Hello
i'm trying to use openbsd (4.2-stable) with a lacrosse weather station
(ws8610).
there are multiple software to handle them depending on models
open (open2300, open3600, open8610, ...)
Sadly, if i can compile software, running them doesn't output anything.
a ktrace shows it stalls (or
On Thursday 17 January 2008, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
> However, there have been threads here detailing the recompilation
> necessary for sendmail to handle SSL Auth (or whatever its called).
> If you have to recompile sendmail (as opposed to changing a config),
> presumably you'd have to make the
On Friday 18 January 2008, Joel Wiramu Pauling wrote:
> > in the end a scrubbing proxy would be a good idea if your uber
> > paranoid.
> >
> > does your bank not use SSL? or do you have some scrubbing proxy
> > that you trust enough to MITM connections to your bank?
>
> No but having a scrubbing pr
Snaps will be a while since Theo is out hiking.
On Sat, Jan 19, 2008 at 07:27:24AM +0100, Rolf Sommerhalder wrote:
> On Jan 19, 2008 5:04 AM, Jonathan Gray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Try this diff:
>
> Great, that fixed it, thank you.
>
> Now, will you commit it so that it will be included i
hail,
I've read araound for some time and never saw how to make a wpa access
point using atheros and OpenBSD.
As far as I could go, the hostap included in OBSD is for intra-ap
stuff (I dont know much about this).
All I've found on this is:
http://www.openbsd.org/plus40.html:
Implement the Michae
Hello,
my dmesg is filled with this message
cksum: out of data
and i can't find out from where it is (has something to do with
the internet connection going up and down).
It's a Alix 2c3 Board running as a DSL-Router
and what I suspect might be the issue is serving
a sixxs.net IPv6 tunnel (via
On Friday 18 January 2008, Dirk Mast wrote:
> Diana Eichert wrote:
> > On Fri, 18 Jan 2008, John Nietzsche wrote:
> >> Dear gentleman,
> >
> > Good thing you made this initial comment, it kept me from wasting
> > my time explaining how to do this task.
> >
> > diana (who spent last night working on
Hi,
I just bought an ibm thinkpad x50s and i'm tryining with latest
current. i386- current to be precise, since i was unable to boot from
amd64 cd42.iso install. Evrthing seems to work well even wifi, but
last thing that doesn't work at all is suspend mode.
acpi seems to work :
enlil% sudo sysct
I just bought an ibm thinkpad x50s
x60s obviously :)
OpenBSD 4.2-current (GENERIC.MP) #547: Fri Jan 18 15:22:48 MST 2008
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC.MP
cpu0: Intel(R) Core(TM) Duo CPU L2400 @ 1.66GHz ("GenuineIntel" 686-class) 1.67
GHz
cpu0:
FPU,V86,DE,PSE,TSC,MS
2008/1/19, bofh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Jan 18, 2008 4:28 PM, Ted Unangst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On 1/18/08, Sunnz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > From what I understand, if foo isn't the last hard link to the file,
> > > and `rm foo` will NOT delete the file...
> >
> > what does it ma
Christ, the guy obviously had difficulty with the English
language. He probably learned that greeting from a textbook.
Learn to pick your battles.
Just wondering has anyone ever used 2 PPPoE(4) connections on one real
interface and rather if it should work or not?
I only have one account with my ISP but they gave me 2 logins and up 4
concurrent logins are allowed with their TOS.
My hardware ethernet gem(4) is connected to a modem, with the
Sunnz P=P0P?P8QP0:
Just wondering has anyone ever used 2 PPPoE(4) connections on one real
interface and rather if it should work or not?
I only have one account with my ISP but they gave me 2 logins and up 4
concurrent logins are allowed with their TOS.
My hardware ethernet gem(4) is connected
Running 4.2-stable (Jan 13).
sysctl:
kern.watchdog.auto
kern.watchdog.period
These sysctl's are no longer available? I didn't notice if it's just in this
build or something changed in 4.1 or 4.2, but I know 4.0 has it and the man
page now even references these sysctl's.
Is it just me or am I mis
On Sat, 19 Jan 2008, Jona Joachim wrote:
> On Sat, 19 Jan 2008 08:47:56 +1300, Joel Wiramu Pauling wrote:
>
> Talking about brainfucked bank sites...
