Rod.. Whitworth wrote:
> Somebody sent me a query asking for a justification for my proposal to
> supply a firewall/router using OpenBSD when there was thsi device:
> http://www.dlink.com/products/?pid=327 , with all its claimed bells
> and whistles.
>
> Anybody know what, if anything, it does tha
On Tue, 02 Aug 2005 22:54:22 -0500, Shawn K. Quinn wrote:
>On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 22:09 -0400, Jim Fron wrote:
>> What it does that an OBSD solution can't is be low power, cheap, and
>> bought off the shelf (maybe there are off-the-shelf suppliers of OBSD
>> machines, but they aren't in every str
On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 01:53:07PM -0700, Greg Thomas wrote:
> Does anyone know if the RICOH R5C485 chipset is YENTA compliant and/or
> will work with OpenBSD/i386? I haven't found a definitive answer
> Googling. I have a Senao 802.11b card I'd like to use in a desktop
> PC.
Yes, works out of th
Hi,
I have 1 argument for D-Link and against OpenBSD:
D-Link can DSL. OpenBSD can not. So you have to
buy at least a DSL modem for OpenBSD. And since you
are buying a DSL modem, why not add 20 Euros and
buy a DSL-router? At least for a small home network.
Regards
Alex
On Wed, Aug 03, 2005 at 07:14:54AM +0200, Alexis de BRUYN wrote:
>
> pppoe0: flags=8851 mtu 1492
>
> dev: ne3 state: session
>
> sid: 0xc368 PADI retries: 0 PADR retries: 0 time: 0:2:38
>
> inet 84.97.3.232 --> 0.0.0.1 netmask 0x
>
> inet6 fe80::204:76f
On Wed, Aug 03, 2005 at 10:30:25AM +0200, Alexander Farber wrote:
| Hi,
|
| I have 1 argument for D-Link and against OpenBSD:
|
| D-Link can DSL. OpenBSD can not. So you have to
| buy at least a DSL modem for OpenBSD. And since you
| are buying a DSL modem, why not add 20 Euros and
| buy a DSL-rout
Melameth, Daniel D. wrote:
Rod.. Whitworth wrote:
Somebody sent me a query asking for a justification for my proposal to
supply a firewall/router using OpenBSD when there was thsi device:
http://www.dlink.com/products/?pid=327 , with all its claimed bells
and whistles.
Anybody know what, if an
On 2005-08-03 03:03, Rod.. Whitworth wrote:
Somebody sent me a query asking for a justification for my proposal to
supply a firewall/router using OpenBSD when there was thsi device:
http://www.dlink.com/products/?pid=327 , with all its claimed bells and
whistles.
Anybody know what, if anything,
On Wed, 03 Aug 2005 11:03:34 +1000, "Rod.. Whitworth"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Somebody sent me a query asking for a justification for my proposal to
>supply a firewall/router using OpenBSD when there was thsi device:
>http://www.dlink.com/products/?pid=327 , with all its claimed bells and
>whi
Hi,
I am curious to know if anyone is running OpenBGPd attached to a
loopback interface with specific "listen" directives for their BGP
sessions. In "cisco land" this is not atypical.
Are folks doing this with OpenBGPd? Would it even work as expected?
From just thinking about it for a
On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 05:02:05PM +0200, umaxx wrote:
> # ifconfig tun0 create
> # ifconfig tun0 10.0.0.1 10.0.0.2 up
try
ifconfig tun0 10.0.0.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 link0
On Wed, 3 Aug 2005 10:30:25 +0200, Alexander Farber wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I have 1 argument for D-Link and against OpenBSD:
>
>D-Link can DSL. OpenBSD can not. So you have to
>buy at least a DSL modem for OpenBSD. And since you
>are buying a DSL modem, why not add 20 Euros and
>buy a DSL-router? At leas
Something's screwy here, using the 'set -A' command in /bin/sh on
3.7-release. AFAICT the complicated file-match expression should (in
this case) produce the same results as the simple one, but it doesn't
seem to match at all when used in this script -- but does produce the
expected result when cu
On Wed, 3 Aug 2005 11:03:23 +0200, Paul de Weerd wrote:
>On Wed, Aug 03, 2005 at 10:30:25AM +0200, Alexander Farber wrote:
>| Hi,
>|
>| I have 1 argument for D-Link and against OpenBSD:
>|
>| D-Link can DSL. OpenBSD can not. So you have to
>| buy at least a DSL modem for OpenBSD. And since you
>|
While building 'cross-tools' on i386 host, OpenBSD 3.7 (with current
patches.)
