On 1/19/06, Scott Francis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Surprisingly, nobody else has mentioned this on-list yet (perhaps
> because it's been all over the news elsewhere):
> http://news.google.com/news?hl=en&ned=us&q=anonym.os&btnG=Search+News
It was reported on undeadly.org.
> I'm not in the leas
On Thursday 19 January 2006 01:37 am, Michael Bibby wrote:
> hello ,[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> I have a Linux(SUSE ENTERPRISE LINUX 9) system ,and i want to send all
> syslogd messages
> to another system which runs OpenBSD 3.8 release . How can i do with
> OpenBSD ?
>
> well ,i know how to configure it
> I've seen the same on amd64 (OpenBSD 3.7 and 3.8) running net-snmp 5.x.
Yep, that's it ;-)
> I haven't noticed any issue with interface counters,
On our platform, interface counters are sent back using Counter32 while
carrying 64 bits values. It works while the counter is less than 4 GB but
Going to go against the flow here and say go for OpenVPN.
This recommendation is based on the following observations:
It's easy to implement
It's secure
It's stable
By using the tls-auth option the fact that your firewall is acting as a
vpn endpoint becomes invisible to the 'net'
It easily han
On 2006/01/19 09:38, Simon Slaytor wrote:
> When comparing the two vpn solutions for speed, subjectively the OpenVPN
> feels slightly faster
If you're using compression on OpenVPN but not on IPSEC, that would
probably explain the speed difference.
Stuart Henderson wrote:
>On 2006/01/19 09:38, Simon Slaytor wrote:
>
>
>>When comparing the two vpn solutions for speed, subjectively the OpenVPN
>>feels slightly faster
>>
>>
>
>If you're using compression on OpenVPN but not on IPSEC, that would
>probably explain the speed difference.
>
>
On 2006/01/19 10:39, Simon Slaytor wrote:
> Stuart Henderson wrote:
> >On 2006/01/19 09:38, Simon Slaytor wrote:
> >
> >>When comparing the two vpn solutions for speed, subjectively the OpenVPN
> >>feels slightly faster
> >
> >If you're using compression on OpenVPN but not on IPSEC, that would
> >
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
Borghi Toscani | E - mail | Registrati | Inserisci un locale | Meteo |
News
[IMAGE]
NUOVI
INSERIMENTI
Newsletter della 4B0 settimana 2006
LINK
CONSIGLIATI
Lorenzo il Magnifico
LAST MINUTE IN TOSCANA
OFFERTE SOGGIORNI IN TOSCANA
OFFERTE LAST MINUTE FIRENZE
Last Minute Abet
On 1/19/06, john gotti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> hi , i meant where to put RULE with dup-to to not to mess with other ,
> espessially with RULE using route-to , i would test it mysel but this fw is
> quite important , so if anyone using it a i would happy for tips , anyway
> manpage no telling
hi , i meant where to put RULE with dup-to to not to mess with other ,
espessially with RULE using route-to , i would test it mysel but this fw is
quite important , so if anyone using it a i would happy for tips , anyway
manpage no telling how dup-to is interact with rules with route-to ,
fastrout
hi , i meant where to put RULE with dup-to to not to mess with other ,
espessially with RULE using route-to , i would test it mysel but this fw is
quite important , so if anyone using it a i would happy for tips , anyway
manpage no telling how dup-to is interact with rules with route-to ,
fastrout
Hi!
I have a computer based on this motherboard (more info here:
http://www.asrock.com/product/product_775Twins-HDTV.htm), and the
OpenBSD 3.8 install CD won't find the disks.
The southbridge is an ULi 1573, and since it is not present in the
OpenBSD chipset support list, the reason 3.8 won't fin
At 12:59 PM 2/11/05, Henning Brauer wrote:
* Frank Bax <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-02-11 18:53]:
> At 07:59 AM 2/11/05, Henning Brauer wrote:
> >* Frank Bax <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-02-11 04:08]:
> >> ntp engine ready
> >> no reply from 192.117.105.69 received in time
> >> no reply from 82.69.129
On 2006/01/19 14:33, Joakim Roubert wrote:
> I have a computer based on this motherboard (more info here:
> http://www.asrock.com/product/product_775Twins-HDTV.htm), and the
> OpenBSD 3.8 install CD won't find the disks.