> My bank checks for the browser's user-agent: Firefox on win32 an Linux
> passes, Firefox on *BSD is denied access, unless you change the
> user-ag
On 1/18/08, bofh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think he means sshd. And it really doesn't matter, once you make install,
> you'll overwrite the vulnerable copy with the new one, and all the hardlinks
> won't matter, because they'd be linked to the new file.
except that they won't. the point of
On 19/01/2008, Richard Daemon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Running 4.2-stable (Jan 13).
>
> sysctl:
> kern.watchdog.auto
> kern.watchdog.period
>
> These sysctl's are no longer available? I didn't notice if it's just in this
> build or something changed in 4.1 or 4.2, but I know 4.0 has it and the
On Sat, Jan 19, 2008 at 08:24:27AM +0100, ropers wrote:
> On 19/01/2008, Douglas A. Tutty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> may just be very insecure. Which is it? You can't tell without looking
> at the details, or asking somebody who has done so. Your specific
> questions to this list about Dillo et
> maybe
>
> > and *BSD vlan(1) wont transmit VLAN 1 as tagged (per spec)
Correct -- Thank you. I misspoke.
It _will_ transmit it tagged as VLAN1 (if vlan1 interface is defined),
but whether the receiving VLAN1 interface on the PowerConnect can ever
receive is anyone's guess.
I suppose it de
On Sat, Jan 19, 2008 at 10:27:25AM -0800, Ted Unangst wrote:
> On 1/18/08, bofh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I think he means sshd. And it really doesn't matter, once you make install,
> > you'll overwrite the vulnerable copy with the new one, and all the hardlinks
> > won't matter, because the
On Sat, Jan 19, 2008 at 08:57:10PM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
| On Sat, Jan 19, 2008 at 10:27:25AM -0800, Ted Unangst wrote:
|
| > On 1/18/08, bofh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| > > I think he means sshd. And it really doesn't matter, once you make
install,
| > > you'll overwrite the vulnerable
On Tuesday 15 January 2008 21:06:51 Chris Cohen wrote:
> On Tuesday 15 January 2008 18:13:15 Chris Cappuccio wrote:
> > Chris Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > I think my CPU is way too slow to be able to handle the GigE link and
> > > the filter. Aren't there any tweaks for pf.conf/sysctl?
> >
On Sat, Jan 19, 2008 at 09:06:30PM +0100, Paul de Weerd wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 19, 2008 at 08:57:10PM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> | On Sat, Jan 19, 2008 at 10:27:25AM -0800, Ted Unangst wrote:
> |
> | > On 1/18/08, bofh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> | > > I think he means sshd. And it really does
It'll take a long time before suspend is supported under acpi. Try to
get an apm machine
Pau
2008/1/19, Benoit Chesneau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I just bought an ibm thinkpad x50s
>
> x60s obviously :)
> OpenBSD 4.2-current (GENERIC.MP) #547: Fri Jan 18 15:22:48 MST 2008
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/us
On Jan 19, 2008 10:23 PM, Pau Amaro-Seoane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It'll take a long time before suspend is supported under acpi. Try to
> get an apm machine
ok.
Thanks for the info. Unfortunatly, i don't have the budget to change
the machine every day I want ;) Is there a way to make softw
On Sat, Jan 19, 2008 at 11:09:22PM +0100, Benoit Chesneau wrote:
> On Jan 19, 2008 10:23 PM, Pau Amaro-Seoane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > It'll take a long time before suspend is supported under acpi. Try to
> > get an apm machine
>
> ok.
>
> Thanks for the info. Unfortunatly, i don't have th
Jussi Peltola wrote:
Sadly I am forced to use WPA so I am back to Linux and the buggy ralink
driver on my ThinkPad X22, which does support APM :(
Oh - and to answer your question, not that I know of. Sorry.
FreeBSD supports wireless WPA if you have to use one. Their ral driver
is OK. If
Hey Brian,
I read your post about removing dell switches from your network.
Just curious which models are you referring to?
And what problems have run into using dell switches?
Thanks,
Mike
Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
-Original Message-
From: "Brian A. Seklecki (Mo
On Sun, 2008-01-20 at 00:11 +, Mike wrote:
> Hey Brian,
>
> I read your post about removing dell switches from your network.
>
> Just curious which models are you referring to?