Environment var: TARGET=m68k
From /usr/src
Command: make cross-tools (TARGET=m68k already defined in ENV )
...
Goes well for m68k build (always) until it gets into the 'libgcc2'
floating point func
Intel SRCU42L works fine.
diego.
- Original Message -
From: "J.D. Bronson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2005 10:05 PM
Subject: SCSI RAID cards for 3.7?
I am wondering if anyone has any recommendations for very well supported
RAID cards (u320) for 3.7 ?
I have
Randy Lewis wrote:
> While building 'cross-tools' on i386 host, OpenBSD 3.7 (with current
> patches.)
> Environment var: TARGET=m68k
> From /usr/src
> Command: make cross-tools (TARGET=m68k already defined in ENV )
> ...
> Goes well for m68k build (always) until it gets into the
On Wed, 3 Aug 2005, Dave Anderson wrote:
> Something's screwy here, using the 'set -A' command in /bin/sh on
> 3.7-release. AFAICT the complicated file-match expression should (in
> this case) produce the same results as the simple one, but it doesn't
> seem to match at all when used in this scri
See sh(1), under "Command execution":
[...] Just to confuse things, if the posix option is turned off (see
the set command below), some special commands are very special in that
no field splitting, file globbing, nor tilde expansion is performed on
arguments that look like assignments.
Andreas
> -Original Message-
> From: Lars Hansson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 03, 2005 12:20 AM
> To: misc@openbsd.org
> Subject: Re: authpf-like functionality via a web interface?
>
> On Tue, 2 Aug 2005 18:43:56 -0400
> "Barry, Christopher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
Hi,
I'm looking forward to talk to people who have experience using OpenBSD
in conjunction with WAN cards at E3 speed or faster. Searching the
archives didn't turn up anything.
Thank you!
Best,
--Toni++
I'm sorry, but my diagnosis wasn't correct. The "op( )"-type file
patterns simply doesn't seems to work properly in functions:
#!/bin/sh
function test
{
set -A arr $1
print [EMAIL PROTECTED]
print $1
}
test "*"
test "@(test.sh)"
$ ls
test.sh
$ ./test.sh
test.sh
test.sh
@(test.sh)
** Reply to message from Andreas Kahari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on
Wed, 3 Aug 2005 13:55:59 +0100
>See sh(1), under "Command execution":
>
>[...] Just to confuse things, if the posix option is turned off (see
>the set command below), some special commands are very special in that
>no field splitting,
** Reply to message from Otto Moerbeek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Wed, 3 Aug
2005 14:51:09 +0200 (CEST)
>On Wed, 3 Aug 2005, Dave Anderson wrote:
>
>> Something's screwy here, using the 'set -A' command in /bin/sh on
>> 3.7-release. AFAICT the complicated file-match expression should (in
>> this case
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of
> Rod.. Whitworth
> Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2005 9:04 PM
> To: Miscellaneous OBSD
> Subject: Ammunition needed to defend OpenBSD/pf
>
> Somebody sent me a query asking for a justification for my proposa
On Tue, 2 Aug 2005, Bob Beck wrote:
SNIP
> installer, and gives windows people putty with pages of 8x10 color
> glossy screenshots with circles and arrows and a paragraph on the back
> of each one explaining how to install putty and authenticate (and pick
> up the garbage).
your Windows users can
Hi jmc,
Thanks for your answer.
My connection works with an userland pppoe config (ppp.conf, ...).
I also tested with pf disabled. Same result... I cannot obtain my remote
address.
Unfortunately my local and remote (gateway) isp ip addresses are dynamic (so
I use wildcard addresses for both).
> I am trying to setup the new in-kernel pppoe on a openbsd
> 3.7-stable with a
> custom kernel.
