--On 08 May 2005 20:43 -0300, Juan Vera wrote:
vi) vi /etc/pf.conf
It might be useful to have this run 'pf test' automatically afterwards,
like nsh does. You may also consider having either 'test', 'reload', or
a separate command, check-in the file with RCS or CVS - keeping a
revision h
Thank you, Adam, your trolling induced me to plug something in at
google and browse a bit:
http://www.google.com/
search?hl=en&lr=&q=%22C%23%22%2B%22performance%22%2B%22java%22
The ones I found particularly interesting were these two:
http://www.sosnoski.com/presents/dotnetusers/java-dotnet.ht
On Sun, May 8, 2005 11:00 am, Dave Feustel wrote:
> Can the malware at Gookle.com described at the link
> crack OpenBSD and/or Konqueror? (I am far from an expert, so I practice
> 'better safe
> than sorry' when I see f-secure's explicit warnings).
Well, aside from the win32-centric nature of that
Hello folks,
1.) Do you plan to distribute several MTAs, like NetBSD currently does? Or
do you already (first check said no, but maybe I missed something)?
2.) Do you plan to distribute PAM in base?
3.) Did anybody look close enough on TenDRA yet? I'd like to know how much
GNUism is in OpenBSDs
re
the source is freely available and that along w/ cvs
logs shall give you answers to most of your questions
cu
Making, drinking tea and reading an opus magnum from Sascha Retzki:
> Hello folks,
>
> 1.) Do you plan to distribute several MTAs, like NetBSD currently does? Or
> do you already (firs
Hello!
I'm no official OpenBSD developper, it's just my impressions.
On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 05:16:14PM +0200, Sascha Retzki wrote:
>Hello folks,
>1.) Do you plan to distribute several MTAs, like NetBSD currently does? Or
>do you already (first check said no, but maybe I missed something)?
I do
You should do your homework before posting questions like these.
On 5/9/05, Sascha Retzki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 1.) Do you plan to distribute several MTAs, like NetBSD currently does? Or
> do you already (first check said no, but maybe I missed something)?
If by 'distribute' you mean 'dist
On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 11:10:38PM +0200, GV wrote:
> Now, the above should normally block all the traffic to my server - but it
> doesn't! Am I missing something here?
>
> Also, I followed the section "Packet Logging Through Syslog" in
> "http://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/logging.html"; and created
On 5/9/05, Rogier Krieger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Currently, OpenBSD includes XFree86 4.4.0.
That is, includes an unencumbered X. See the FAQ (#1) on this.
Cheers,
Rogier
--
If you don't know where you're going, any road will get you there.
All these questions have been thoroughly discussed on [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please
search the archives for detailed information. I'll add quick notes as
I'm waiting for something to finish right now and have a quick moment
with nothing better to do.
It's worth noting that I'm not a developer, so I'
* Rogier Krieger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-05-09 18:09]:
> On 5/9/05, Rogier Krieger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Currently, OpenBSD includes XFree86 4.4.0.
>
> That is, includes an unencumbered X. See the FAQ (#1) on this.
to be clear, OpenBSD includes X.org these days. The latest XFree we
sh
* Sascha Retzki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-05-09 17:22]:
> 1.) Do you plan to distribute several MTAs, like NetBSD currently does?
hah. besides that beeing stupid, let's see what options we have...
-qmail: unfree
-postfix: unfree
-exim: dunno license currently, but awkward 80s design, poor
implem
> 1.) Do you plan to distribute several MTAs, like NetBSD currently does? Or
> do you already (first check said no, but maybe I missed something)?
There are no such plans; other MTA are available in the ports tree.
> 2.) Do you plan to distribute PAM in base?
No. OpenBSD uses so-called ``BSD aut
> http://www.openbsd.org/lyrics.html#36 comes to mind. Currently,
> OpenBSD includes XFree86 4.4.0.
No, currently, OpenBSD includes X.org 6.8.2. OpenBSD has NEVER included
XFree86 4.4.0, which is not considered free enough. What has been
included in 3.6 was all the ``old-license'' XFree86 code, wi
On Monday 09 May 2005 09:16 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Sun, May 8, 2005 11:00 am, Dave Feustel wrote:
> > Can the malware at Gookle.com described at the link
> > crack OpenBSD and/or Konqueror? (I am far from an expert, so I practice
> > 'better safe
> > than sorry' when I see f-secure's exp
Hello misc,
I'm installing packages from the 3.7 cd and only use the ports to
build those that
are not present there.
