On Fri, 30 Dec 2005 23:23:43 -0800, Jacob Meuser wrote:
> but did it not mount the disc?
njet. zero.
> that's from sys/isofs/udf/udf_vfsops.c, and actually it's udf_mount:...
>
> that's not a message from a fatal error, it's just "informative".
I *did* understand this. It was added for complet
>>> b h 31-Dec-05 04:05 >>>
:
> then, when I press RETURN and attempt to
>
> # fsck_ffs /dev/rsd0a
> ** /dev/rsd0a
> cannot alloc 36537985 bytes for typemap
> #
>
> while dmesg also says I have:
>
> real mem = 1072472064 (1047336K)
> avail mem = 972025756 (949244K)
This message comes from setup(
Hello,
just FYI: I'm running -current on a dual-CPU HP Kayak-XAs 750 MT
with a ral PCI card and regularly get these 2 messages:
Dec 31 00:32:17 gate /bsd: Data modified on freelist: word 4 of
object 0xd151560
0 size 0x100 previous type devbuf (0xdeadbeee != 0xdeadbeef)
(is that coming
On Fri, Dec 30, 2005 at 08:37:30PM +0800, Uwe Dippel wrote:
> file larger than 2 GB will show with wrong content and a negative size.
This was fixed in 8/11, and made the stable tree on 1/12.
-p.
On Sat, 31 Dec 2005 01:29:16 +0100
Gilles LAMIRAL <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have 2 internet connections.
> Each one is handled by an Openbsd system.
> Each one has an intERnet address.
> Each one is doing NAT for the intRAnet hosts.
> I have a smtp server (not openbsd) inside the intRAnet,
>
I've searched the archives and (re)read the man page of useradd, but I
can't understand why the -p option exists. To me, I can see no way of
using it safely (securely) as it can display on the process listing.
Admittedly, there might be some use for it that I haven't thought of -
but in it's curre
On Sat, Dec 31, 2005 at 01:51:53PM +, Adam Gleave wrote:
> I've searched the archives and (re)read the man page of useradd, but I
> can't understand why the -p option exists. To me, I can see no way of
> using it safely (securely) as it can display on the process listing.
>
> Admittedly, there
--- Tom Cosgrove <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> >>> b h 31-Dec-05 04:05 >>>
> :
> > then, when I press RETURN and attempt to
> >
> > # fsck_ffs /dev/rsd0a
> > ** /dev/rsd0a
> > cannot alloc 36537985 bytes for typemap
> > #
> >
> > while dmesg also says I have:
> >
> > real mem = 1072472064 (104733
On Tue, 27 Dec 2005 13:29:17 +0100, Rolf Sommerhalder
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Good news - my WRAPs now pxeboot OpenBSD as expected! The culprit was
>not pxeboot, but the etherboot PXE code 5.3.12 in BIOS 1.08 and 1.10,
>as supplied by PCengines.
>
Seems you were lucky but if you had to dig i
Adam Gleave wrote:
> I've searched the archives and (re)read the man page of useradd, but I
> can't understand why the -p option exists. To me, I can see no way of
> using it safely (securely) as it can display on the process listing.
>
> Admittedly, there might be some use for it that I haven't t
On Sat, 31 Dec 2005 12:19:38 -0500, Nick Holland
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Virtually every feature has risk associated with it of SOME kind.
^
Congratulations Nick! -In the final hours you have succeeded in having
the best/worst punn of 2005. ;-)
JCR
Hi,
Sorry, but I just can't seem to get (all of)
net.inet.carp.preempt from the man pages.
I could set this up and test it, but I know that
somebody's done it already and a quick search of
the list archives fails me.
Suppose I have 2 firewalls, one failing over to the
other with carp. (net.inet.
man 5 ifstated.conf says:
"The init block is used
to initialise the state and is executed each time the
state is entered."
But this does not seem to be true if you use 'init-state'
to enter the state. Or maybe there's something else
wrong with my config below, or with ifstated when there's
no b
Somebody please correct me if I'm wrong. Blowfish has
been extensively analyzed since 1993. It is believed
to be secure.
As far as the 64 bit blocks go: most solid encryption
programs generally use a block chaining mode, to group
multiple blocks together. Encrypt one block, XOR it
with the next, e
Well I was contemplating the error of my ways on this thread. I realized
that I was wrong. Blowfish's implementation is secure and efficient...
from a programmer's point of view.
A few hundred years ago everybody knew the Earth was the center of the
universe.
Then we knew that the most basic fo
15 matches
Mail list logo