> pppoe0: flags=8851 mtu 1492
>
> dev: ne3 state: session
>
> sid: 0xc368 PADI retries: 0 PADR retries: 0 time: 0:2:38
>
> inet 84.97.3.232 --> 0.0.0.1 netmask 0x
Hello all,
I've been setting up a hub and spoke VPN for a while now and for the
most part things are working as normal. However, I have one box a
netgear FVS318v1 that doesn't give me the flexibility in creating my VPN
policies and IKE setup that the other ones do (FVS318v3). I keep seeing
a no c
I've made up a test LAN built on two mini-ITX Via C3 based board to test
the AES encryption functionality of this CPU on a real setup.
I've used flashboot 0.7.2 from Damien simply for a matter of time (I've
some flash card already configured) and since it seems to me a very good
product, the kerne
I couldn't find a cksum file for any file in the release directory
ftp://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/3.#/*. I was just wanting to make
sure src.tar.gz was the correct file I was supposed to download.
POZDRAV !!!
Potovani/a eleo bih da Vam ponudim par nahina kako da dodjete do puno para,
za kratko vreme,na sasvim legalan i proveren nahin. U pitanju su dve online
banke i jedan MLM REPORT posao kojeg ja radim vef nekoliko godina i
Am Mittwoch, 3. August 2005 02:11 schrieben Sie:
Hi Sebastian,
> Are there any problems known with the raidframe-device?
Not that I know of.
> In my case: I've a IBM X330 with dual P3 800Mhz and 2 SCSI-HDDs.
> One is about 160Gb and the other is smaler. I created a raid for the /home
> but toda
Try to remove your /etc/mygate if exists.
>Hi,
>
>I have the same problem here in Hungary, running 3.7-
>(almost)stable. My ISP is Axelero (T-Online Hungary now) and the
>userland ppp worked like a charm. I switched to kernel pppoe but
>it only works if I specify the remote peer (gateway) IP addre
I do not know what a system looks like to an attacker trying to
fingerprint you using boxes from "Office Depot."
However, I would hope that using OpenBSD/pf that I could advertise the
fact that I am using OpenBSD/pf, and someone would just move on to their
next target.
Sincerely, Rob
At 04:30 AM 8/3/05, Alexander Farber wrote:
I have 1 argument for D-Link and against OpenBSD:
D-Link can DSL.
Does it really? My D-link router (at home) is tossing SYN attacks back to
the modem (as determined by ISP monitoring) causing the DSL modem to
lockup. I am eager to learn how to
On Wed, 2005-08-03 at 10:30 +0200, Alexander Farber wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have 1 argument for D-Link and against OpenBSD:
>
> D-Link can DSL. OpenBSD can not. So you have to
> buy at least a DSL modem for OpenBSD. And since you
> are buying a DSL modem, why not add 20 Euros and
> buy a DSL-router?
On 08/03/05 19:25, Shawn K. Quinn wrote:
You mean having the DSL router and modem be in the same physical box,
thus introducing a single point of failure? That's a huge minus.
??? You would prefer a milion boxes for each individual transistor or logic
gate?
Two boxes have two CPU's, two powe
On Wed, 2005-08-03 at 09:47 -0400, Will H. Backman wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
> Of
> > Rod.. Whitworth
> > Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2005 9:04 PM
> > To: Miscellaneous OBSD
> > Subject: Ammunition needed to defend OpenBSD/pf
On Wed, 2005-08-03 at 09:47 -0400, Will H. Backman wrote:
> Many of these devices provide the "what if I get hit by a bus"
> protection of a simple, single purpose system. If you use something
> like OpenBSD, it can be viewed as a homegrown application that must be
> supported by the organization,
On Wed, Aug 03, 2005 at 02:35:07AM -0700, J.C. Roberts wrote:
> your FUD" look, just level with them. "If you really want me to go
> into all the various technical details involved in a full source
> code audit the costs you would bear to do an equivalent audit on a
> closed source binary through r
That logic is completely false and you contradict yourself.
Allowing for multiple points of failure does not mean that something is
less
reliable as you have described. It means that if/when one fails, the
other
will still be available.