>
> The southbridge is an ULi 1573, and since it is not present in the
> Open
On Thu, Jan 19, 2006 at 11:28:31AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2006/01/19 10:39, Simon Slaytor wrote:
> > Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > >On 2006/01/19 09:38, Simon Slaytor wrote:
> > >
> > >>When comparing the two vpn solutions for speed, subjectively the OpenVPN
> > >>feels slightly faster
Florida Vacation Rental The Colony At Sable TraceNorth Port, FL30 Minutes
South of Sarasota FL NEW CONDO 1st floor (1168 SQ/FT Living)
Available Feb 1st. The Colony at Sable Trace is a new condominium gated
community withinSable Trace Golf Course (semi-private course). This 1st
floor unit offers:
On 2006-01-19 15:42, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> No dmesg, so it's difficult to help you... Even if all you can do is
> boot the install kernel, save a dmesg to a file, and ftp it somewhere,
> that's a lot better than nothing.
I will see if I can fix that.
> ULi want an NDA before releasing docume
Greetings,
I'm using a pair of 3.8-stable (1/5/06) servers as the firewall and default
gw (10.10.0.1/16) for a LAN . VPN users (10.4.0.0/16) come into the LAN
from a PIX (10.10.0.254/16) (changing soon to OpenVPN), and when the VPN
users hit a server return packets are sent to the default gw. I
On Thu, Jan 19, 2006 at 10:32:40AM -0500, Steven S wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> I'm using a pair of 3.8-stable (1/5/06) servers as the firewall and default
> gw (10.10.0.1/16) for a LAN . VPN users (10.4.0.0/16) come into the LAN
> from a PIX (10.10.0.254/16) (changing soon to OpenVPN), and when the V
On 2006/01/19 10:32, Steven S wrote:
> I'm using a pair of 3.8-stable (1/5/06) servers as the firewall and default
> gw (10.10.0.1/16) for a LAN . VPN users (10.4.0.0/16) come into the LAN
> from a PIX (10.10.0.254/16) (changing soon to OpenVPN), and when the VPN
> users hit a server return packet
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 19, 2006 at 10:32:40AM -0500, Steven S wrote:
...
>
> What about sysctl net.inet.ip.forwarding? Is it set to 1?
>
>> wq Claudio
Yep. The firewalls are working perfectly aside from this redirect issue.
They are even performing ISP load balancing (when the s
On 2006-01-19 15:42, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> No dmesg, so it's difficult to help you...
Ok, here goes:
(there might be typos, since I write down what I read on the screen next
to me...)
=
OpenBSD 3.8 (RAMDISK_CD) #794: Sat Sep 10 15:58:32 MDT 2005
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dear misc,
Not so long ago Via released a new chipset which sounds very promising
performance-wise, compared to the Nvidia solutions, the K8T900.
I was wondering whether there was already any interest from dev's for
this platform.
The reason is simple: a dual-boot machine which can handle OpenB
On 2006/01/19 17:08, Joakim Roubert wrote:
> On 2006-01-19 15:42, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > No dmesg, so it's difficult to help you...
>
> Ok, here goes:
> (there might be typos, since I write down what I read on the screen next
> to me...)
well done :)
I have some similar ALi/ULi devices on a
On 1/18/06, Hans-Joerg Hoexer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 11:20:55AM +0100, Joachim Schipper wrote:
> Forget about openvpn, there's no need to fiddle around with third
> party stuff.
OT: OpenVPN has its purposes, though this particular scenario
shouldn't be one of them. On
On 2006-01-19 17:43, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>>vendor "Acer Labs", unknown product 0x5287 (class mass storage subclass
>>SATA, rev 0x02) at pci0 dev 31 function 1 not configured
>
> Good, it's not hidden behind an unrecognisable pci-pci bridge.
Ok, at least that's something! :)
> Try looking fo
thanks ,it works .
^_^
You will need to start syslog on the openbsd server with the -u option
> (see /etc/rc.conf and syslogd man pages) and also make sure you have
> pf.conf
> allowing port 514 udp from your linux host.
