.09.2008 at 15:43:05 -0400, Ted Unangst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No, I don't have the patience to run a test that long when I already
> know what the problem is. :) It's been a while, but I probably didn't
> leave it running for more than 30 minutes.
It does say "run at least 24 hou
I can confirm this with Nvidia Quadro also.
On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 15:16, Paul Irofti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I can confirm this on -current with both intel and radeon with and
> without drm enabled.
>
> --
> Everything is simple, we're stupid.
> gopher://sdf.lonestar.org/1/users/bulibuta
Hi,
although being unable to implement this, I think that it would be "nice
to have". But I don't agree with all ideas you presented.
On Wed, 05.09.2007 at 00:01:09 -0600, Anthony Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've been tuning some networks for VoIP recently, and to get
> really good resul
On 9/3/08, Paul Irofti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I can confirm this on -current with both intel and radeon with and
> without drm enabled.
And I can confirm the power is on. What are you talking about?
Quoting Chris Tankersley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I have a development web server set up for httpd, mysql5 and php5 that
> has all of a sudden started randomly pausing. After some testing
> (removing PHP modules, httpd conf settings, etc) it seems that simply
> loading PHP is what is causing the iss
At 03:11 PM 9/3/2008 -0700, Aaron Glenn wrote:
On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 3:50 PM, L. V. Lammert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Has anyone seen something like the 2.1 proxy_balancer we could use with
1.3?
>
>Lee
skimming the proxy_balancer description, I would have to say relayd
should fit t
On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 3:50 PM, L. V. Lammert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Has anyone seen something like the 2.1 proxy_balancer we could use with 1.3?
>
>Lee
skimming the proxy_balancer description, I would have to say relayd
should fit the bill...?
You need to modify just one line on:
/usr/src/sys/altq/altq_cbq.h
Around line 104
#define CBQ_MAX_CLASSES 512
And/Or
/usr/src/sys/altq/altq_hfsc.h
Aound line 53
#define HFSC_MAX_CLASSES256
and compile the kernel with the directions:
http://cvs.openbsd.org/faq/faq5.html#
We're in the process of moving our small farm of servers from a managed
provider to unmanaged-provider ServerBeach.com. The difference in price
between the two in terms of monthly costs was huge! My biggest concern
was whether I would be able to remotely build an OpenBSD load-balancing
firewall
On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 6:08 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Quoting Chris Tankersley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>> I have a development web server set up for httpd, mysql5 and php5 that
>> has all of a sudden started randomly pausing. After some testing
>> (removing PHP modules, httpd conf settings,
On 2008-09-03, Toni Mueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 05.09.2007 at 00:01:09 -0600, Anthony Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] :-)
>> I've been tuning some networks for VoIP recently, and to get
>> really good results I've found it's been necessary to do altq
>> in
On 2008-09-03, Chris Tankersley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, even going down to something as little as World'; ?> has a 5-10 second response time.
as a starting point, I'd run that as a CLI script under ktrace
and see if kdump output gives clues.
Quoting Chris Tankersley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
[cut]
> >> I have a development web server set up for httpd, mysql5 and php5
> that
> >> has all of a sudden started randomly pausing. After some testing
> >> (removing PHP modules, httpd conf settings, etc) it seems that
> simply
> >> loading PHP is w
Starting on line 2198 I start getting these kinds of output:
23747 php CALL fcntl(0x5,0x3,0)
23747 php RET fcntl -1 errno 9 Bad file descriptor
23747 php CALL fcntl(0x6,0x3,0)
23747 php RET fcntl -1 errno 9 Bad file descriptor
23747 php CALL fcntl(0x7,0x3,0)
an
On 2008/09/03 19:35, Chris Tankersley wrote:
> Starting on line 2198 I start getting these kinds of output:
> 23747 php CALL fcntl(0x5,0x3,0)
> 23747 php RET fcntl -1 errno 9 Bad file descriptor
> 23747 php CALL fcntl(0x6,0x3,0)
> 23747 php RET fcntl -1 errno 9 Bad fil
So, by now everyone should have heard about the new browser. I just test
drove it a little, and it works great on the sites I go to normally.
So, why am I disappointed?
For a group of people, who took the time to draw a bunch of cartoons to
explain that they view security as something very very
On Wed, Sep 03, 2008 at 10:32:42AM +0200, Tim Saueressig, thepixelz.com wrote:
> jared r r spiegel schrieb:
>> i cannot get sound output to happen on this thing; i see
>> indication that others with macbooks (pro and regular) have
>> had sound since sometime in 4.2-current land.
>>
>> azali
Both the T7250 and T5670 appear on Wikipedia's list (take with grains of salt).
