> 17.12.2024 15:01 CET Kirill A. Korinsky napisał(a):
>
>
> On Tue, 17 Dec 2024 12:02:40 +0100,
> Michał wrote:
> >
> > > Things that could work, but don't:
> > > Webcam, Suspend
> >
> > Webcam not working in a strange way - no video and after awhile it
hangs system
> > (7.6-current (GENERIC
On Tue, 17 Dec 2024 19:26:20 +0100,
Michał wrote:
>
> > 17.12.2024 15:01 CET Kirill A. Korinsky napisał(a):
> >
> >
> > On Tue, 17 Dec 2024 12:02:40 +0100,
> > Michał wrote:
> > >
> > > > Things that could work, but don't:
> > > > Webcam, Suspend
> > >
> > > Webcam not working in a strange
> 17.12.2024 15:01 CET Kirill A. Korinsky napisał(a):
>
>
> On Tue, 17 Dec 2024 12:02:40 +0100,
> Michał wrote:
> >
> > > Things that could work, but don't:
> > > Webcam, Suspend
> >
> > Webcam not working in a strange way - no video and after awhile it hangs
> > system
> > (7.6-current (GE
On Tue, 17 Dec 2024 12:02:40 +0100,
Michał wrote:
>
> > Things that could work, but don't:
> > Webcam, Suspend
>
> Webcam not working in a strange way - no video and after awhile it hangs
> system
> (7.6-current (GENERIC.MP) #480: Sat Dec 14 18:12:05 MST 2024)
>
It's intriguing. A while, it's
> 13.12.2024 23:54 CET Stefan Hagen napisał(a):
>
>
> Michał wrote (2024-11-06 14:16 CET):
> > Which hardware is better supported (as a whole):
> > 1. System based on Ryzen
> > - AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U,
> > - AMD Radeon 780M,
> > - Ethernet RTL8111EPV,
> 13.12.2024 23:54 CET Stefan Hagen napisał(a):
>
>
> Michał wrote (2024-11-06 14:16 CET):
> > Which hardware is better supported (as a whole):
> > 1. System based on Ryzen
> > - AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U,
> > - AMD Radeon 780M,
> > - Ethernet RTL8111EPV,
Kirill A. Korinsky wrote (2024-12-15 02:29 CET):
> On Sat, 14 Dec 2024 16:47:12 +0100,
> Stefan Hagen wrote:
> >
> > Kirill A. Korinsky wrote (2024-12-14 12:39 CET):
> > > Here a blind shot. Future debug requires uvideo_debug = 2 which very
> > > noise.
> >
> > Cool, thank you! Unfortunately it d
On Sat, 14 Dec 2024 16:47:12 +0100,
Stefan Hagen wrote:
>
> Kirill A. Korinsky wrote (2024-12-14 12:39 CET):
> > Here a blind shot. Future debug requires uvideo_debug = 2 which very noise.
>
> Cool, thank you! Unfortunately it doesn't change much.
>
> Below is a dmesg with uvideo_debug = 2 while I
Kirill A. Korinsky wrote (2024-12-14 12:39 CET):
> Here a blind shot. Future debug requires uvideo_debug = 2 which very noise.
Cool, thank you! Unfortunately it doesn't change much.
Below is a dmesg with uvideo_debug = 2 while I was running:
Once:
$ video -f /dev/video0
And then twice:
$ ffplay
On Sat, 14 Dec 2024 09:06:15 +0100,
Stefan Hagen wrote:
>
> Kirill A. Korinsky wrote (2024-12-14 00:46 CET):
> > On Fri, 13 Dec 2024 23:54:31 +0100,
> > Stefan Hagen wrote:
> > > $ ffplay -f v4l2 -list_formats all -i /dev/video0
> > > [video4linux2,v4l2 @ 0x854a377c400] Compressed: mjpeg :
Kirill A. Korinsky wrote (2024-12-14 00:46 CET):
> On Fri, 13 Dec 2024 23:54:31 +0100,
> Stefan Hagen wrote:
> > $ ffplay -f v4l2 -list_formats all -i /dev/video0
> > [video4linux2,v4l2 @ 0x854a377c400] Compressed: mjpeg :
> > MJPEG : 1280x720 640x360 640x480 848x480 960x540
On Fri, 13 Dec 2024 23:54:31 +0100,
Stefan Hagen wrote:
>
> Webcam:
>
> In theory the webcam is supported and responsive:
>
> $ ffplay -f v4l2 -list_formats all -i /dev/video0
> [video4linux2,v4l2 @ 0x854a377c400] Compressed: mjpeg :
> MJPEG : 1280x720 640x360 640x480 848x
Michał wrote (2024-11-06 14:16 CET):
> Which hardware is better supported (as a whole):
> 1. System based on Ryzen
> - AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U,
> - AMD Radeon 780M,
> - Ethernet RTL8111EPV,
> - Wifi Qualcomm® Wi-Fi® 6E NFA725A or NCM825 (don't know if i can choose
> whi
ssd.
