In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Pedro Martelletto writes:
> On Tue, Sep 05, 2006 at 07:24:55PM +0200, Igor Sobrado wrote:
> > Indeed, it is a BSD disklabel related problem not a ffs's one.
>
> It *is* a FFS problem. The superblocks are different.
The BSD disklabel provides information not only ab
Hi,
has anyone here managed to get X working on a Dell PowerEdge SC 430 yet? I'm
using the onboard graphics (or trying to). I run OpenBSD 3.9 with Xorg ver:
X Window System Version 6.9.0 (for OpenBSD)
Release Date: 21 December 2005
dmesg shows this for the graphics which looks right
vga1 at p
please provide all information.
On Tue, Sep 05, 2006 at 02:50:12PM -0400, John Ruff wrote:
> I'm trying implement a IPSec/VPN tunnel and phase-II of the IKE
> negotiation is failing with the following errors seen from 'isakmpd -
> dKL -D A=90':
>
> 110340.763012 Default pf_key_v2_get_spi: GETS
On 2006/09/05 21:20, Alejandro wrote:
> I read www.openbsd.org/amd64.html and i have doubts with the chipset,
> audio and lan.
audio is probably azalia(4), lan is probably nfe(4) - MCP55
is listed (not MCP55PXE but I bet that just indicates there's a
BIOS module for network-booting). You might nee
On 2006/09/05 22:21, Leonard Jacobs wrote:
> Well I wish it were this easy, or perhaps I am still missing something.
> I added AllowUsers username in the sshd_config file and changed the
> drive to read/write and here's the results:
Was the user added normally (adduser/vipw)?
If not, was pwd_mkd
thus Joseph A. Dacuma spake:
I don't think that binary only drivers are well enough.
Surely better than nothing but ...
No fucking way. No support is FAR FAR better than a blob. Yes, really!
Don't forget that an open source team sometimes makes api changes
that might break a "binary only" dr
On Wed, 06 Sep 2006 09:47:32 +0200
Timo Schoeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: > Hi All!
: >
: > I agree totally with Mr. Peereboom. IMHO, BLOBS are not sustainable
: > in the long run. If a manufacturer decides to retire a particular
: > model (driver support included) while OS keeps on releasing
Hiya,
My work was chucking out an IBM serial console (infowindow II 3153), so I
grabbed it to see if I could get it working with my boxes.
a) Using my Sun Blade 100 the console works fine. As you probably know, most
sun machines set the default console to the serial line (vt100 9600 8N1) if
no ke
On 06/09/06, Tom Cosgrove <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >>> Edd Barrett 6-Sep-06 11:16 >>>
> >
> > Hiya,
> >
> > My work was chucking out an IBM serial console (infowindow II 3153),
> > so I grabbed it to see if I could get it working with my boxes.
> >
> > a) Using my Sun Blade 100 the console wo
Hi all,
I must set up a mail gateway for my office. My boss is tired of spam
and I wonder what I can do. I haven't found similar cases in the
archive.
Our mail server (which runs MS Exchange) receives mails from a master
site "filtering" mails by applying a [SPAM] keyword in the subject.
But it'
On 2006/09/06 13:19, Cedric Brisseau wrote:
> I think spamd can't help a lot since mails aren't received directly.
oh, what do you mean by "aren't received directly"?
On 2006/09/06 13:19, Cedric Brisseau wrote:
> I think spamd can't help a lot since mails aren't received directly.
> Maybe you have similar cases with spamassassin+clamav or relaydb,
> procmail ?
spamassassin and smtp-vilter works quite nicely for this,
you will want to generate an /etc/mail/acces
2006/9/5, mickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Tue, Sep 05, 2006 at 07:39:21PM +0200, Piotrek Kapczuk wrote:
> Hello
>
> When I boot 64 bit kernel on amd64 hardware I got NXE bit recognized.
> When I boot 32 bit kernel on amd64 it doesn't appear.
>
> I wonder if it's normal. If it's simply not supporte
On 9/6/06, Stuart Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 2006/09/06 13:19, Cedric Brisseau wrote:
> I think spamd can't help a lot since mails aren't received directly.
oh, what do you mean by "aren't received directly"?
Mails are redistributed from the master site (unix, smtp) to the
diffe
Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2006/09/06 13:19, Cedric Brisseau wrote:
>> I think spamd can't help a lot since mails aren't received directly.
>
> oh, what do you mean by "aren't received directly"?
>
>
I think he means, the mail are fetched from their provider with a
mechanism similar to fetch
How could I possibly have missed that question...
On Tue, Sep 05, 2006 at 11:13:06AM +0200, Igor Sobrado wrote:
> By the way, when will ffs2 be available in OpenBSD? From the changelogs
> I see that there is some work being done in preparation for ffs2, these
> are excellent news.