Using your example of a power supply lasting 10 years, that
On Wednesday 03 August 2005 01:15 pm, Jim O'Donald wrote:
> Using your example of a power supply lasting 10 years, that would
> translate to 2 failures in 10 years, not 1 failure in 5 years.
And if the box is properly designed, it will continue running unless both
power supplies fail simultaneousl
Hi all.
I'm setting up a laptop to generate test traffic against one of our APs so
that we can look at logs, pf configs etc. We have a Dell C840 laptop with
Proxim Orinoco 802.11b/g Gold PCMCIA card. As part of the testing, I'm
changing the MAC on the wireless card and refreshing the dhcp assi
On 08/03/05 20:55, Dave Feustel wrote:
On Wednesday 03 August 2005 01:15 pm, Jim O'Donald wrote:
Using your example of a power supply lasting 10 years, that would
translate to 2 failures in 10 years, not 1 failure in 5 years.
And if the box is properly designed, it will continue running unle
On 08/03/05 20:15, Jim O'Donald wrote:
That logic is completely false and you contradict yourself.
Pooh pooh.
Allowing for multiple points of failure does not mean that something is
less reliable as you have described. It means that if/when one fails, the
other will still be available.
But
I'm making OpenBSD's presence known at the OSCON expo right now,
sharing a booth with the FreeBSD/PC-BSD folks. They've been overly
generous, even allowing me to setup the OpenBSD/CARP/pfsync demo
servers that will also be in use at my presentation tomorrow (http://
conferences.oreillynet.c
On Wed, 3 Aug 2005 12:12:31 +0200
Markus Friedl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 05:02:05PM +0200, umaxx wrote:
> > # ifconfig tun0 create
> > # ifconfig tun0 10.0.0.1 10.0.0.2 up
>
> try
> ifconfig tun0 10.0.0.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 link0
>
>
thanks a lot, works fi
On 8/3/05, Matt Garman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think everyone on this list has done a wonderful job explaining
> why an OpenBSD box will beat the D-Link practically hands-down.
>
> The cynical side of me thinks that managers, no matter how great the
> reality of OpenBSD, are likely to rejec
I want to upgrade my OpenBSD firewall box and I want to know: "is really
OK the version 3.7"?
Thanks,
Denis
There are exemples for this configuration?
Thanks,
Denis
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 29, 2005 4:12 AM
To: Sean Knox
Cc: jeff; misc@openbsd.org; jking1
Subject: Re: DDOS Attack!!!who can help me?
Define a filter to drop t
Are there any 'known' issues with pppoe in userland under 3.7-stable?
At times I am seeing a serious slowdown (6mb DSL line drops to less
than 2K/sec) - and rebooting the router will fix this.
Prior to reboot - there is nothing in pflog or any log file
indicating any issues whatsoever - even
Hi,
did anyone here allready had a look at this book?
http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/mfreeopenbsd/index.html
After having read the sample chapter available for download, I'm
not yet convinced that it may be really interesting, and from the
title, TOC, and the reviews O'Reilly mentions[1], one co
Doing it with the TARGET=mvme68k yileds the same results (failure) at the
same point in the build as seen below:
-
./xgcc -B./ -I/usr/cross/mvme68k/usr/include -O2
-I/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/gcc/../../lib/libiberty/include -DIN_GCC
-DCROSS_COMPILE
-W -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototypes -
On 8/3/05, Denis Augusto Araujo de Souza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I want to upgrade my OpenBSD firewall box and I want to know: "is really
> OK the version 3.7"?
In my experience, every release version of OpenBSD has been"OK",
ready for production use the day it is officially released. This i
chefren wrote:
Two equal power supplies "in line": Twice as much the risk of a
brakedown of the system and two times as much failures of power supplies.
Lets see.
Let X be the (boolean) random variable designating ''system X breaks
down in the first N years''. Equally, let Y be the random va
Hello,
I have disabled AH in sysctl but... nothing...
Thanks in advance,
Helio.
This are my sysctl.conf and isakmpd debug
net.inet.ip.forwarding=1# 1=Permit forwarding (routing) of
packets
net.inet6.ip6.forwarding=1 # 1=Permit forwarding (routing) of
packets
#net.inet6.ip6.accept_rta
For those interested, NedBSD has published a interview with Joris Vink
about OpenCVS.
