All -
I am having issues with filesystem corruption on a RAID1 array using
RAIDframe on OpenBSD 3.7. If I copy a large (500M+) file onto a
filesystem on the array, the copied file will end up corrupted, other
files on the filesystem may end up corrupted and fsck will show various
errors i
On 9/1/06, Ted Unangst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 8/31/06, viq <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 8/31/06, Otto Moerbeek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Now I don't know if GNU patch has a more smart heuristic for this
> > case, but it could very well be just good luck GNU patch is appplying
> > t
On Fri, 1 Sep 2006, viq wrote:
> On 9/1/06, Ted Unangst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 8/31/06, viq <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On 8/31/06, Otto Moerbeek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Now I don't know if GNU patch has a more smart heuristic for this
> > > > case, but it could very wel
I have a dream.
A dream of unification.
Having one BSD. Merging the three projects and, why not, keeping
incompatible stuff as options that would be either one or another.
But when you tell yourself that it cannot be done, you don't even
try it.
It would require people to not only do it for th
On 01/09/06, Gilbert Fernandes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I have a dream.
>
> A dream of unification.
>
> Having one BSD. Merging the three projects and, why not, keeping
> incompatible stuff as options that would be either one or another.
>
> But when you tell yourself that it cannot be done,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
It would require people to not only do it for the sake of their
projects,
but for the whole BSD people. Even those who really piss you off in
other projects.
Because someday, those projects will live on without us. We'll pass on
like everyone.
Am
On Fri, 1 Sep 2006, Gilbert Fernandes wrote:
> I have a dream.
I have a reality
>
> A dream of unification.
A reality involving separation
>
> Having one BSD. Merging the three projects and, why not, keeping
> incompatible stuff as options that would be either one or another.
Having 3 differe
On Fri, Sep 01, 2006 at 03:41:19AM +0300, Madars wrote:
> On Fri, 01 Sep 2006 01:59:08 +0300, Andrew Dalgleish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> >>[..]
> >>I do trust the packages that are on the CDs, but as
> >>space is limited, you can't put all of them there.
> >>[..]
>
> >Packages on the CD
On Fri, Sep 01, 2006 at 09:50:34AM +0800, Tito Mari Francis Esca?o wrote:
> On 9/1/06, Madars <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >...I do trust the packages that are on the CDs, but as
> >space is limited, you can't put all of them there.
> Does the OpenBSD project consider the use of DVD to distribute t
On Fri, Sep 01, 2006 at 03:11:50PM +0200, Joachim Schipper wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 01, 2006 at 09:50:34AM +0800, Tito Mari Francis Esca?o wrote:
> > On 9/1/06, Madars <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >...I do trust the packages that are on the CDs, but as
> > >space is limited, you can't put all of them
On Fri, Sep 01, 2006 at 02:32:08AM -0500, Robert Jones wrote:
> All -
>
> I am having issues with filesystem corruption on a RAID1 array using
> RAIDframe on OpenBSD 3.7. If I copy a large (500M+) file onto a
> filesystem on the array, the copied file will end up corrupted, other
> files o
On Fri, Sep 01, 2006 at 03:11:50PM +0200, Joachim Schipper wrote:
| On Fri, Sep 01, 2006 at 09:50:34AM +0800, Tito Mari Francis Esca?o wrote:
| > On 9/1/06, Madars <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| > >...I do trust the packages that are on the CDs, but as
| > >space is limited, you can't put all of them
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of
> Joachim Schipper
> Sent: 01 September 2006 03:12 PM
> To: misc@openbsd.org
> Subject: Re: DVD to distribute OpenBSD Packages (Re: about signing
OpenBSD
> packages)
>
> On Fri, Sep 01, 2006 at 09:50:34AM
On Fri, Sep 01, 2006 at 03:54:46PM +0200, Marius Van Deventer - Umzimkulu wrote:
| At least it could be a choice. Pay a little more and get a cd set on DVD
| instead of cd. I'm sure it would be no problem to set up a local ftp
| server for those sparc boxes either.
That's not a good plan - it wou
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of
> Paul de Weerd
> Sent: 01 September 2006 04:12 PM
> To: misc@openbsd.org
> Subject: Re: DVD to distribute OpenBSD Packages (Re: about signing
OpenBSD
> packages)
>
> On Fri, Sep 01, 2006 at 03:54:46PM +0
2006/9/1, Gilbert Fernandes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> I have a dream.
>
> A dream of unification.
>
> Having one BSD. Merging the three projects and, why not, keeping
> incompatible stuff as options that would be either one or another.
Opensource is about choice. If you don't like something, when
On 2006/09/01 15:54, Marius Van Deventer - Umzimkulu wrote:
> At least it could be a choice. Pay a little more and get a cd set on DVD
> instead of cd. I'm sure it would be no problem to set up a local ftp
> server for those sparc boxes either.