Installing certain packages from ports fails when one of the
prerequisite has already
been installed as a package from the cd. Should the port
infrastructure check for
prerequisit
Quoting Sascha Retzki ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> 3.) Did anybody look close enough on TenDRA yet? I'd like to know how much
> GNUism is in OpenBSDs base, building mechanism, so basicly it adds up to:
> How long do we/you have to wait till TenDRA can be used?
Tendra is, unfortunately, not that interes
On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 09:08:38AM -0700, Ben Goren wrote:
> Unix uses X for its windowing environment. If and when this ever
> changes, I'm sure The Powers That Be will consider the alternatives.
>
> Until then, this is like asking if people like using spoons for their
> soup, and if they'd con
On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 06:13:19PM +0200, Henning Brauer wrote:
> * Sascha Retzki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-05-09 17:22]:
> > 1.) Do you plan to distribute several MTAs, like NetBSD currently does?
>
> hah. besides that beeing stupid, let's see what options we have...
amen.
> > 2.) Do you plan to
On Mon, 9 May 2005 07:40:10 +0100
Joseph Kiniry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > While I guess I should have been a little more specific to only
> > include
> > languages that have enough libraries to be useful, and obviously
> > purely functional languages aren't comparable, you ignoring the
> >
well, the silly one is simply me! I didn't see that after a "pf=YES" entry, it
was one with a "NO"!!!
Thanks
George
On Monday 09 May 2005 17:53, Jason Opperisano wrote:
> On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 11:10:38PM +0200, GV wrote:
> > Now, the above should normally block all the traffic to my server -
On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 07:38:16PM +0200, Jesper Louis Andersen wrote:
> Quoting Sascha Retzki ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> > 3.) Did anybody look close enough on TenDRA yet? I'd like to know how much
> > GNUism is in OpenBSDs base, building mechanism, so basicly it adds up to:
> > How long do we/you
Quoting Anil Madhavapeddy ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Yeah, Tendra's pretty dead. I'd wager it would be to easier to glue
> a register allocator onto /usr/ports/devel/cil and have a nice clean
> start.
Rather nice thought. While we are at it why don't we take most of the ccured
code in and bind with t
Hi all
I'm having a peculiar problem with 'tcpdump' on a OpenBSD 3.7 (20050404
snap) amd64. ('dmesg, + 'sysctl' + 'fstab' are below)
tcpdump with 0-2 flags = output.
tcpdump with 3-x flags = no output.
tcpdump with x flags and '-w' = non written at all.
When 'tcpdump' is stopped I recive normal '
Subject of the message: Re:
Recipient of the message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Quoting Anil Madhavapeddy ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
>> Yeah, Tendra's pretty dead. I'd wager it would be to easier to glue
>> a register allocator onto /usr/ports/devel/cil and have a nice clean
>> start.
>
> Rather nice thought. While we are at it why don't we take most of the
> ccured
> code in an
> Some birds told me Theo got a hint about a compiler at the FosDem...
> And yes gcc will be replaced one day... but not now, nor in 3.8...
> Maybe in 3.9/4.0..
Some birds tell me you speak out of your arse. Even if the plan9
compiler looks nice.
> So maybe the Dev-team would be so friendly to wr
I think the HISTORY section is wrong. But I do not know what it supposed to
read.
http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi?query=stat&apropos=0&sektion=0&manpath=OpenBSD+Current&arch=i386&format=html
Cheers,
Brian
Take Yahoo! Mail with you! Check email on your mobile phone.
http://mobile.yahoo.c
How is it wrong? Is it in 3.7 or earlier?
On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 03:05:40PM -0700, Brian wrote:
:I think the HISTORY section is wrong. But I do not know what it supposed to
:read.
:
:http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi?query=stat&apropos=0&sektion=0&manpath=OpenBSD+Current&arch=i386&format
On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 03:05:40PM -0700, Brian wrote:
> I think the HISTORY section is wrong. But I do not know what it supposed to
> read.
No, it's just right.
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
so spake Brian (bwaichu):
> I think the HISTORY section is wrong. But I do not know what it supposed to
> read.
It is not wrong; stat(1) was added post-3.7 therefore the first release
it is included in will be 3.8.
- todd
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> I personaly don't care a lot for the compiler (even i would prefere a
>> BSD-Licensed compiler)... but for the drivers (e.g. ath for amd64).
>> And after I bought an ath-base card I noticed why ppl. wanna get
>> ral-based cards...
>
> Why is ral preferred over ath (in
--On 09 May 2005 23:05 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So maybe the Dev-team would be so friendly to write (for 3.8. e.g.?)
the archs behind the drivers.
The list of drivers supported on each arch, are on the webpage about
that arch.
> I think the HISTORY section is wrong. But I do not know what it supposed to
> read.
You are possibly confused because that page talks about a command
rather than the system call.
>> Some birds told me Theo got a hint about a compiler at the FosDem...