PowerConnect 27xx Managed "Entry-Level". Everything else is a
re-branded Cisco with a crippled ISO version. ~BAS
On Jan 19, 2008 1:27 PM, Ted Unangst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 1/18/08, bofh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I think he means sshd. And it really doesn't matter, once you make
> install,
> > you'll overwrite the vulnerable copy with the new one, and all the
> hardlinks
> > won't matter, beca
On 2008/01/19 19:46, bofh wrote:
> On Jan 19, 2008 1:27 PM, Ted Unangst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On 1/18/08, bofh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I think he means sshd. And it really doesn't matter, once you make
> > install,
> > > you'll overwrite the vulnerable copy with the new one, a
bofh P=P0P?P8QP0:
On Jan 19, 2008 1:27 PM, Ted Unangst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 1/18/08, bofh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think he means sshd. And it really doesn't matter, once you make
install,
you'll overwrite the vulnerable copy with the new one, and all the
bofh wrote:
> I don't get what you're talking about. If you overwrite the file
> (vulnerable sshd) with a new one, the file gets replaced.
> All the hardlinks
> would point to the new file.
Copying to a file can be done in two distinct ways
with different results for any other hard links to sam
Sorry, wrong dmesg. This is the right one:
OpenBSD 4.2-stable (GENERIC) #1: Fri Jan 18 21:26:06 CET 2008
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC
cpu0: AMD Duron(tm) processor ("AuthenticAMD" 686-class, 64KB L2 cache) 754
MHz
cpu0:
FPU,V86,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,
Hi all!
I've just upgraded my firewall from OpenBSD 4.0 to 4.2-stable and ran
into a small problem regarding mount_mfs. I solved it, but in case
anybody else runs into it, here's something for the archives.
I run the box from a 512MB CF and, originally, with very limited
memory. The /var, tmp and
On Jan 19, 2008 8:22 PM, Tony Abernethy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Copying to a file can be done in two distinct ways
> with different results for any other hard links to same file.
> cp overwrites the original inode
> install unlinks the original inode (after?) writing a new inode
>
> You proba
On Jan 19, 2008 8:31 PM, SchC6berle DC!niel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> I've just upgraded my firewall from OpenBSD 4.0 to 4.2-stable and ran
> into a small problem regarding mount_mfs. I solved it, but in case
> anybody else runs into it, here's something for the archives.
>
> I run
On Jan 19, 2008 1:42 PM, Constantine A. Murenin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 19/01/2008, Richard Daemon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Running 4.2-stable (Jan 13).
> >
> > sysctl:
> > kern.watchdog.auto
> > kern.watchdog.period
> >
> > These sysctl's are no longer available? I didn't notice if
2008/1/20, NetOne - Doichin Dokov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> You only have one defautl gateway, so the last pppoe session established
> sets it up to it's interface. The behaviour you're observing is
> absolutely normal. You should dig into pf's route-to, packet tagging and
> state-keeping options if y
On Sun, Jan 20, 2008 at 03:48:16PM +1100, Sunnz wrote:
> pass out on pppoe1 route-to (pppoe0 pppoe0:peer) \
> from any to pppoe0
I don't think that will work. Anyone trying to reach pppoe0 will not get
routed out on pppoe1.
> pass in on pppoe1 route-to (pppoe0 pppoe0:peer) \
> f
On Sun, Jan 20, 2008 at 07:13:02AM +0200, Jussi Peltola wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 20, 2008 at 03:48:16PM +1100, Sunnz wrote:
>
> > pass out on pppoe1 route-to (pppoe0 pppoe0:peer) \
> > from any to pppoe0
> I don't think that will work. Anyone trying to reach pppoe0 will not get
> routed out o
After reading the undeadly post on cwm(1) I am trying it out in
Xnest(1). I was wondering how I could get a background image like the
one shown in undeadly.
Also, I can't invoke mutt using C-/ although I have a symlink in
.calmwm/. GUI apps like firefox and soffice fire up fine.
Any help would be
2008/1/20, Jussi Peltola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Sun, Jan 20, 2008 at 03:48:16PM +1100, Sunnz wrote:
>
> > pass out on pppoe1 route-to (pppoe0 pppoe0:peer) \
> > from any to pppoe0
> I don't think that will work. Anyone trying to reach pppoe0 will not get
> routed out on pppoe1.
>
> > pas
43 matches
Mail list logo
