On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 11:06 AM, Tom Murphy wrote:
>I get these from time to time on my Soekris net5501 too. A reboot seems
> to fix the problem. It is not dying hardware. If it was, I wouldn't
> continue to
> use the machine.
Yes... rebooting the machine three times didn't help. But powerin
had in the past random ohci scheduling
> overruns, resulting in an unusable rum(4). But ifconfig down/up solves
> the problem.
>
> Now I have a lot of ohci scheduling overruns just after boot and my
> rum(4) isn't usable. Here is a dmesg:
Jacob & Mattieu,
I get th
m ohci scheduling
> overruns, resulting in an unusable rum(4). But ifconfig down/up solves
> the problem.
>
> Now I have a lot of ohci scheduling overruns just after boot and my
> rum(4) isn't usable. Here is a dmesg:
>
>
> OpenBSD 4.8-current (GENERIC) #507: Wed Dec 1 22
Hi all,
I decided to upgrade my soekris net5501 (from a snapshot around
september 7) to -current. I had in the past random ohci scheduling
overruns, resulting in an unusable rum(4). But ifconfig down/up solves
the problem.
Now I have a lot of ohci scheduling overruns just after boot and my
rum(4
On Tue, Mar 04, 2008 at 10:23:47AM +0100, giovanni wrote:
> Chipset: Ralink RT2501USB. (RT2528+RT2571W)
>
> rum0 at uhub0 port 1 "Ralink 802.11 bg WLAN" rev 2.00/0.01 addr 3
> rum0: MAC/BBP RT2573 (rev 0x2573a), RF RT2528, address 00:0e:e8:e0:c
Chipset: Ralink RT2501USB. (RT2528+RT2571W)
rum0 at uhub0 port 1 "Ralink 802.11 bg WLAN" rev 2.00/0.01 addr 3
rum0: MAC/BBP RT2573 (rev 0x2573a), RF RT2528, address 00:0e:e8:e0:c4:17
Index: rum.4
===
RCS file: /cvs/src
On Wed, 2 Aug 2006, Jonathan Franks wrote:
>
> On Aug 2, 2006, at 7:51 PM, Diana Eichert wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 2 Aug 2006, NetNeanderthal wrote:
SNIP
> >> It sounds fascinating -- do keep us updated on how OpenBSD
> >> fits your application.
> >
> > What ever I can talk about I do.
> >
>
> How spec
On Aug 2, 2006, at 7:51 PM, Diana Eichert wrote:
On Wed, 2 Aug 2006, NetNeanderthal wrote:
On 8/2/06, Diana Eichert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We like to do things with commodity
hardware, well let's just say that are "interesting", right now
we want to
push wireless across a "desert", with
On Wed, 2 Aug 2006, NetNeanderthal wrote:
> On 8/2/06, Diana Eichert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > We like to do things with commodity
> > hardware, well let's just say that are "interesting", right now we want to
> > push wireless across a "desert", with gear we don't care about losing.
>
> It so
On 8/2/06, Diana Eichert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We like to do things with commodity
hardware, well let's just say that are "interesting", right now we want to
push wireless across a "desert", with gear we don't care about losing.
It sounds fascinating -- do keep us updated on how OpenBSD
fi
> I focus the radio signal minimimizing other radios seeing the signal
> from the sides.
I use an(4)'s antenna diversity to similar effect. Either way, good ears
need less signal.
On Wed, 2 Aug 2006, NetNeanderthal wrote:
> On 8/2/06, Diana Eichert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Thank you for your concerns, but I can honestly say I have access to some
> > of the best machine tools in the world.
>
> You're welcome, and I've blessed every last soothsayer's soul that has
> tol
On 8/2/06, Diana Eichert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thank you for your concerns, but I can honestly say I have access to some
of the best machine tools in the world.
You're welcome, and I've blessed every last soothsayer's soul that has
told me exactly that! Nevertheless, I suppose your ... r
On Wed, 2 Aug 2006, NetNeanderthal wrote:
chuckle
> A bit off-topic from misc@, but you might consider purchasing a
> professional-grade antenna. I believe that pacwireless.com sells most
> in the 2.4GHz range at or under $65 USD that will more than suffice (I
> am unaffiliated). I advise again
On 8/2/06, Diana Eichert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, 1 Aug 2006, pedro la peu wrote:
> If that combination is necessary a ralink radio is likely a poor choice.
I could do it with bi-quads only on either end but by using the parabolic
I focus the radio signal minimimizing other radios seei
On Tue, 1 Aug 2006, pedro la peu wrote:
> On Tuesday 01 August 2006 13:01, Diana Eichert wrote:
>
> > I want to put a bi-quad at the focal point of an 18" parabolic dish at
> > either end.
>
> If that combination is necessary a ralink radio is likely a poor choice.
I could do it with bi-quads onl
On Tuesday 01 August 2006 13:01, Diana Eichert wrote:
> I want to put a bi-quad at the focal point of an 18" parabolic dish at
> either end.
If that combination is necessary a ralink radio is likely a poor choice.
On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 06:01:40AM -0600, Diana Eichert wrote:
> On Tue, 1 Aug 2006, Jonathan Gray wrote:
> SNIP
> > rx and tx are not yet working, if you want a USB device that can
> > act as an AP now look at the hardware list for ural(4) but be
> > careful as some vendors have replaced chips wit
On Tue, 1 Aug 2006, Jonathan Gray wrote:
SNIP
> rx and tx are not yet working, if you want a USB device that can
> act as an AP now look at the hardware list for ural(4) but be
> careful as some vendors have replaced chips with the second
> gen ones rum intends to support and not changed part numbe
On Mon, Jul 31, 2006 at 11:40:43AM -0600, Diana Eichert wrote:
> First I realize rum(4) is a work in progress, but I've seen some commits
> related to the newer Ralink USB wireless chipset using the RT2501.
> Reading the rum(4) man page it appears it will support configuring as a
First I realize rum(4) is a work in progress, but I've seen some commits
related to the newer Ralink USB wireless chipset using the RT2501.
Reading the rum(4) man page it appears it will support configuring as an
AP. I was thinking about getting one to see how it works.
Anyone working with
21 matches
Mail list logo