The interview is at http://nedbsd.nl/modules/static/page/JorisVinkInterview
- Wijnand
On Wed, Aug 03, 2005 at 11:01:48PM +0200, Wijnand Wiersma wrote:
> The interview is at http://nedbsd.nl/modules/static/page/JorisVinkInterview
| Anything you want to add to this interview?
|
| Humppa!
I wonder wether the 3.8 song will be Humppa style. Seems to be some
kind of hype nowadays.
Cia
2005/8/3, Matthias Kilian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Wed, Aug 03, 2005 at 11:01:48PM +0200, Wijnand Wiersma wrote:
> > The interview is at http://nedbsd.nl/modules/static/page/JorisVinkInterview
>
> | Anything you want to add to this interview?
> |
> | Humppa!
>
> I wonder wether the 3.8 song will
please delete my details [EMAIL PROTECTED] as,I have never asked for
this service
On 8/3/05, Matt Garman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The cynical side of me thinks that managers, no matter how great the
> reality of OpenBSD, are likely to reject it based on a fear
> and/or ignorance of open source, or with logic like, "Well if it's
> so good, how come I've never heard of it?"
T
On 08/03/05 22:48, Jesper Louis Andersen wrote:
..
So you forget the last term by saying ''twice as much''. You have to
deduct the probability that both events occur (or it would have been
''counted'' twice).
Mathematically correct, but not realistic if one power supply fails in the
serial
"J.D. Bronson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Are there any 'known' issues with pppoe in userland under 3.7-stable?
Yes, it eats a lot of CPU. Try using kernel pppoe since that uses less
CPU. On 1 MBit, it won't be a problem, but with 2 MBit, userland pppoe
could already be a problem. And you have
> etc and works fine. When we change the MAC to something random with ifconfig
> and then associate, we get nothing.
No surprise here. When you change the lladdr you're only changing
what's sent as the source ethernet address on ethernet-style frames.
This will not affect the 802.11 level station
This is what I have that I got working 2+ years ago... Hope this helps.
[Netgear-FVS318-main-mode]
EXCHANGE_TYPE= ID_PROT
Transforms=3DES-SHA,AES-SHA
[Netgear-FVS318-quick-mode]
DOI=IPSEC
EXCHANGE_TYPE=QUICK_MODE
Suites=QM-ESP-3DES-SHA-PFS-SUITE,QM-ESP-AES-SHA-PFS-SUITE
[AES-SHA]
just use some 50cal BMG rounds, that should be effective ammunition.
sorry, I just had to after following this thread for awhile
Rod.. Whitworth wrote:
Somebody sent me a query asking for a justification for my proposal to
supply a firewall/router using OpenBSD when there was thsi device:
http://www.dlink.com/products/?pid=327 , with all its claimed bells and
whistles.
Well, I we connected a new client with straight eth
I installed OBSD3.7 on my laptop. Things that are not working are:
sound and modem (dial-up internal laptop modem) and apm.
For modem, sound and apm it says: "Device not configured". For APM I
tried to set the apmd_flags=YES in rc.conf. For sound and modem I
tried the things that are described in
Z L wrote:
I installed OBSD3.7 on my laptop. Things that are not working are:
sound and modem (dial-up internal laptop modem) and apm.
For modem, sound and apm it says: "Device not configured". For APM I
tried to set the apmd_flags=YES in rc.conf. For sound and modem I
tried the things that are
Dear Fool,
You've subscribed to the following Motley Fool Free Emails where we deliver our
best financial insights right to your inbox:
FoolWatch Daily
FoolWatch Weekly
Special Offers
Personal Finance
Investing Strategies: Mutual Funds
Investing Strategies: Value Plays
Investing Strategies: Re
The VT1211 chip is now supported thanks to some excellent work by
Alexander Yurchenko. Thanks for all the help, Alexander!
The Lex box actually keeps quite cool (~48 C) regardless of load,
probably due to the cpu-heatpipe. When I replace the hard drive with a
flash it will probably drop a coup
72 matches
Mail list logo
