>> Past hissy-fits are not a predictor of future hissy-fits.
>> Nick Holland(06 Dec 2005)
Speaking of hissy-fits, see LMCCONTROL(8) for HSSI. Although that would
need the cards.
--
Ed Ahlsen-Girard, Contractor (EITC)
AFSOC/A6OK
email: edward.ahlsen-girard@hurlburt.af.mil
850-884-2414
DSN:
On 2009-09-21, sonjaya wrote:
> [snip]
> On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 5:25 PM, Paul de Weerd wrote:
>>
>> 10G/day is almost 1Mbit per second average (without encapsulation
>> overhead). Not really suitable for serial lines (or do you want to
>> bundle several 115kbit lines together for "super serial s
On Mon, 21 Sep 2009, sonjaya wrote:
yes the best options is using switch and vlan , buat is my problem in
my place no switch support vlan also no pci socket avaliable for
another ethernet card.i have try using usb to network but have poor
link.
What device did you use to "usb to network"?
dia
[snip]
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 5:25 PM, Paul de Weerd wrote:
>
> 10G/day is almost 1Mbit per second average (without encapsulation
> overhead). Not really suitable for serial lines (or do you want to
> bundle several 115kbit lines together for "super serial speed" ?). Why
> are you avoiding a dedi
[snip]
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 5:59 PM, Paul M wrote:
>
> This has nothing to do with openbsd, it's determined by your hardware.
>
> Use a cable with full handshaking. The hw can then use it if it needs to.
thank's i will create null modem with full handshaking.if that best
options for all choice
On Mon, 21 Sep 2009, Paul de Weerd wrote:
Hey Diana,
SNIP
I know about the higher speeds but i doubt the OP does. They're
focusing on cables for a job that is way more suitable for a "real"
network and (as you say) forget to mention any other relevant details.
Yeah, it's always interesting
Hey Diana,
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 06:01:01AM -0600, Diana Eichert wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Sep 2009, Paul de Weerd wrote:
> SNIP
>> overhead). Not really suitable for serial lines (or do you want to
>> bundle several 115kbit lines together for "super serial speed" ?). Why
>
> Maybe they aren't using s
On Mon, 21 Sep 2009 05:58:25 -0600 (MDT), Diana Eichert wrote
> nope, read com(4)
I did, but misread it. "...factor of 115200..."
Thanks for the correction.
-J-
On Mon, 21 Sep 2009, Paul de Weerd wrote:
SNIP
overhead). Not really suitable for serial lines (or do you want to
bundle several 115kbit lines together for "super serial speed" ?). Why
Maybe they aren't using stock UART? I've used 16750 based cards before,
read com(4) . However I can see wher
On Mon, 21 Sep 2009, Josh Grosse wrote:
SNIP
IIRC the max speed for a serial port is 115200 Kbps. 10GB would take just
under 208 hours -- more than eight days. Perhaps a network connection
would be more useful.
nope, read com(4)
diana
On 21/09/2009, at 10:12 PM, sonjaya wrote:
hi ...
i want using slip as my network interface, for cable layout what kind
recomended and working in openbsd.
i search null modem cable rs232 a have some type:
- null modem without handshaking
- null modem with loop back handshaking
- null modem
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 05:12:13PM +0700, sonjaya wrote:
[snip]
> my plan that cable will be transfer file between openbsd server ( 3
> openbsd server ) for syncronise file each server at least more than
> 10 G transfer with that cable every day.
IIRC the max speed for a serial port is 115200
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 05:12:13PM +0700, sonjaya wrote:
| hi ...
|
| i want using slip as my network interface, for cable layout what kind
| recomended and working in openbsd.
| i search null modem cable rs232 a have some type:
| - null modem without handshaking
| - null modem with loop back
hi ...
i want using slip as my network interface, for cable layout what kind
recomended and working in openbsd.
i search null modem cable rs232 a have some type:
- null modem without handshaking
- null modem with loop back handshaking
- null modem with partial handshaking
- null modem with
14 matches
Mail list logo