Pay a little more? - sounds optional, which just won
Paul de Weerd wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 01, 2006 at 03:54:46PM +0200, Marius Van Deventer - Umzimkulu
> wrote:
> | At least it could be a choice. Pay a little more and get a cd set on DVD
> | instead of cd. I'm sure it would be no problem to set up a local ftp
> | server for those sparc boxes either.
Hi
I have a home network set up with an OpenBSD gateway which is bridged to an
ADSL router, two Windows XP machines and assortment of old boxes I play
around with, and a few IP's available to me. What I want is remote access
back to my windows boxes probably using VNC, and to be able to ssh to my
Hi Joachim,
On 01/09/2006, at 11:11 PM, Joachim Schipper wrote:
Now *that* would suck. Most of my i386 boxes won't read a DVD, and I'm
fairly certain that getting a sparc to read a DVD isn't as easy as
making a i386 do the same.
I have a Lite-On DVD-ROM drive temporarily hanging off a Sun Ult
On 9/1/06, mop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi
I have a home network set up with an OpenBSD gateway which is bridged to an
ADSL router, two Windows XP machines and assortment of old boxes I play
around with, and a few IP's available to me. What I want is remote access
back to my windows boxes prob
On 9/1/06, viq <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 9/1/06, Ted Unangst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 8/31/06, viq <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 8/31/06, Otto Moerbeek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Now I don't know if GNU patch has a more smart heuristic for this
> > > case, but it could very w
On 9/1/06, Ted Unangst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 9/1/06, viq <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 9/1/06, Ted Unangst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 8/31/06, viq <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On 8/31/06, Otto Moerbeek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Now I don't know if GNU patch has a mor
On Fri, 01 Sep 2006 15:47:53 +0300, Joachim Schipper
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If you are sufficiently paranoid, use the ports tree. However, it is
assumed that you are capable enough to use it - no support is given.
I have used ports from -release branch with no problems and it shouldn't
be
On Fri, Sep 01, 2006 at 03:19:02PM +0200, Joachim Schipper wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 01, 2006 at 02:32:08AM -0500, Robert Jones wrote:
> > All -
> >
> > I am having issues with filesystem corruption on a RAID1 array using
> > RAIDframe on OpenBSD 3.7. If I copy a large (500M+) file onto a
> > fi
From: Charles M. Hannum
> On Fri, Sep 01, 2006 at 01:08:13AM +0200, Matthias Kilian wrote:
> > They don't have to write device drivers at all, they just
> should write
> > good documentation.
>
> What we really want is not just documentation, but support
> from their engineers. The Linux commu
On Fri, Sep 01, 2006 at 10:40:01AM -0700, Spruell, Darren-Perot wrote:
> Like, what docs does a vendor engineering division give to the developers
> who write the drivers internally? They don't give them bad docs. They give
> them functional, useful docs. Does it need to be stated that any project
i want to use fping with with nrpe/nagios. as security doc of OpenBSD
state, i want to use systrace privilege elevation but ...
$ sudo /bin/systrace -a -c 556:556 /usr/local/sbin/fping localhost
This program can only be run by root, or it must be setuid root.
$ sudo /bin/systrace -a /usr/local/sbi
On Fri, Sep 01, 2006 at 01:08:13AM +0200, Matthias Kilian wrote:
> They don't have to write device drivers at all, they just should
> write good documentation.
Unfortunately, the "documentation" often isn't so hot either. I'll
give you an example. Even with both code and "documentation" from
Rea
I was happy to continue lurking and not trolling, but it appears some
Open Source users still don't get it, and I figured perhaps by saying
it again might enlighten a few more.
On 31/08/06, Marc G. Fournier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
what my point is, though, is if we aren't willing to
accept 'v
Whyzzi wrote:
On 31/08/06, Marc G. Fournier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
what my point is, though, is if we aren't willing to
accept 'vendor written drivers', then it is *we* that are limiting our
growth but limiting what hardware we can run stably on ...
Sadly, you've twisted the point in the w
On Friday 01 September 2006 11:27, Charles M. Hannum wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 01, 2006 at 01:08:13AM +0200, Matthias Kilian wrote:
> > They don't have to write device drivers at all, they just should
> > write good documentation.
>
> Unfortunately, the "documentation" often isn't so hot either. I'll
On Friday 01 September 2006 19:40, Spruell, Darren-Perot wrote:
> Like, what docs does a vendor engineering division give to the developers
> who write the drivers internally? They don't give them bad docs. They give
> them functional, useful docs. Does it need to be stated that any project
> wanti
From: Charles M. Hannum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Fri, Sep 01, 2006 at 10:40:01AM -0700, Spruell, Darren-Perot wrote:
> > Like, what docs does a vendor engineering division give to the
> > developers who write the drivers internally? They don't
> give them bad
> > docs. They give them func
On 9/1/06, Julien TOUCHE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
i want to use fping with with nrpe/nagios. as security doc of OpenBSD
state, i want to use systrace privilege elevation but ...