Kernel support
On Wed, Sep 06, 2006 at 09:53:43AM +0200, Igor Sobrado wrote:
> but certainly diverging disklabels can explain the problem I outlined
> in the first message to this thread
Uh, yes, maybe. I didn't read it, to be honest. I just looked at the Ted
mail you were pointed at. That's definitely talking a
On 2006/09/06 14:28, Guido Tschakert wrote:
> >> I think spamd can't help a lot since mails aren't received directly.
> > oh, what do you mean by "aren't received directly"?
>
> I think he means, the mail are fetched from their provider with a
> mechanism similar to fetchmail and their provider al
I have a VIA 6421 in a Dell Optiplex PPro machine where the card, BIOS, and
OpenBSD's bootloader detect two identical drives just fine. When I boot in
to OpenBSD, only the first drive is seen.
I've searched the archives and found
http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/openbsd/2006-08/0597.html bu
Cedric Brisseau wrote:
I think spamd can't help a lot since mails aren't received directly.
Maybe you have similar cases with spamassassin+clamav or relaydb,
procmail ?
postfix (with basic smtpd restrictions that can do wonders)
clamav + spamassassin (with bayes enabled) ran from amavisd
You
On 9/6/06, Stuart Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 2006/09/06 14:28, Guido Tschakert wrote:
> >> I think spamd can't help a lot since mails aren't received directly.
> > oh, what do you mean by "aren't received directly"?
>
> I think he means, the mail are fetched from their provider with
Ops! I did not added the "-group" switch to repl(1)!!!
Sorry, this message should be directed to the mailing list too.
--- Forwarded Message
Date:Wed, 06 Sep 2006 16:09:18 +0200
From:Igor Sobrado <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Pedro Martelletto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: sharing
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Pedro Martelletto writes:
> On Wed, Sep 06, 2006 at 09:53:43AM +0200, Igor Sobrado wrote:
> > but certainly diverging disklabels can explain the problem I outlined
> > in the first message to this thread
>
> Uh, yes, maybe. I didn't read it, to be honest. I just loo
On 06/09/06, Tom Cosgrove <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >>> Edd Barrett 6-Sep-06 11:16 >>>
> >
> > Hiya,
> >
> > My work was chucking out an IBM serial console (infowindow II 3153),
> > so I grabbed it to see if I could get it working with my boxes.
> >
> > a) Using my Sun Blade 100 the console wo
At 01:19 PM 9/6/2006 +0200, Cedric Brisseau wrote:
Hi all,
I must set up a mail gateway for my office. My boss is tired of spam
and I wonder what I can do. I haven't found similar cases in the
archive.
Our mail server (which runs MS Exchange) receives mails from a master
site "filtering" mails
Chris 'Xenon' Hanson wrote:
Alternately, for some temporary debugging output, is there a simpler
and more robust way to temporarily jam this junk from inside the driver
out where I can see it?
Anybody have any suggestions or pointers for a n00b who's in over his head?
--
Chris 'Xenon
On Wed, Sep 06, 2006 at 09:42:24AM +0100, Khalid Schofield wrote:
> Hi,
> has anyone here managed to get X working on a Dell PowerEdge SC 430 yet?
> I'm using the onboard graphics (or trying to). I run OpenBSD 3.9 with Xorg
> ver:
>
> X Window System Version 6.9.0 (for OpenBSD)
> Release Date: 2
On Tue, Sep 05, 2006 at 08:02:23PM -0400, Scott Plumlee wrote:
> Mark Zimmerman wrote:
> >On Tue, Sep 05, 2006 at 04:27:42PM -0400, Scott Plumlee wrote:
> >>The FAQ seems to reference UTC (at least in section 8), which would
> >>translate at Universal Time, Coordinated, from what I understand. Ar
On Tue, Sep 05, 2006 at 10:39:31PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
> I`ve some questions related to the upcomming 4.0 Release.
>
> I`ve read that SpeedStep was deactivated for SMP.
> Could somebody explain me why this was done?
>
> I`ve read some AMD announcements and they`l
On Wed, 6 Sep 2006, Edd Barrett wrote:
> > You'll need to send a more detailed email to misc@
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Tom
> >
>
> The /etc/ttys line reads:
>
> tty00 "/usr/libexec/getty std.9600" vt100 on secure
>
> Which according to the faq is fine?
> http://openbsd.org/faq/faq7.html#Se
I've been having trouble since 3.9 trying to get BELL dsl with a
reserved ip to actually work as a second connection on my openbsd
machine. I've upgrade to the Aug 31st snapshot of 4 to try and use the
new ifconfig pppoe commands. I'm getting sporadic and not always
directly reproducible probl
Hi!
