Re: softraid(4)/bioctl(8) vs. non-512-byte sectors disks

2015-10-09 Thread Tobias Ulmer
On Thu, Oct 08, 2015 at 08:42:14AM -0400, Kenneth R Westerback wrote: > ... It works fine, I'm exercising 4K sr crypto with rsync every night. Commit it pretty please :) The remaining bugs don't find themselves

Re: softraid(4)/bioctl(8) vs. non-512-byte sectors disks

2015-10-08 Thread Kenneth Westerback
On 8 October 2015 at 07:13, Marcus MERIGHI wrote: > mcmer-open...@tor.at (Marcus MERIGHI), 2015.10.08 (Thu) 12:26 (CEST): >> kwesterb...@gmail.com (Kenneth Westerback), 2014.03.19 (Wed) 17:09 (CET): >> > Alas, softraid only supports 512 byte block devices at the moment. >> > Ken >> >> Any new

Re: softraid(4)/bioctl(8) vs. non-512-byte sectors disks

2015-10-08 Thread Kenneth R Westerback
On 10/08, Marcus MERIGHI wrote: > kwesterb...@gmail.com (Kenneth Westerback), 2014.03.19 (Wed) 17:09 (CET): > > Alas, softraid only supports 512 byte block devices at the moment. > > Ken > > Any news on this one? No answer as always means 'no'. > > I saw plus58.html: > * Use DEV_BSIZE inste

Re: softraid(4)/bioctl(8) vs. non-512-byte sectors disks

2015-10-08 Thread Marcus MERIGHI
mcmer-open...@tor.at (Marcus MERIGHI), 2015.10.08 (Thu) 12:26 (CEST): > kwesterb...@gmail.com (Kenneth Westerback), 2014.03.19 (Wed) 17:09 (CET): > > Alas, softraid only supports 512 byte block devices at the moment. > > Ken > > Any news on this one? No answer as always means 'no'. After re

Re: softraid(4)/bioctl(8) vs. non-512-byte sectors disks

2015-10-08 Thread Marcus MERIGHI
kwesterb...@gmail.com (Kenneth Westerback), 2014.03.19 (Wed) 17:09 (CET): > Alas, softraid only supports 512 byte block devices at the moment. > Ken Any news on this one? No answer as always means 'no'. I saw plus58.html: * Use DEV_BSIZE instead of 512 where appropriate in the kernel. This

Re: softraid(4)/bioctl(8) vs. non-512-byte sectors disks

2014-03-19 Thread Kenneth Westerback
Alas, softraid only supports 512 byte block devices at the moment. Ken On Mar 19, 2014 11:36 AM, "Marcus MERIGHI" wrote: > Reference: > ``Softraid 3TB Problems'' > http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m=136225193931620 > > Difference: > My HDDs show up as 4096 bytes/sector in dmesg. > > Short:

softraid(4)/bioctl(8) vs. non-512-byte sectors disks

2014-03-19 Thread Marcus MERIGHI
Reference: ``Softraid 3TB Problems'' http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m=136225193931620 Difference: My HDDs show up as 4096 bytes/sector in dmesg. Short: Are there any options for disks that come with 4096 bytes/sector to use with softraid(4)/bioctl(8)? Long: So I got these lovely large disks: