Thanks for all your answers. Sorry for creating all that fuss -- I
should have interpreted Theo's answer correctly.
Martin
[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type application/pgp-signature which had
a name of signature.asc]
On 10/05/07, Emilio Perea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 12:10:13AM +0200, Martin Toft wrote:
> Nobody answered my second "question" though :) Maybe nobody knows the
> answer? :)
> Summary: I was once told not to use openbsd.org; it was said that
> www.openbsd.org was the only
On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 12:10:13AM +0200, Martin Toft wrote:
> Nobody answered my second "question" though :) Maybe nobody knows the
> answer? :)
> Summary: I was once told not to use openbsd.org; it was said that
> www.openbsd.org was the only valid site (ignoring mirror sites). Is this
> just bul
On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 12:10:13AM +0200, Martin Toft wrote:
> Nobody answered my second "question" though :) Maybe nobody knows
> the answer? :) Summary: I was once told not to use openbsd.org; it
> was said that www.openbsd.org was the only valid site (ignoring
> mirror sites). Is this just bulls
On 5/10/07, Martin Toft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, May 09, 2007 at 06:33:19PM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> > 1. www.openbsd.org replies with "Forbidden" at the moment -- but I
> > guess most people already know.
>
> www.openbsd.org is a mirror on a good network connection.
>
> at the mom
On Wed, May 09, 2007 at 06:33:19PM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> > 1. www.openbsd.org replies with "Forbidden" at the moment -- but I
> > guess most people already know.
>
> www.openbsd.org is a mirror on a good network connection.
>
> at the moment it is recovering from having eaten itself.
Thank
On 5/9/07, Theo de Raadt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > 1. www.openbsd.org replies with "Forbidden" at the moment -- but I guess
> > most people already know.
>
> www.openbsd.org is a mirror on a good network connection.
>
> at the moment it is recovering from having eaten itself.
>
>
Like the sn
> 1. www.openbsd.org replies with "Forbidden" at the moment -- but I guess
> most people already know.
www.openbsd.org is a mirror on a good network connection.
at the moment it is recovering from having eaten itself.
You can still get to the FAQ. I have a search box setup in FF and I
was able to get to it...
So the whole site ain't down, probably a permissions issue???
On 5/9/07, Martin Toft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Two small things:
1. www.openbsd.org replies with "Forbidden" at the moment -- but I gue
Two small things:
1. www.openbsd.org replies with "Forbidden" at the moment -- but I guess
most people already know.
2. Long time ago I was told that I shouldn't use openbsd.org, as it
wasn't/isn't the official site. I was told to always use the www
subdomain. Maybe this was just some people pull
10 matches
Mail list logo