>>>
>>> But the information about support of such new model
>>> is almost non existent. I'm lost as i can find information about
>>> intel being more supported, but on the other hand,
>>> i find more dmesg's for previous generation of T1
; is almost non existent. I'm lost as i can find information about
>> intel being more supported, but on the other hand,
>> i find more dmesg's for previous generation of T14 with Ryzen.
>> I found info about AX211 being supported.
>>
>> So the questio
gt;
> But the information about support of such new model
> is almost non existent. I'm lost as i can find information about
> intel being more supported, but on the other hand,
> i find more dmesg's for previous generation of T14 with Ryzen.
> I found info about AX211 be
info about AX211 being supported.
So the question to the list:
Which hardware is better supported (as a whole):
1. System based on Ryzen
- AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U,
- AMD Radeon 780M,
- Ethernet RTL8111EPV,
- Wifi Qualcomm® Wi-Fi® 6E NFA725A or NCM825 (don't know if i can choose which)
2.
bout AX211 being supported.
So the question to the list:
Which hardware is better supported (as a whole):
1. System based on Ryzen
- AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U,
- AMD Radeon 780M,
- Ethernet RTL8111EPV,
- Wifi Qualcomm® Wi-Fi® 6E NFA725A or NCM825 (don't know if i can choose which)
2. System
the date pass 2020, I ONLY buy hardware that support CoreBoot now and
never look back.
You have a series of possible model to choose from. Real cheap if that's
what you want of way more powerful if that's what you need. Even some
with SFP if you need that.
I used the VP2420 for a fe
h. I've
>> never dealt with anything faster than gigabit, is there a "best" 10 gigabit
>> chipset for OpenBSD that supports all the hardware offloading features and
>> whatever multi-process functionality is already implemented?
>>
>> Something small an
firewall/router that can do the packet
> filtering and some VLAN and routing without having to worry about
> adding too much. I've never dealt with anything faster than gigabit,
> is there a "best" 10 gigabit chipset for OpenBSD that supports all
> the hardware offl
you running on it?
> My goal is an OpenBSD firewall/router that can do the packet filtering and
> some VLAN and routing without having to worry about adding too much. I've
> never dealt with anything faster than gigabit, is there a "best" 10 gigabit
> chipset for OpenBSD
having to worry about adding too much. I've
never dealt with anything faster than gigabit, is there a "best" 10 gigabit
chipset for OpenBSD that supports all the hardware offloading features and
whatever multi-process functionality is already implemented?
Something small and stand-alon
Thanks a lot to you all for these recommendations.
Дана 24/05/08 02:37PM, Karsten Pedersen написа:
> [...] The C program can be as simple as compiling "Hello World" to exhibit the
> issue. Takes about 15 seconds to compile "Hello World". [...]
On a Lenovo IdeaPad 3-15IGL05 81WQ[1] laptop:
$ time sh -c "printf '#include \\nint main() { puts(\"Hell
on them in the last email
> Might be, but you didn't checked by tests. Yes, of course you have to
> use the same "C program" as before.
I tested against different operating systems and different hardware. As
mentioned there
is definitely something up with this combo but I haven
7;t present with Linux or FreeBSD.
>
> It was ~£30 and completely fanless, so will almost be the perfect hardware
> for a home server once
> these issues can be resolved.
>
> In short, the M710q with Intel processor might be the better choice. I
> suspect it is to do with the
>
g?
> It was ~ Ł30 and completely fanless, so will almost be the perfect hardware
> for a home server once these issues can be resolved.
What issues?
> In short, the M710q with Intel processor might be the better choice.
Might be, but you didn't checked by tests. Yes, of course you
figure out why. Interestingly,
even on apm -H it takes
longer to compile a C program than a Raspberry Pi 3. It also takes 14 Watts so
the power management
isn't quite there yet. These issues aren't present with Linux or FreeBSD.
It was ~£30 and completely fanless, so will almost be the perfect ha
Second-hand Lenovo M710q tiny with a wifi-card could also work:
https://dmesgd.nycbug.org/index.cgi?do=view&id=5296
Jan Stary írta 2024. máj.. 7, K-n 08:47 órakor:
> On May 06 21:03:17, mytraddr...@gmail.com wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> can anyone please advise on what computer I can purchase with the
On May 06 21:03:17, mytraddr...@gmail.com wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> can anyone please advise on what computer I can purchase with the following
> requirements:
>
> - fully supports OpenBSD
> - no noise
> - good quality wifi
> - small form factor preferably
> - processor does not need to be fast (no h
Thanks!
> James
The recommendation on the OpenBSD Router Guide site works really well:
https://openbsdrouterguide.net/#the-hardware
There are several different models.
On Mon, May 06, 2024 at 09:03:17PM +0100, James Johnson wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> can anyone please advise on what computer I can purchase with the following
> requirements:
>
> - fully supports OpenBSD
> - no noise
> - good quality wifi
> - small form factor preferably
> - processor does not need
I recently switched my RockPro64 over to OpenBSD and so far everything works
nicely with it. I had trouble getting it to boot at first, but it was my fault
for not fully reading the installation instructions[1], and assuming that I
could simply `dd` the provided miniroot75.img to an SD card and
For various values of 'fully supports', I have multiple odroid HC4 units, and
they all run very well. I've booted them with OpenBSD to play with it, but
inevitably switched back to Linux. No built-in WiFi, but it has a single USB
socket that you could plug in a WiFi/Bluetooth dongle.
-JD.
>
Hi all,
can anyone please advise on what computer I can purchase with the following
requirements:
- fully supports OpenBSD
- no noise
- good quality wifi
- small form factor preferably
- processor does not need to be fast (no highly intensive compute load)
- low RAM need
- needs 1 TB of hard dri
On Tue, Mar 26, 2024 at 1:07 AM Jose Maldonado wrote:
>
> El Mon, 25 Mar 2024 04:39:15 -0400
> Steve Litt escribió:
> > Does anyone know whether this hardware runs OpenBSD?
> >
> > https://www.walmart.com/ip/MeLE-Quieter3Q-Fanless-Mini-PC-N5105-Windows-11-8GB-256GB
El Mon, 25 Mar 2024 04:39:15 -0400
Steve Litt escribió:
> Does anyone know whether this hardware runs OpenBSD?
>
> https://www.walmart.com/ip/MeLE-Quieter3Q-Fanless-Mini-PC-N5105-Windows-11-8GB-256GB-4K-UHD-Wifi-6-Mini-Desktop-Computer-New/2177929669
>
> Thanks,
>
> S
On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 04:39:15AM -0400, Steve Litt wrote:
> Does anyone know whether this hardware runs OpenBSD?
>
> https://www.walmart.com/ip/MeLE-Quieter3Q-Fanless-Mini-PC-N5105-Windows-11-8GB-256GB-4K-UHD-Wifi-6-Mini-Desktop-Computer-New/2177929669
>
> Thanks,
>
>
On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 11:41 AM Steve Litt
wrote:
> Does anyone know whether this hardware runs OpenBSD?
>
>
> https://www.walmart.com/ip/MeLE-Quieter3Q-Fanless-Mini-PC-N5105-Windows-11-8GB-256GB-4K-UHD-Wifi-6-Mini-Desktop-Computer-New/2177929669
>
> Thanks,
>
> SteveT
Steve Litt writes:
> Does anyone know whether this hardware runs OpenBSD?