On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 11:55:15PM -0800, Jacob Meuser wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 19, 2006 at 08:17:15AM +0100, Karl-Ludwig Reinhard wrote:
> > hello list,
> >
> > I'm looking for a openbsd live cd for sys admins, but the only thing
> > I've found was the anonym.os. Is there any other live cd based on
mh I don't want to build a live cd myself. I was looking for a ready-
built one. may you have misunderstood me.
On Jan 19, 2006, at 8:55 AM, Jacob Meuser wrote:
On Thu, Jan 19, 2006 at 08:17:15AM +0100, Karl-Ludwig Reinhard wrote:
hello list,
I'm looking for a openbsd live cd for sys admins,
Isn't "Destination unreachable" icmp a reply to a closed udp port?
-Ober
Richard Chesler: [Reading a piece of paper] The first rule of Fight Club is you
don't talk about Fight Club?
Narrator: [Voice-over] I'm half asleep again; I must've left the original in
the copy machine.
Richard Chesler:
On 2006/01/19 17:54, Joakim Roubert wrote:
> On 2006-01-19 17:43, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>
> > Try looking for a BIOS setting called something like legacy/native,
> > and toggle it. By doing that, I got M5289 to function (DMA unsupported,
> > but even with onboard disks it still completes 'make b
On 2006/01/19 11:37, ober wrote:
> Isn't "Destination unreachable" icmp a reply to a closed udp port?
Not if it's coming from the firewall rather than the endpoint -
but 'block return' to a udp port does give 'destination unreachable'
icmp.
Hi,
when using 802.11a devices in Europe it is mandatory that they support
Dynamic Frequency Selection DFS and Transmit Power Control TPC
(802.11h). Is this supported by the OpenBSD ath(4) driver? Or is it
automatically enabled by the hardware?
But how do I set the countrycode for ath wifi cards?
Hi! I have a couple of WRAP.1E boards running OpenBSD 3.8. Using iperf
I can only get about 4 to 5 Mbit/s between them.
Is that figure reasonable for that kind of systems?
Cheers,
Carlos
Sebastian Schucht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> rl0: flags=8843 mtu 1500
> address: 00:40:f4:63:63:3d
> media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX full-duplex)
> status: active
> inet XXX.100.40.69 netmask 0xff00 broadcast 141.100.40.255
> inet XXX.100.40.70 ne
I have been playing around with openbsd portmap. I am confused about
the fact that if a program is registered above port 1024 any local
user may remove it, right?
Does it sound good from a security point of view?
PS: Sorry if i seem stupid, but it is really strange for me.
> I have been playing around with openbsd portmap. I am confused about
> the fact that if a program is registered above port 1024 any local
> user may remove it, right?
Yes.
> Does it sound good from a security point of view?
It's not that great, but unfortunately there is no solution to this
pr
Are the OpenBSD Release songs also BSD licenced? The lyrics page
doesn't specify.
I wanted to know if they are "podcast safe".
Stuart Henderson wrote:
...
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] pfctl -s rules |grep 10.4
>> pass in quick on fxp2 inet from 10.10.0.0/16 to 10.4.0.0/16
>> pass out quick on fxp2 inet from 10.4.0.0/16 to 10.10.0.0/16
>
> I suspect you will need to allow the packets through in order to get
> the redirects sent. A
On Thu, 19 Jan 2006 11:28:31 +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>On 2006/01/19 10:39, Simon Slaytor wrote:
>> Stuart Henderson wrote:
>> >On 2006/01/19 09:38, Simon Slaytor wrote:
>> >
>> >>When comparing the two vpn solutions for speed, subjectively the OpenVPN
>> >>feels slightly faster
>> >
>> >If
Hi,
can you give me some advice how to install OpenBSD
on a Sun Cobalt Qube 3, please?
The Cube comes without cdrom or fd and no display
I read about the PXE installation
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq6.html#PXE
What kind of installation method do you recommend?
Regards
Wolfgang
The Cube
Hello,
Apologies if this is slightly OT, but I've been over this with the SA list
and they tell me spamassassin is working correctly. Also since smtp-vilter
is one of two milters in packages, I thought there must be people on this
list with experience with it (And I know the author posts here)
I
I have a problem that when a Windows client tries to connect to this ftp
site, windows explorer returns 'The operation timed out'.