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Intel_Core_2_Duo_microprocessors#.22Merom-2M.22_.28standard-voltage.2C_65_nm.29
Trying to configure relayd to proxy for three local mongrel instances, ..
something like:
table { 127.0.0.1:8000, 127.0.0.1:8001, 127.0.0.1:8002 }
However, both the examples I have found:
forward to port $web_port
and the docs:
forward to port 8080
seem to indicate that relay must use th
I heard some of these processors can selectively turn off one core and
increase the speed of the other core, above the rated speed of the
processor. Could that be what is going on here? I forget what CPUs
have this feature and I can't find a reference right now.
Chris Tankersley wrote:
Starting on line 2198 I start getting these kinds of output:
23747 php CALL fcntl(0x5,0x3,0)
23747 php RET fcntl -1 errno 9 Bad file descriptor
23747 php CALL fcntl(0x6,0x3,0)
23747 php RET fcntl -1 errno 9 Bad file descriptor
23747 php
So I just set up a nice spamd for a client, and then watched Google's Postini
try to resend a single email message from just about every IP they own.
There are some whitelists for commercial servers available, mainly one at
http://projects.puremagic.com/greylisting/, but from what I can see the
I've searched the FAQ and the Web for any guidance on what the minimum RAM
is for OpenBSD, with and without X.
I just acquired a Compaq Armada 1125 laptop that maxes out at 24 MB of
RAM, and I'm wondering whether or not it's feasible to run OpenBSD on it.
Jeff Simmons writes:
> all out of date, and the link to the cvs list is broken. Anyone know of any
> uptodate compilations?
$ host -ttxt google.com
google.com descriptive text "v=spf1 include:_netblocks.google.com ~all"
$ host -ttxt _netblocks.google.com
_netblocks.google.com descriptive text "
Jeff Simmons wrote:
So I just set up a nice spamd for a client, and then watched Google's Postini
try to resend a single email message from just about every IP they own.
For google, why not get it from the source itself?
Example:
# dig txt _spf.google.com | grep spf
; <<>> DiG 9.3.4 <<>> txt
On Wed, Sep 03, 2008 at 08:26:25PM -0700, Jeff Simmons wrote:
> So I just set up a nice spamd for a client, and then watched Google's Postini
> try to resend a single email message from just about every IP they own.
>
> There are some whitelists for commercial servers available, mainly one at
>
Jeff Simmons wrote:
So I just set up a nice spamd for a client, and then watched Google's Postini
try to resend a single email message from just about every IP they own.
And for postini, get it there too:
# dig txt spf.postini.com | grep spf
; <<>> DiG 9.3.4 <<>> txt spf.postini.com
;spf.posti
On Wed, 3 Sep 2008 20:26:25 -0700, Jeff Simmons wrote:
>So I just set up a nice spamd for a client, and then watched Google's Postini
>try to resend a single email message from just about every IP they own.
>
>There are some whitelists for commercial servers available, mainly one at
>http://pro
Jeff Simmons wrote:
So I just set up a nice spamd for a client, and then watched Google's
Postini try to resend a single email message from just about every IP
they own.
Here is a little script that would help you to create your own lists. I
use it and run it in cronjob once a month. Then it
On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 11:00 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've searched the FAQ and the Web for any guidance on what the minimum RAM
> is for OpenBSD, with and without X.
It's the smallest amount of RAM that lets you get your work done.
Yeah, that covers Google, all right. And then somebody called
Websitewelcome.com gives me major grief. Is the only way to do this to wait
for someone to complain that mail isn't going through?
I know how to query for netblocks and such. What I don't know is how many
fraking commercial mail serv
Super,but why isn't this important info on some known place?
If I use Google,than there is nothing on first 5 pages,similiar for OpenBSD
webpage or Undeadly.
I thought,that this is big change in OpenBSD dev and can be pointed
somewhere,maybe in FAQ 11
Ofcourse,that this is easy for most of you,but
Daniel Ouellet wrote:
Jeff Simmons wrote:
So I just set up a nice spamd for a client, and then watched Google's
Postini try to resend a single email message from just about every IP
they own.
For google, why not get it from the source itself?
Example:
# dig txt _spf.google.com | grep spf
;
On Wed, Sep 03, 2008 at 09:12:54PM -0401, jared r r spiegel wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 03, 2008 at 10:32:42AM +0200, Tim Saueressig, thepixelz.com wrote:
> > jared r r spiegel schrieb:
> >> i cannot get sound output to happen on this thing; i see
> >> indication that others with macbooks (pro and reg
It's running fine in console or X (just a longer start).Ofcourse,that you can't
use Firefox or similiar SW :-)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2008 5:00 AM
To: misc@openbsd.org
Subject:
Eh?
What about New browser are you talking? ;-)
I don't know,that lynx(1) which is in base (! ;-)) has option about:plugins .
All others are not in base,just option and every user of OpenBSD know,that
he/she must be careful about installing SW,which is not in base.
http://www.openbsd.o
79 matches
Mail list logo