>
> https://www.walmart.com/ip/MeLE-Quieter3Q-Fanless-Mini-PC-N5105-Windows-11-8GB-256GB-4K-UHD-Wifi-6-Mini-Desktop-Computer-New/2177929669
Maybe... Looking at:
https://www.cnx-software.com/2022/06/03/mele-
Does anyone know whether this hardware runs OpenBSD?
https://www.walmart.com/ip/MeLE-Quieter3Q-Fanless-Mini-PC-N5105-Windows-11-8GB-256GB-4K-UHD-Wifi-6-Mini-Desktop-Computer-New/2177929669
Thanks,
SteveT
Steve Litt
Autumn 2023 featured book: Rapid Learning for the 21st Century
http
hello
I have problem while running program i2pd and increasing bandwidth/number of
tunnels, router fails and internet connectivity network-wide goes down, router
restarts it after a few seconds up to minutes
someone told me this:
> For an ISP "customer premises equipment" router (home/officr rout
Hello!
Please advise me hardware for an OpenBSD firewall:
- 8 gigabit ethernet interfaces,
- >= 4 Gbps throughput.
Thanks,
Alexei
> Hi, anyone using keepassxc-2.7.4p2 with a hardware dongle - preferably
> opensource or DIY type - succesfully in OpenBSD?
I have used ordinary USB storage, and 'pash' in the past:
https://github.com/dylanaraps/pash#readme
It does not sound as solid as what you're look
--- Original Message ---
On Monday, October 2nd, 2023 at 5:18 PM, Mike Coddington
wrote:
>
> > On Oct 2, 2023, at 2:09 PM, m...@phosphorus.com.br wrote:
> >
> > ping
> >
> > On 9/30/23 07:39, m...@phosphorus.com.br wrote:
> >
> > > Hi
I don't think the keepassxc-2.7.4p2 package will support any hardware keys.
There is a -yubikey flavour (i.e. the keepassxc-2.7.4p2-yubikey package) which
might work with a yubikey. Never tried it though.
On 2023-10-02, Mike Coddington wrote:
>
>
>> On Oct 2, 20
> On Oct 2, 2023, at 2:09 PM, m...@phosphorus.com.br wrote:
>
> ping
>
> On 9/30/23 07:39, m...@phosphorus.com.br wrote:
>> Hi, anyone using keepassxc-2.7.4p2 with a hardware dongle - preferably
>> opensource or DIY type - succesfully in OpenBSD?
>>
>>
ping
On 9/30/23 07:39, m...@phosphorus.com.br wrote:
Hi, anyone using keepassxc-2.7.4p2 with a hardware dongle - preferably
opensource or DIY type - succesfully in OpenBSD?
--
Fabio
Hi, anyone using keepassxc-2.7.4p2 with a hardware dongle - preferably
opensource or DIY type - succesfully in OpenBSD?
--
Fabio
g gre/ipsec to sec(4) could
make positive difference in throughput on same hardware?
> - pick faster crypto algorithms
I posted mine above, I would be thankful to get latest recommendation.
> - try wireguard?
I am testing replacing a few of gre/ipsec with wg interfaces on 7.3 at
the moment. Ma
On 2023-08-29, myml...@gmx.com wrote:
> My question is there any recent documentation / information on setting
> up an openssh server with non-hardware based two factor authentication?
> This does NOT have to be google authenticator, any similar service will
> suffice.
if an ssh
On 2023-08-29, Daniel Jakots wrote:
> You can also want to look at sysutils/login_oath (which I've been using
> for years), but maybe for new setups, the login_totp from base makes
> more sense.
you might be thinking of login_yubikey which is in base, but it has no
way to sync the counter between
On Tue, 29 Aug 2023 13:18:53 -0400, Dave Voutila wrote:
> > You can also want to look at sysutils/login_oath (which I've been
> > using for years), but maybe for new setups, the login_totp from
> > base makes more sense.
> >
>
> login_totp is in base?
Wow, I was sure https://github.com/reyk/l
Daniel Jakots writes:
> On Tue, 29 Aug 2023 10:07:18 -0500, "myml...@gmx.com"
> wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I want to secure an openssh server with two factor authentication and
>> have seen the hardware token methods, most recently i've been se
On Tue, 29 Aug 2023 10:07:18 -0500, "myml...@gmx.com"
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I want to secure an openssh server with two factor authentication and
> have seen the hardware token methods, most recently i've been seeing
> yubi/FIDO methods.
