On Tue, Apr 03, 2007 at 11:58:10AM -0700, Bryan Irvine wrote:
> >Real men use ed, you misguided fool.
>
> ed? is that like pico? ;)
Please don't bitch on ed(1).
- It's great if you have to make trivial changes for ${CUSTOMER}, and
want to get your money -- i.e. use emacs(1) or vi(1) and ${CU
On 11:14 Tue 03 Apr , Kjell Wooding wrote:
> Mwa-ha-ha
>
> -kj
You got me, too... Very nice.
Regards,
Julian
On 4/3/07, Kjell Wooding <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, Apr 03, 2007 at 12:57:09PM -0400, Nick ! wrote:
> >>> mg is a fine little editor, but it just seems so emacs-centric.
> >>> This little diff fixes that. Please test and get back to me.
> >>>
> >>> Maybe *now* we'll get some users.
> >> [
On 4/1/07, Grumpy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Why don't you guys just use vi like real men?
Real men use ed, you misguided fool.
ed? is that like pico? ;)
On Tue, Apr 03, 2007 at 01:58:42PM -0400, Christopher Linn wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 03, 2007 at 11:14:48AM -0600, Kjell Wooding wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 03, 2007 at 12:57:09PM -0400, Nick ! wrote:
> > > >>> mg is a fine little editor, but it just seems so emacs-centric.
> > > >>> This little diff fixes t
Kjell Wooding wrote:
>
> Mwa-ha-ha
OK you got me! It was a lot of work for a 4-1 joke.
Congratulations. :-)
# Han
On Tue, Apr 03, 2007 at 11:14:48AM -0600, Kjell Wooding wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 03, 2007 at 12:57:09PM -0400, Nick ! wrote:
> > >>> mg is a fine little editor, but it just seems so emacs-centric.
> > >>> This little diff fixes that. Please test and get back to me.
> > >>>
> > >>> Maybe *now* we'll get
On Tue, Apr 03, 2007 at 10:23:25AM -0400, jared r r spiegel wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 01, 2007 at 12:58:38PM -0600, Kjell Wooding wrote:
> > mg is a fine little editor, but it just seems so emacs-centric.
> > This little diff fixes that. Please test and get back to me.
> >
> > Maybe *now* we'll get som
On Tue, Apr 03, 2007 at 12:57:09PM -0400, Nick ! wrote:
> >>> mg is a fine little editor, but it just seems so emacs-centric.
> >>> This little diff fixes that. Please test and get back to me.
> >>>
> >>> Maybe *now* we'll get some users.
> >> [.]
> >
> >I wouldn't expect much further developme
On 4/3/07, Nick Holland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
jared r r spiegel wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 01, 2007 at 12:58:38PM -0600, Kjell Wooding wrote:
>> mg is a fine little editor, but it just seems so emacs-centric.
>> This little diff fixes that. Please test and get back to me.
>>
>> Maybe *now* we'll g
jared r r spiegel wrote:
On Sun, Apr 01, 2007 at 12:58:38PM -0600, Kjell Wooding wrote:
mg is a fine little editor, but it just seems so emacs-centric.
This little diff fixes that. Please test and get back to me.
Maybe *now* we'll get some users.
clarification wise, this diff is just to sup
On Sun, Apr 01, 2007 at 12:58:38PM -0600, Kjell Wooding wrote:
> mg is a fine little editor, but it just seems so emacs-centric.
> This little diff fixes that. Please test and get back to me.
>
> Maybe *now* we'll get some users.
clarification wise, this diff is just to support the concept
of
Hi Kjell,
I just tried your patch and this happened:
m-x vi-mode
i
Too many modes
I don't know much about vi but that looks odd.
# Han
On Mon, Apr 02, 2007 at 01:42:38AM +0300, Denis Doroshenko wrote:
> Kjell, may be mg's gonna be even better vi than vi itself? :-)
Of course it will. It has an emacs mode.
;)
-kj
On 01 Apr 2007 22:24:23 +0200, Artur Grabowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Marco Peereboom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Why don't you guys just use vi like real men?
>
> :-)
$ ls -l /usr/bin/{vi,mg}
-r-xr-xr-x 1 root bin 105508 Mar 14 16:46 /usr/bin/mg
-r-xr-xr-x 3 root bin 277820 Mar 14
Grumpy wrote:
Why don't you guys just use vi like real men?
Real men use ed, you misguided fool.
real men don't use a text editor. they have a secretary to do the dirty
work.
On 4/1/07, Kjell Wooding <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
mg is a fine little editor, but it just seems so emacs-centric.
This little diff fixes that. Please test and get back to me.
Maybe *now* we'll get some users.
-kj
The reason I use mg is *for* the emacs-keys, and that backspace at the
start
On Sunday 01 April 2007 22:12:33 Marco Peereboom wrote:
> Why don't you guys just use vi like real men?
its all about the quotes!
felix
Marco Peereboom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Why don't you guys just use vi like real men?
>
> :-)
$ ls -l /usr/bin/{vi,mg}
-r-xr-xr-x 1 root bin 105508 Mar 14 16:46 /usr/bin/mg
-r-xr-xr-x 3 root bin 277820 Mar 14 16:46 /usr/bin/vi
//art
> Why don't you guys just use vi like real men?
Real men use ed, you misguided fool.
Grumpy
Why don't you guys just use vi like real men?
:-)
On Sun, Apr 01, 2007 at 12:58:38PM -0600, Kjell Wooding wrote:
> mg is a fine little editor, but it just seems so emacs-centric.
> This little diff fixes that. Please test and get back to me.
>
> Maybe *now* we'll get some users.
>
> -kj
>
> In
mg is a fine little editor, but it just seems so emacs-centric.
This little diff fixes that. Please test and get back to me.
Maybe *now* we'll get some users.
-kj
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.bin/mg/Makefile,v
retrievi
22 matches
Mail list logo
