Re: nroff

On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 16:52:17 +0200, Friedrich Locke wrote: > i have installed openbsd 4.9 and i am trying to compile ucspi-tcp-0.88 > with a ssl patch, but the compilation process fails due to not finding > a program called nroff. > > Previous version of OpenBSD seems to have

Re: nroff

On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 11:52:17 -0300 Friedrich Locke wrote: > Previous version of OpenBSD seems to have installed nroff. Does > anybody knows why it was removed? > How could i install it? I think it wasn't needed for the man pages anymore. It is in ports, groff, I think. A search fo

Re: nroff

pkg_add groff On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 10:52 AM, Friedrich Locke wrote: > Hi folks, > > i have installed openbsd 4.9 and i am trying to compile ucspi-tcp-0.88 > with a ssl patch, but the compilation process fails due to not finding > a program called nroff. > > Previous ver

nroff

Hi folks, i have installed openbsd 4.9 and i am trying to compile ucspi-tcp-0.88 with a ssl patch, but the compilation process fails due to not finding a program called nroff. Previous version of OpenBSD seems to have installed nroff. Does anybody knows why it was removed? How could i install it

Re: perldoc manpage error or nroff change?

Hi Chris, Chris Bennett wrote on Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 06:19:49AM -0500: >>SPACE_TO_UNDERSUser(Contributed Perl DocumeSPACEoTO_UNDERSCORE(1) [...] > OK, maybe "very ugly and wrong" is a bit harsh, but perldoc used to make > those ugly titles Right, and even groff-1.20.1 still did that, last t

Re: perldoc manpage error or nroff change?

>SPACE_TO_UNDERSUser(Contributed Perl DocumeSPACEoTO_UNDERSCORE(1) > - A few blank line differences, because mandoc handles blank lines >in man(7) headers and footers like groff-1.20, not like 1.15. > - Mandoc doesn't put an additional header/footer pair in the middle >of the page. >

Re: perldoc manpage error or nroff change?

Hi Chris, Chris Bennett wrote on Tue, Nov 02, 2010 at 08:26:01PM -0500: > Older system with October 30 snapshot. > Since there was a delay with snapshot packages, > I built some ports while waiting, so I added groff. > $ which nroff > /usr/bin/nroff Aha, you didn't remov

Re: perldoc manpage error or nroff change?

programs, so even if you > have deleted some, others may still be there. > > Here are a few commands that help finding out the state of > your system: > > $ which nroff # tells you whether you have groff in base, > $ which nroff /usr/bin/nroff # in

Re: perldoc manpage error or nroff change?

rldoc manpage says perldoc is equivalent to: > pod2man script.pl | nroff -man | $PAGER > > but that produces a very ugly and wrong output. > > Is the perldoc manpage in error or has nroff been changed? Unfortunately, you are not saying how you set up the system showing these sympto

Re: perldoc manpage error or nroff change?

AFAIK nroff's gone from base too in addition to groff. I had to install groff from ports for cmake and I see a nroff in /usr/local/bin. you might have to install groff from ports to get that nroff. On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 4:17 PM, Chris Bennett wrote: > Interested in the new mandoc ch

perldoc manpage error or nroff change?

Interested in the new mandoc changes, I was looking at a perl script I have with pod in it. perldoc script.pl produces a good output. perldoc manpage says perldoc is equivalent to: pod2man script.pl | nroff -man | $PAGER but that produces a very ugly and wrong output. Is the perldoc manpage

Re: nroff -mandoc alternative

Christian Weisgerber wrote: > Kristaps DE>onsons wrote: > >> Hello, if anybody's interested in an alternative to groff for viewing >> BSD "mdoc" manual pages, I'm actively looking for patches and problem >> reports for mdocml. From the site : > > Does this also handle man

Re: nroff -mandoc alternative

On Sun, Mar 01, 2009 at 03:22:33PM +, Christian Weisgerber wrote: > Kristaps DE>onsons wrote: > > > Hello, if anybody's interested in an alternative to groff for viewing > > BSD "mdoc" manual pages, I'm actively looking for patches and problem > > reports for mdocml. From the site

Re: nroff -mandoc alternative

Kristaps DE>onsons wrote: > Hello, if anybody's interested in an alternative to groff for viewing > BSD "mdoc" manual pages, I'm actively looking for patches and problem > reports for mdocml. From the site : Does this also handle man(7) or only mdoc(7)? -- Christian "na

Re: nroff -mandoc alternative

On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 11:01:49PM +0100, Kristaps D??onsons wrote: > Hello, if anybody's interested in an alternative to groff for viewing > BSD "mdoc" manual pages, I'm actively looking for patches and problem > reports for mdocml. From the site : Excellent! Was this pro

Re: nroff -mandoc alternative

Matthew Szudzik wrote: Hello, if anybody's interested in an alternative to groff for viewing BSD "mdoc" manual pages, I'm actively looking for patches and problem reports for mdocml. From the site : Excellent! Was this project started in response to the discussion about

nroff -mandoc alternative

Hello, if anybody's interested in an alternative to groff for viewing BSD "mdoc" manual pages, I'm actively looking for patches and problem reports for mdocml. From the site : "mdocml is a suite of tools compiling `mdoc', the roff macro package for BSD manual pages. The mi