>
> Ideally I would
Hi All,
I want to secure an openssh server with two factor authentication and
have seen the hardware token methods, most recently i've been seeing
yubi/FIDO methods.
Ideally I would like to avoid having to depend on a usb size device that
could easily be lost.
I looked around and found me
CPU E5-2623 v4 @
> 2.60GHz and bge NICs, and it seems it can push no more than 200Mbit/s
> of ipsec bidirectionally (I have no chance to test this thoroughly in a
> lab, but what I see in production indicate this strongly).
>
> Are there any commands I can run which would indicate i
r the server and doing some tests that way.
If you post your IPsec configuration, perhaps someone can suggest
whether the choice of ciphers etc could be improved. It can make quite a
difference.
> Are there any commands I can run which would indicate ipsec traffic is
> being throttled due t
On Fri, Aug 11, 2023 at 01:08:07PM +0200, Marko Cupać said:
Are there any commands I can run which would indicate ipsec traffic is
being throttled due to hardware being underspecced? top shows CPU is
more than 50% idle. netstat shows ~1 Ierrs / Ifail (no Oerrs /
Ifail) on interfaces that
o chance to test this thoroughly in a
lab, but what I see in production indicate this strongly).
Are there any commands I can run which would indicate ipsec traffic is
being throttled due to hardware being underspecced? top shows CPU is
more than 50% idle. netstat shows ~1 Ierrs / Ifail (no Oe
On 7/3/23 12:59, Rachel Roth wrote:
For the record, "API not working" is not exclusively about mediaopt
settings. "API not working" also kills SFP DOM stats, something which
is quite useful when troubleshooting with third-parties on the other
side of your fibre link.
When someone on the othe
2 Jul 2023, 22:58 by z...@philomathiclife.com:
> As a result, there is not much to "negotiate"
> anyway. In summary if 10GSFP+Cu is acceptable, then you shouldn't worry
> about the API not working on OpenBSD.
>
For the record, "API not working" is not exclusively about mediaopt settings.
"
On 7/1/23 18:26, Zack Newman wrote:
As Rachel pointed out, OpenBSD 7.3 does not work with the API of that
NIC when the newest firmware is flashed. Not sure what the most recent
version of firmware that has a working API is, but it is not a problem
for me since autonegotiation works just fine. If
I don't have any 10 Gbps NICs, so I cannot comment on that level of
throughput. I do have a couple 2.5 Gbps machines, and my system
saturates them with ease. No way to know if there is 7.5 Gbps more I
could get out of them without actually testing it.
Motherboard: Supermicro X13SAE flashed with n
ill be close to saturated, along with the downlink to our
> switches. The other two will only need to carry ~1Gb/s of traffic.
>
> We are pretty much a Supermicro shop, and I'm wondering if anyone
> out there is running a similar setup on SM hardware. My main concern
> is finding
aturated, along with the downlink to our
> switches. The other two will only need to carry ~1Gb/s of traffic.
>
> We are pretty much a Supermicro shop, and I'm wondering if anyone
> out there is running a similar setup on SM hardware. My main concern
> is finding NICs that wil
only need to carry ~1Gb/s of traffic.
We are pretty much a Supermicro shop, and I'm wondering if anyone
out there is running a similar setup on SM hardware. My main concern
is finding NICs that will let us squeeze every last drop of bandwidth
on the 10gig links.
I did run some brief ttcp
On 2023-06-20, Nick Holland wrote:
> On 6/20/23 13:13, Karel Lucas wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'm going to create a firewall with openBSD, and would like to use the
>> ARM64 or ARMv7 distribution for that. Unfortunately I don't know what
>> hardw
On 6/20/23 13:13, Karel Lucas wrote:
Hi all,
I'm going to create a firewall with openBSD, and would like to use the
ARM64 or ARMv7 distribution for that. Unfortunately I don't know what
hardware I can get for this, and that's the reason for this mail. Can
someone point m
Hi all,
I'm going to create a firewall with openBSD, and would like to use the
ARM64 or ARMv7 distribution for that. Unfortunately I don't know what
hardware I can get for this, and that's the reason for this mail. Can
someone point me to a suitable platform for this? If this
That's been my motto as well.
