On Fri, 30 Dec 2005 23:23:43 -0800, Jacob Meuser wrote: > but did it not mount the disc?
njet. zero. > that's from sys/isofs/udf/udf_vfsops.c, and actually it's udf_mount:... > > that's not a message from a fatal error, it's just "informative". I *did* understand this. It was added for completeness of this report. No, my -t udf didn't mount it. The default mounts it properly, except for large files. It looks exactly like in that cited google post; like jumping to negative numbers at an integer overflow. I could live with the wrong size indication, but the content also is screwed. Anything below 2 GB is perfect. Have you tried with a large file ? I have been using it successfully, only yesterday I wanted to burn some 'dump'-images to DVD when the mess showed at my control mounts after burning. And I expected growisofs initially. Uwe