The setup is, windows box behind a openbsd PF (NAT enabled) through the
public internet to another openbsd PF (NAT enabled) which has a rdr rule
to redirect to anoth
On Thu, Jan 19, 2006 at 11:03:33PM +0100, Wolfgang Kess wrote:
> Hi,
>
> can you give me some advice how to install OpenBSD
> on a Sun Cobalt Qube 3, please?
>
> The Cube comes without cdrom or fd and no display
>
> I read about the PXE installation
> http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq6.html#PXE
at the smallest packet sizes, that sounds about right, if not slightly
low
Carlos Valiente [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi! I have a couple of WRAP.1E boards running OpenBSD 3.8. Using iperf
> I can only get about 4 to 5 Mbit/s between them.
>
> Is that figure reasonable for that kind of systems?
>
Greetings,
I'm not sure about this specific model but...
the Cobalt stuff, in most cases, has a very unusual boot loader (a Linux
kernel that can only boot only certain type binaries IIRC) that would
make it impossible to boot a BSD kernel.
I do recall seeing where someone was able to boot F
Wolfgang Kess wrote:
Hi,
can you give me some advice how to install OpenBSD
on a Sun Cobalt Qube 3, please?
The Cube comes without cdrom or fd and no display
I read about the PXE installation
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq6.html#PXE
What kind of installation method do you recommend?
R
Greetings,
This is my first post. Apologies if not everything is pro forma.
I hope someone might help me with this issue.
Ssh session and pinging 3.8 Generic running on Compaq Deskpro SB time out
after 800 to 2400 when not actively using the box.
You get 'No route to Host' message in ping or ssh
I wrote:
> A GENERIC amd64 kernel compiled from today's sources is causing my
> Asus k8v-se-d to run fast by approximately 3 seconds per minute.
> (Obviously that was with ntpd not running.) This has never been a
> problem before. Is anyone else seeing this?
Turns out this was caused by the most
Steven S wrote:
> I'm using a pair of 3.8-stable (1/5/06) servers as the firewall and
> default gw (10.10.0.1/16) for a LAN . VPN users (10.4.0.0/16) come
> into the LAN from a PIX (10.10.0.254/16) (changing soon to OpenVPN),
> and when the VPN users hit a server return packets are sent to the
> d
On 1/19/06, Wolfgang S. Rupprecht
> Turns out this was caused by the most recent changes to kern_clock.c
> and kern_time.c. Compiling with these previous versions gave me a
> functional system clock again.
grr
hello,
i was setting up my wrap.1e board when the following happened. this is
not the first actual installation of 3.8 on this very hardware, but i
never got around to actually start configuring the box (i was playing
with the etherboot upgrade mentioned earlier).
everything is via wrap's seri
To even begin to get help on this, you'd need to submit the pf rules on
those obsd boxen.
On Thu, Jan 19, 2006 at 05:36:02PM -0500, Price, Joe wrote:
> I have a problem that when a Windows client tries to connect to this ftp
> site, windows explorer returns 'The operation timed out'.
>
>
>
>
On 1/19/06, Tamas TEVESZ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> barghest:/etc/ppp# chmod 06panic: ffs_read: type 0
can you perform some mem / hw testing? this smells like disk corruption.
> as a strange addition, it seems that the board can pretty
> reliably be panicked with the following:
>
>
> barghest:
...
> I know this is not the answer to your question and I'd like
> to hear how
> you wind up getting the OpenBSD box to send the redirects you are
> looking for, but relying on redirects to do your routing for anything
> length of time is asking for trouble IMHO. You might just be better
> off, t
I have some rexx scripts that I would like to run on OpenBSD.
Does anyone have any experience with running rexx on openbsd? I have
tried brexx, regina, and oorexx so far.
Regina and oorexx fail to compile, and brexx doesn't seem to be feature
complete (it doesn't seem to be able to propagate var
Hello,
I've a server at the German hoster Strato and I try to install OpenBSD
3.8 on this machine. But I always get a device timeout of the Intel Nic
(because of a wrong irq assignment?) :(
Here is the dmesg output:
OpenBSD 3.8 (RAMDISK) #9: Tue Jan 17 18:24:51 CET 2006
[EMAIL PROTECTE
57 matches
Mail list logo