Except I recently picked up an R86s with older Mellanox ConnectX-3 10GbE
SFPs, only to discover that OpenBSD only supports the newer ConnectX-4
and 5s :(
I'd love to contribute in writing a driver in some way, but don't even
know where to begin.
On 4/28/23 13:
Gustavo Rios wrote:
> What is the best supported servers by OpenBSD ?
The older, the better!
Take the oldest machine that will suit your needs.
If it old enough, then someone:
o released some (in)complete documentation
o was pissed enough to start writing drivers and code for it
o noticed bugs a
3 12:20
To: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: hardware
Attention : courriel externe | external email
On 4/20/23 17:12, Katherine Mcmillan wrote:
> According to ChatGPT, unfortunately, it doesn't work on plants.
>
> Me to ChatGPT: Can I run OpenBSD on my ficus?
>
> ChatGPT: No, it is
On 4/20/23 17:12, Katherine Mcmillan wrote:
According to ChatGPT, unfortunately, it doesn't work on plants.
Me to ChatGPT: Can I run OpenBSD on my ficus?
ChatGPT: No, it is not possible to run OpenBSD on a ficus plant. OpenBSD is an
operating system designed to run on computer hardware
According to ChatGPT, unfortunately, it doesn't work on plants.
Me to ChatGPT: Can I run OpenBSD on my ficus?
ChatGPT: No, it is not possible to run OpenBSD on a ficus plant. OpenBSD is an
operating system designed to run on computer hardware, not on plants. Plants do
not have the nece
Did you not know NetBSD runs on everything and OpenBSD runs on every fur!
Op wo 19 apr. 2023 10:53 schreef Stanislav Syekirin <
stanislav.syeki...@studium.fernuni-hagen.de>:
>
>
>
> On Mi, 19 Apr 2023 12:51:02 +1000
> David Diggles wrote:
> > On 2023-04-19 01:40, folly bololey wrote:
> >>> It
and lest we forget, all the gray/grey ones
On April 19, 2023 2:19:48 AM MDT, Jan Stary wrote:
>Once we leveraged the synergy of the red and purple solution frameworks.
>
>On Apr 18 07:47:56, deich...@placebonol.com wrote:
>> I was always partial to the blue or purple ones.
>>
>> On April 18, 20
Once we leveraged the synergy of the red and purple solution frameworks.
On Apr 18 07:47:56, deich...@placebonol.com wrote:
> I was always partial to the blue or purple ones.
>
> On April 18, 2023 3:42:58 AM MDT, Joel Carnat wrote:
> >
> >> Le 18 avr. 2023 à 11:30, Stuart Henderson a
> >> écri
On Mi, 19 Apr 2023 12:51:02 +1000
David Diggles wrote:
On 2023-04-19 01:40, folly bololey wrote:
It doesn't matter whether the cat is black or white, as long as it
catches mice.
Black cat is more stealthy
just a different hunting strategy and depends on the lighting. white
cats would b
On 2023-04-19 01:40, folly bololey wrote:
It doesn't matter whether the cat is black or white, as long as it
catches mice.
Black cat is more stealthy
just a different hunting strategy and depends on the lighting. white
cats would be stealthier in snow, or ambushing from above in the day
time
> It doesn't matter whether the cat is black or white, as long as it
> catches mice.
Black cat is more stealthy
I was always partial to the blue or purple ones.
On April 18, 2023 3:42:58 AM MDT, Joel Carnat wrote:
>
>> Le 18 avr. 2023 à 11:30, Stuart Henderson a
>> écrit :
>>
>> On 2023-04-18, Mischa wrote:
On 2023-04-17 23:37, Mike Larkin wrote:
On Mon, Apr 17, 2023 at 02:21:14PM -0600, The
On Mon, 2023-04-17 at 21:37 +, Mike Larkin wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 17, 2023 at 02:21:14PM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> > Gustavo Rios wrote:
> >
> > > What is the best supported servers by OpenBSD ?
> >
> > The silver ones work a little bit better than the black ones.
> >
>
> disagree. All m
> Le 18 avr. 2023 à 11:30, Stuart Henderson a écrit
> :
>
> On 2023-04-18, Mischa wrote:
>>> On 2023-04-17 23:37, Mike Larkin wrote:
>>> On Mon, Apr 17, 2023 at 02:21:14PM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
Gustavo Rios wrote:
> What is the best supported servers by OpenBSD ?