Someone could please tell me how can I verify that these security bugs
are fixed or not in openbsd-3.9-stable?
PHP: CVE-2006-4020 [0]
OpenSSL: CVE-2006-4339 [1]
OpenSSL:
I'm updating my source tree regurarly and didn't notice any changes to
openssl's sources.
PHP:
I can verify that the p
"Test, test, test!" I hear the mantra, and I obey.
--
I had this BIND failure just now, as reported in /var/log/daemon and
/var/log/messages, wrapped here for readability:
"...named[24100]: /usr/src/usr.sbin/bind/lib/isc/buffer.c:83:
REQUIREb) != 0L) &&
(((const isc__magic_t *)(b))-
Cedric Brisseau wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I must set up a mail gateway for my office. My boss is tired of spam
> and I wonder what I can do. I haven't found similar cases in the
> archive.
>
> Our mail server (which runs MS Exchange) receives mails from a master
> site "filtering" mails by applying a
Hi, is there anybody using OpenBSD on VAIO laptops?
Mine is PCG-V505BX, and it's soft-keys are not functional, e.g. you need
additional tool to control LCD brightness. Under Linux, such tools is
spicctrl, under FreeBSD - setbrightness from picturebook suite or (modern
way) sysctl dev.acpi_sony.0.br
On 06/09/06, Woodchuck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 6 Sep 2006, Edd Barrett wrote:
>
> > > You'll need to send a more detailed email to misc@
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > >
> > > Tom
> > >
> >
> > The /etc/ttys line reads:
> >
> > tty00 "/usr/libexec/getty std.9600" vt100 on secure
> >
>
On 2006/09/06 15:43, Chris wrote:
> As someone said in this thread - what you want to do is this;
Well, that's a matter of opinion. Personally I quite like Postfix for
some things, but Sendmail configuration is pretty straightforward, it's
in the base OS and generally works pretty well. No need to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
> Last but not least:
> Has Henning something in the backhand?
of course he does. :)
> He owns openhttpd.org for some months now.. :)
Lots of people own lots of domain names that they aren't actively
doing anything with...it just helps keep one's options open should
Someone, who I consider very knowledgeable with BSD, liked dspam. Take a look
at that.
On Wed, 6 Sep 2006 13:19:54 +0200, Cedric Brisseau wrote
> Hi all,
>
> I must set up a mail gateway for my office. My boss is tired of spam
> and I wonder what I can do. I haven't found similar cases in the
>
Hi,
Just ran into this problem on a fresh 3.9 install.
I did a manual install of module MD5-1.7.tar.gz from cpan.org and that seemed
to fix any checksum errors on further perl modules installed
via "perl -MCPAN -e shell"
I had also manually installed Bundle-CPAN-1.852.tar.gz also from cpan.org
p
Greetings,
When attempting to update bind on a 3.9-stable machine I ran into a
slight error installing the man page for nslookup,
# cd /usr/src/usr.sbin/bind
# make
...
# make install
...
for m in dig.1 host.1 nslookup.8; do /usr/bin/install -c -m 644
/usr/src/usr.sbin/bind/bin/dig/$m /usr/man/
hi, hate to bother, ...
I'm running 3.8 on a sun E450 sparc64. I need to be able to enable freebsd
binary
emulation. I checked the /etc/sysctl.conf file to un-remark the line, but
it isn't there;
which makes me think that the sparc64 version of 3.8 doesn't provide
emulation
by default in the
On Wed, 06 Sep 2006 21:46:31 -0600
"David B." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hi, hate to bother, ...
>
> I'm running 3.8 on a sun E450 sparc64. I need to be able to enable freebsd
> binary
> emulation. I checked the /etc/sysctl.conf file to un-remark the line, but
> it isn't there;
> which make
On 9/6/06, Steven Surdock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Greetings,
When attempting to update bind on a 3.9-stable machine I ran into a
slight error installing the man page for nslookup,
# cd /usr/src/usr.sbin/bind
# make
...
# make install
...
for m in dig.1 host.1 nslookup.8; do /usr/bin/install
On Wed, Sep 06, 2006 at 09:46:31PM -0600, David B. wrote:
> hi, hate to bother, ...
>
> I'm running 3.8 on a sun E450 sparc64. I need to be able to enable freebsd
> binary
> emulation.
[snip]
> Am I out of luck? or do I just recompile the kernel?
The option COMPAT_FREEBSD is apparently in
Leonard Jacobs wrote:
Well I wish it were this easy, or perhaps I am still missing
something. I added AllowUsers username in the sshd_config file and
changed the drive to read/write and here's the results:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# mount -o rw /dev/wd0a /
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# ssh -p 222 [EMAIL PROT
46 matches
Mail list logo
