Kenneth R Westerback wrote:
>man release
>
> Ken
>
>On Fri, Jul 08, 2005 at 05:18:44PM +0100, Jonas Melian wrote:
>
>
>>I'm trying build openbsd from source with 'make release'. In the first,
>>I updated from release to stable.
>>
>>But i always get the same error.
>>_
>>install -C -o ro
--On 09 July 2005 09:14 +0100, Jonas Melian wrote:
I followed 'http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq5.html'.
What happens is that 'Building a Release' is in a different point
(5.4) and it seems that it doesn't have anything to do with the
previous point. When it depends on the previous point (5.3.5) f
On 7/9/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >From a Toshiba Satellite, maybe not too dissimilar:
> I assume the Q of "pckbc0 ISA Q Port 0x60/5" is a typo
> Seems to be a pckbc0 and a pckbd0
> Beyond that I'm out of my depth. (way out;)
> Loading...
> probing: pc0 mem[639K 478M a20=on]
On 7/9/05, Z L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Also, I cannot get dmesg because it just doesn't boot! :-(
You may be able to get a dmesg using a serial console. If your laptop
has a serial port, that is. I'm not sure how common those ports
(still) are, given the omnipresence of USB ports these days.
Hi All,
I have 2 ISP(diagram in attachment) pf to forward the packet based on
PF: Address Pools and Load
Balancing(http://www.openbsd.org.my/faq/pf/pools.html).
For this setup I use static routing. My problem is sometime the
network is slow. I mean when browse web to our internal server (from
ou
ALERT!
This e-mail, in its original form, contained one or more attached files that
were infected with a virus, worm, or other type of security threat. This e-mail
was sent from a Road Runner IP address. As part of our continuing initiative to
stop the spread of malicious viruses, Road Runner s
Hi,
did anyone played with a notebook powered by an AMD Turion ?
<<< Please check your PC by antivirus software >>>
The following message sent by this account has violated system policy:
From: misc@openbsd.org
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2005 00:48:05 +0900
Subject: Delivery reports about your e-mail
The following violations were detected:
File A
Hello,
Im having difficulty with a intel wireless card. The kernel says is
"iwi0: device timeout" and this happens about 3 seconds after /etc/netstart.
However I worked out if you very quickly use the network before this msg
has a chance to show, it will work for a while ( maybe hours sometime
I have a system with 2 Atheros Cards (1 generic oem & 1 wistron branded)
installed on a VIA EPIA MS 8000E motherboard using a active pci riser card.
The system locks hard upon boot if the generic oem card is set to 802.11a
hostap mode. I initially thought it was a irq issues so I diabled everythi
On Sat, Jul 09, 2005 at 09:14:21AM +0100, Jonas Melian wrote:
> What happens is that 'Building a Release' is in a different point
> (5.4) and it seems that it doesn't have anything to do with the
> previous point. When it depends on the previous point (5.3.5) for
> build the release. That confuses
Just thought I'd give an update on this thread for the archives, and
see if anyone has an idea how to fix my WEP problem.
I pulled out a new(er) p3-500 to replace the p-233 that I started this
thread with. It still reports as pci 2.1, but the card works in
hostap mode in this machine, mostly. If
hallo, heute ist es endlich soweit, ich gebe dir meine handynummer:
0160/99206935, du bist einer der ersten menschen denen ich sie
anvertraue, so kvnnen wir immer per sms in kontakt bleiben, denn ich habe
es immer dabei! wirst du mir ganz schnell schreiben, ja? liebe gr|sse,
deine anja >
Nevermind that "almost working" comment, if I walk more than 15 feet
away from the base station the signal goes from 75 to 0. Time to dump
this cheap card. Does anyone know if ath works well with a pci 2.1?
-Matt Brenneke
On 7/9/05, Matt Brenneke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just thought I'd gi
If I'm reading it correctly, this bit of the dmesg says that my hard
drive is not using DMA -- and so is running very inefficiently:
wdc0 at isa0 port 0x1f0/8 irq 14
wd0 at wdc0 channel 0 drive 0:
wd0: 16-sector PIO, LBA, 9765MB, 1728 sectors
wd0(wdc0:0:0): using BIOS timings
This isn't a bi
A P90 without IDE DMA, I am not surprised...
On Jul 9, 2005, at 7:27 PM, Dave Anderson wrote:
If I'm reading it correctly, this bit of the dmesg says that my hard
drive is not using DMA -- and so is running very inefficiently:
wdc0 at isa0 port 0x1f0/8 irq 14
wd0 at wdc0 channel 0 drive 0:
wd
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
so spake "Dave Anderson" (dave):
> If I'm reading it correctly, this bit of the dmesg says that my hard
> drive is not using DMA -- and so is running very inefficiently:
The IDE controller on that machine does not have working PCI-based
IDE so you are stuck
I would suggest trying out 3.7, or at least this errata
patch.
ftp://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/patches/3.6/common/006_xl.patch
On Fri, Jul 08, 2005 at 03:38:11PM +0200, Bolke de Bruin wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have had the following error on Openbsd 3.6/Sparc with a 3com 905:
>
> ping: no buffer
just curious, anyone know what happend to undeadly?
been down for nearly two days now. do they need a new server or something, it
looks like its hosted by bob so he should be able to come up with something :-)
its not fun when your homepage is down
sbr.
** Reply to message from "Todd C. Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
on Sat, 09 Jul 2005 18:55:03 -0600
>In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> so spake "Dave Anderson" (dave):
>
>> If I'm reading it correctly, this bit of the dmesg says that my hard
>> drive is not using DMA -- and so is running very in
Dave Anderson wrote:
> If I'm reading it correctly, this bit of the dmesg says that my hard
> drive is not using DMA -- and so is running very inefficiently:
>
> wdc0 at isa0 port 0x1f0/8 irq 14
> wd0 at wdc0 channel 0 drive 0:
> wd0: 16-sector PIO, LBA, 9765MB, 1728 sectors
> wd0(wdc0:0:0):
Hi!
I'm planning my first OpenBSD deployment and was wondering about a NFS
technique. In the past I've setup a firewall behind an office network,
giving a gang of contractors an internet gateway and access to a CVSROOT
via samba. The actual CVSROOT was mounted on the firewall via NFS from
the offi
** Reply to message from Nick Holland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on
Sun, 10 Jul 2005 00:16:57 -0400
>Something I have had good luck with on SOME old Dell BIOSs is to
>hard-code the drive parameters as 1024/16/63 (504M), rather than
>autodetecting. As long as your root partition is in that first 504M,
>t
23 matches
Mail list logo