Sure, the cobalt and electric blue ones are great. But also the dark red, green
and dark blue ones. The silver / white ones are great to, specially if you need
them in a modern or home office.
> Am 18.04.2023 um 11:30 schrieb Stuart Henderson :
>
> On 2023-04-18, Mischa wrote:
>>> On 2023-04-
On 2023-04-18, Mischa wrote:
> On 2023-04-17 23:37, Mike Larkin wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 17, 2023 at 02:21:14PM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
>>> Gustavo Rios wrote:
>>>
>>> > What is the best supported servers by OpenBSD ?
>>>
>>> The silver ones work a little bit better than the black ones.
>>>
>
On 2023-04-17 23:37, Mike Larkin wrote:
On Mon, Apr 17, 2023 at 02:21:14PM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
Gustavo Rios wrote:
> What is the best supported servers by OpenBSD ?
The silver ones work a little bit better than the black ones.
disagree. All my long running servers are the black one
On Mon, Apr 17, 2023 at 02:21:14PM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> Gustavo Rios wrote:
>
> > What is the best supported servers by OpenBSD ?
>
> The silver ones work a little bit better than the black ones.
>
disagree. All my long running servers are the black ones.
On Mon, 2023-04-17 at 14:21 -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> Gustavo Rios wrote:
>
> > What is the best supported servers by OpenBSD ?
>
> The silver ones work a little bit better than the black ones.
If you can get one of the more rare red ones, they're faster!
--
A Kiwi in Australia,
doing my
Gustavo Rios wrote:
> What is the best supported servers by OpenBSD ?
The silver ones work a little bit better than the black ones.
What is the best supported servers by OpenBSD ?
Dell, HPE, IBM or Oracle's ones ?
Thanks.
--
The lion and the tiger may be more powerful, but the wolves do not perform
in the circus
Greg Steuck wrote:
> rsyk...@disroot.org writes:
>
> > Fabio Martins wrote:
> >> About your question, I believe you need to do a tail -f /var/log/messages
> >
> > this is what I see after pluging the key in the computer:
> >
> > Apr 7 19:02:06 odin /bsd: uhidev1 at uhub0 port 1 configuration 1
rsyk...@disroot.org writes:
> Fabio Martins wrote:
>> About your question, I believe you need to do a tail -f /var/log/messages
>
> this is what I see after pluging the key in the computer:
>
> Apr 7 19:02:06 odin /bsd: uhidev1 at uhub0 port 1 configuration 1 interface
> 1 "GoTrust Idem Key" re
Fabio Martins wrote:
> About your question, I believe you need to do a tail -f /var/log/messages
this is what I see after pluging the key in the computer:
Apr 7 19:02:06 odin /bsd: uhidev1 at uhub0 port 1 configuration 1 interface 1
"GoTrust Idem Key" rev 2.00/1.11 addr 2
Apr 7 19:02:06 odin
7, 2023, wrote:
> Dear list,
>
>
> I have a USB hardware security key
> GoTrust Idem Key
> and while I can use it on linux in a chromium browser
> to login to some services -- you have to input a PIN
> number and then touch the key -- it seems to not work
> on OpenBSD
Dear list,
I have a USB hardware security key
GoTrust Idem Key
and while I can use it on linux in a chromium browser
to login to some services -- you have to input a PIN
number and then touch the key -- it seems to not work
on OpenBSD (neither chrome nor firefox).
Is this process supported on
On March 30, 2023 10:36:01 PM MDT, Kenneth Gober wrote:
>On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 12:37 PM Kihaguru Gathura
>wrote:
>
SNIP
>
>In general I prefer hardware RAID because it's more likely you'll be able
>to easily boot your
>system if the array is running in
Thanks for the info.
Regards,
Kihaguru.
On Fri, Mar 31, 2023 at 7:36 AM Kenneth Gober wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 12:37 PM Kihaguru Gathura <
> kihagurugath...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Is hardware RAID on Poweredge servers (T340, PERC H330 in particular)
>>
1 - 100 of 1019 matches
Mail list logo
