On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 5:44 AM, Glen Anderson wrote:
> Ultimately I think there should be a note explaining what happens in
> the case of non-identical CPUs but without knowing what top does I'm
> happy with either of the following diffs.
>
> I'll have a dig through the source to see if I can fin
On 25 March 2011 12:54, Jason McIntyre wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 09:44:33AM +, Glen Anderson wrote:
>>
>> "combined" is ok with me, it doesn't imply anything about how the
>> figures are reached so side-steps the issues I had earlier. In the
>> esoteric case I mentioned people will make
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 01:42:48PM +, Glen Anderson wrote:
>
> I agree that the wording in previous diffs was a bit awkward however
> using the same wording as the C, I, S and T commands suggests that CPU
> statistics will either be on or off. "Toggle the display of CPU
> statistics between th
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 09:44:33AM +, Glen Anderson wrote:
>
> "combined" is ok with me, it doesn't imply anything about how the
> figures are reached so side-steps the issues I had earlier. In the
> esoteric case I mentioned people will make their own (probably
> incorrect) assumptions with e
On 25 March 2011 09:44, Glen Anderson wrote:
> Ultimately I think there should be a note explaining what happens in
> the case of non-identical CPUs but without knowing what top does I'm
> happy with either of the following diffs.
>
> I'll have a dig through the source to see if I can find out. I'
On 25 March 2011 09:15, David Vasek wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Mar 2011, Jason McIntyre wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 06:02:15PM +, Glen Anderson wrote:
>>>
>>> I liked the idea of using an adjective when talking about the combined
>>> statistics however cumulative isn't really an accurate term
On Thu, 24 Mar 2011, Jason McIntyre wrote:
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 06:02:15PM +, Glen Anderson wrote:
I liked the idea of using an adjective when talking about the combined
statistics however cumulative isn't really an accurate term and while
ostensibly mean seems appropriate I'm unsure ho
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 06:02:15PM +, Glen Anderson wrote:
>
> I liked the idea of using an adjective when talking about the combined
> statistics however cumulative isn't really an accurate term and while
> ostensibly mean seems appropriate I'm unsure how top calculates that
> line on machine
On 24 March 2011 15:49, Jason McIntyre wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 03:32:38PM +0100, David Vasek wrote:
>> On Thu, 24 Mar 2011, Glen Anderson wrote:
>>
>> >A small change to the interactive commands section to make the
>> >description of the 1 command more accurate.
>> >
>> >$ diff -u top.1 t
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 03:32:38PM +0100, David Vasek wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Mar 2011, Glen Anderson wrote:
>
> >A small change to the interactive commands section to make the
> >description of the 1 command more accurate.
> >
> >$ diff -u top.1 top.1.new
> >--- top.1 Thu Mar 24 12:39:45 2011
>
On Thu, 24 Mar 2011, Glen Anderson wrote:
A small change to the interactive commands section to make the
description of the 1 command more accurate.
$ diff -u top.1 top.1.new
--- top.1 Thu Mar 24 12:39:45 2011
+++ top.1.new Thu Mar 24 13:10:45 2011
@@ -282,7 +282,7 @@
.Sq P
interactive
A small change to the interactive commands section to make the
description of the 1 command more accurate.
$ diff -u top.1 top.1.new
--- top.1 Thu Mar 24 12:39:45 2011
+++ top.1.new Thu Mar 24 13:10:45 2011
@@ -282,7 +282,7 @@
.Sq P
interactive command.
.It 1
-Display CPU statistics on
12 matches
Mail list logo