>> And yes gcc will be replaced one day... but not now, nor in 3.8...
>> Maybe in 3.9/4.0..
>
> Some birds tell me you speak out of your arse. Even if the plan9
> compiler looks nice.
>
You made my day! Still grinning :-)
Jonat
On 05/10/05 00:17, Todd C. Miller wrote:
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
so spake Brian (bwaichu):
I think the HISTORY section is wrong. But I do not know what it supposed to
read.
It is not wrong; stat(1) was added post-3.7 therefore the first release
it is included in will be 3.8.
- to
On 2005 May 9, at 2:23 PM, Miod Vallat wrote:
> Even if the plan9
> compiler looks nice.
Forgive me if I'm out of the loop, but has the license changed since
two years ago?
http://www.monkey.org/openbsd/archive/misc/0306/msg01274.html
(That's just the start of the thread. Read at least th
I'm trying to build a 3.7 kernel for an old HP Pavilion (P6 466)
but each kernel I build has problems with processes (like sshd) which
it declares are "killed due to lack of floating point support".
I'm not sure what the problem is, since GENERIC works okay without
the option GPL_MATH_EMULATE ...
Custom Kernels are *NOT* supported. You commented out required stuff.
Just run GENERIC. Don't try to figure out what you commented out
wrongly, just use GENERIC.
http://openbsd.org/faq/faq5.html#Why
On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 07:18:45PM -0600, Jack J. Woehr wrote:
:I'm trying to build a 3.7 ke
> --On 09 May 2005 23:05 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> So maybe the Dev-team would be so friendly to write (for 3.8. e.g.?)
>> the archs behind the drivers.
>
> The list of drivers supported on each arch, are on the webpage about
> that arch.
Why?
http://www.openbsd.org/37.html
Lets read i
Peter Hessler wrote:
>
> Custom Kernels are *NOT* supported. You commented out required stuff.
> Just run GENERIC. Don't try to figure out what you commented out
> wrongly, just use GENERIC.
Oh, be that way :-) This "custom kernels not supported" stuff must be
a fairly recent doctrine. I've bee
> > Custom Kernels are *NOT* supported. You commented out required stuff.
> > Just run GENERIC. Don't try to figure out what you commented out
> > wrongly, just use GENERIC.
>
> Oh, be that way :-) This "custom kernels not supported" stuff must be
> a fairly recent doctrine. I've been customizin
On 5/9/05, Jack J. Woehr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm not sure what the problem is, since GENERIC works okay without
> the option GPL_MATH_EMULATE ... was it the commenting out of
> 586 support for this allegedly 686-class box?
Just to clarify: GENERIC works fine?
aaron.glenn
* Ben Goren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-05-10 01:31]:
> On 2005 May 9, at 2:23 PM, Miod Vallat wrote:
>
> > Even if the plan9
> > compiler looks nice.
>
> Forgive me if I'm out of the loop, but has the license changed since
> two years ago?
yes, that's the entire point.
--
BS Web Services, http
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-05-10 02:16]:
> Why?
> http://www.openbsd.org/37.html
>
> Lets read it together:
>
> "Improved hardware support, including:"
> - a lot of drivers
it nowhere sdays on all archs. learn to read.
the platform pages clearly state what is supported on whi
Aaron Glenn wrote:
>
> On 5/9/05, Jack J. Woehr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'm not sure what the problem is, since GENERIC works okay without
> > the option GPL_MATH_EMULATE ... was it the commenting out of
> > 586 support for this allegedly 686-class box?
>
> Just to clarify: GENERIC works f
Theo de Raadt wrote:
>
> They why did you mail out a configuration file that removed the floating
> point npx driver?
So that someone would point out that I had removed the floating point npx
driver.
Thanks for answering my question!
> That is why we do not support people like you. You make s
On 2005 May 9, at 6:09 PM, Henning Brauer wrote:
>>> Even if the plan9
>>> compiler looks nice.
>>
>> Forgive me if I'm out of the loop, but has the license changed since
>> two years ago?
>
> yes, that's the entire point.
I don't suppose anybody could elaborate? I'm not having any luck
finding
Ben, Henning's, "yes, that's the entire point," referred to there being no
plan9 code that is reusable in OpenBSD, it was not saying that there was
suddenly a relicensing.
As to when OpenBSD will be GCCless, well, start a project to make a compiler
that is liberally licensed and supports all of
Hi
Thanks, for your replies. I have some additional information now -
the cisco config (below) - though it still looks quite sensibly configured
(to someone who doent know any cisco commands ;)), and
the errors remain :(
Regards, Richard
--- Erik Carlseen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It would
50 matches
Mail list logo