$ sudo /bin/systrace -a -c 556:556 /usr/local/sbin/fping localhost
This program can only be run by root, or it must
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > What we really want is not just documentation, but support
> from their
> > engineers. The Linux community is starting to get this in
> some places.
>
> Yes. In many cases, the reason a company doesn't want to
> release documentation is
On Thu, Aug 31, 2006 at 11:40:14PM -0400, Daniel Ouellet wrote:
> on it then on Windows. But it didn't pay as IBM didn't get support
> calls. So, they let it die, without telling anyone obviously. It
> was secure and stable for it's time anyway. Ever tried to by
> direct from IBM
> ...
> secure or
Ted Unangst wrote on 01/09/2006 21:21:
>> seems fping runs a root check which cannot be overcome by a switch (at
>> least in man)
>> even if the policy of fping is with "as root" for everything it can't
>> run ...
>> anything beyond editing the code ?
>
> tried setting the policy to have getuid re
On Fri, Sep 01, 2006 at 12:16:59PM -0700, Spruell, Darren-Perot wrote:
> From: Charles M. Hannum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > On Fri, Sep 01, 2006 at 10:40:01AM -0700, Spruell, Darren-Perot wrote:
> > > Like, what docs does a vendor engineering division give to the
> > > developers who write the
There is no way anybody can "win" from any of this!
That's the worst part of it all!
all BSD's will & are suffering!
The future is always looking back to see what it has to work with!
There is no future with out a past!
The software its self ( BSD's) is smarter them the ones making it.
Thats th
On 08/31/06 01:27, Charles M. Hannum wrote:
The NetBSD Project has stagnated to the point of irrelevance.
Stop whining and spamming to get interest for your broken project and
start doing something interesting, this "future of..." has clearly
nothing to do with that.
"Shut up and code!" ins
On Fri, Sep 01, 2006 at 03:30:26PM +0200, Paul de Weerd wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 01, 2006 at 03:11:50PM +0200, Joachim Schipper wrote:
> | On Fri, Sep 01, 2006 at 09:50:34AM +0800, Tito Mari Francis Esca?o wrote:
> | > On 9/1/06, Madars <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> | > >...I do trust the packages that
On Fri, Sep 01, 2006 at 12:20:04PM -0500, Robert Jones wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 01, 2006 at 03:19:02PM +0200, Joachim Schipper wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 01, 2006 at 02:32:08AM -0500, Robert Jones wrote:
> > > All -
> > >
> > > I am having issues with filesystem corruption on a RAID1 array using
> >
On Fri, Sep 01, 2006 at 09:41:18PM +0800, mop wrote:
> Hi
>
> I have a home network set up with an OpenBSD gateway which is bridged to an
> ADSL router, two Windows XP machines and assortment of old boxes I play
> around with, and a few IP's available to me. What I want is remote access
> back to
hi,
which is better to use if i load balance my 2 ethernet ports, would you
prefer to use carp or trunk?
btw im going to load balance 2 ethernet ports on my openbsd firewall
going to my manage switch which supports 802.1q and port-aggregation or
load sharing between multiple ports.
thanks a lot f
On 9/1/06, Julien TOUCHE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> tried setting the policy to have getuid return an error of 0?
>
>
isn't it limited to a deny (returning an errorcode) ? so how ?
native-getuid: permit
native-getuid: permit[0] => error
native-getuid: permit as root => error
yeah, actually
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
so spake "Rogier Krieger" (rkrieger):
> Is there a way to open up login.conf without divulging the bindpw?
> Reading the login_ldap and login.conf man pages, I did not find any.
>
> So far, I see two possible remedies: [1] patching login_ldap to obtain
> sen
On Fri, 1 Sep 2006 21:41:18 +0800
"mop" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> spake:
> Hi
>
> I have a home network set up with an OpenBSD gateway which is bridged to an
> ADSL router, two Windows XP machines and assortment of old boxes I play
> around with, and a few IP's available to me. What I want is remote acc
> I have a home network set up with an OpenBSD gateway which is bridged to an
> ADSL router, two Windows XP machines and assortment of old boxes I play
> around with, and a few IP's available to me. What I want is remote access
> back to my windows boxes probably using VNC, and to be able to ssh to
I was trying to use mg at home and all of the documentation seems to
indicate that 'C-x 3' should split the window horizontally and 'C-x 2'
should split the window vertically. In reality, 'C-x 2' splits the
screen horizontally and 'C-x 3' does nothing. I haven't changed any
settings and my ~/.mg
Michael Hutt wrote:
> I was trying to use mg at home and all of the documentation seems to
> indicate that 'C-x 3' should split the window horizontally and 'C-x 2'
> should split the window vertically. In reality, 'C-x 2' splits the
> screen horizontally and 'C-x 3' does nothing. I haven't change
51 matches
Mail list logo
