On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 10:11:17PM +0100, Marc Espie wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 09:56:18PM +0100, Matthias Kilian wrote:
> > Next time when I'm in a condition similar to that in vienna after
> > p2k8, I'll test *all* installers of *all* existing operation systems.
> > I'm sure I'd managed to
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 09:56:18PM +0100, Matthias Kilian wrote:
> Next time when I'm in a condition similar to that in vienna after
> p2k8, I'll test *all* installers of *all* existing operation systems.
> I'm sure I'd managed to do a perfect installation of OpenBSD; but
> pirofti@ may disagree ;-
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 06:38:07PM +0100, Pau wrote:
> "For those new to NetBSD, the early user experience can be poor. This
> is especially true when coming from a Windows, Mac or Linux
> backgrounds. While basically sound, the installer asks many detailed
> questions and is unintuitive. If new us
On Mon, February 23, 2009 17:02, Lars NoodC)n wrote:
> Dave Wilson wrote:
>> ... I find OpenBSD remarkably user-friendly. Almost everything I want
>> is already in base, most things are set up with intelligent and safe
>> defaults...
>
> +1
>
> Also, there is *really* good documentation. Concise a
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 10:48 AM, Dave Wilson
wrote:
> On the contrary, I find OpenBSD remarkably user-friendly. Almost
> everything I want is already in base, most things are set up with
> intelligent and safe defaults, I can't even remember the last time I had
> to even *have* an xorg.conf, let
Dave Wilson wrote:
> ... I find OpenBSD remarkably user-friendly. Almost everything I want
> is already in base, most things are set up with intelligent and safe
> defaults...
+1
Also, there is *really* good documentation. Concise at times, but not
deficient.
-Lars
""
???
sorry, sir; I think you got me wrong
I agree 100% with you.
I want OpenBSD to stay like it is now. I was giving net as an example
of what I wouldn't like to see happening to obsd
And I only have this OS on my computers.
A big thank you to all obsd developers for
contributing/making/imp
> Only one OS has been holding out against HappyNewWorld's rampaging
> user-friendliness, GUIs & co. armies: OpenBSD!
On the contrary, I find OpenBSD remarkably user-friendly. Almost
everything I want is already in base, most things are set up with
intelligent and safe defaults, I can't even rem
Ok that thread is funny. Very very funny.
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 06:38:07PM +0100, Pau wrote:
> ... bsd has fallen
>
> ---
> http://mail-index.netbsd.org/current-users/2009/02/07/msg007841.html
>
> "For those new to NetBSD, the early user experience
... bsd has fallen
---
http://mail-index.netbsd.org/current-users/2009/02/07/msg007841.html
"For those new to NetBSD, the early user experience can be poor. This
is especially true when coming from a Windows, Mac or Linux
backgrounds. While basically so
10 matches
Mail list logo
