On 2014-09-07, Zoran Kolic wrote:
> Nowadays, does one need to use sysmerge at all?
yes.
to take a particular case which some readers here will need to know about:
if updating from code older than a month or two ago to 5.6 or -current, your
startup scripts will be semi-broken until you run sysme
On September 7, 2014 6:04:46 AM CEST, Zoran Kolic wrote:
>Nowadays, does one need to use sysmerge at all?
Yes. Some files are still actually merged, including for example
/etc/{master.passwd,group}
/Alexander
>
>Zoran
Nowadays, does one need to use sysmerge at all?
Zoran
Well as of the Aug28th snapshot it gets even easier, options are just -bdp.
Perfect for lazy typists like myself who also tend to fat-finger often ;)
Truly painless upgrade process.
On 8/28/2014 8:54 PM, Zoran Kolic wrote:
I upgraded to the 26 August snapshot (amd64) yesterday. I used:
sysmerge -x xetc56.tgz
and all went successfully.
Thanks.
But apparently the xetc set is going away very soon, too, so if you
wait a day or two you might avoid this complication alt
> > I upgraded to the 26 August snapshot (amd64) yesterday. I used:
> >
> >sysmerge -x xetc56.tgz
> >
> > and all went successfully.
Thanks.
> But apparently the xetc set is going away very soon, too, so if you
> wait a day or two you might avoid this complication altogether.
For some reason
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 2:33 PM, Scott Vanderbilt wrote:
> I upgraded to the 26 August snapshot (amd64) yesterday. I used:
>
>sysmerge -x xetc56.tgz
>
> and all went successfully.
I just upgraded to the same snapshot successfully. One further note:
if you've downloaded the sets and are upgrad
On 8/28/2014 8:13 AM, Zoran Kolic wrote:
How will update look like regarding sysmerge?
Lattest man for sysmerge(8) lost s flag. Since
I use X, it will still need -x xetc56.tgz?
I upgraded to the 26 August snapshot (amd64) yesterday. I used:
sysmerge -x xetc56.tgz
and all went successfully.
How will update look like regarding sysmerge?
Lattest man for sysmerge(8) lost s flag. Since
I use X, it will still need -x xetc56.tgz?
Best regards
Zoran
> The files http://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/snapshots/amd64/SHA256[.sig]
> don't have a hash for etc56.tgz and the etc56.tgz file is also older that
> the other base files. Is this an error or did I miss something?
etc.tgz is now inside the base, hiding inside /usr/share
The old files will sho
>> The files
>> http://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/snapshots/amd64/SHA256[.sig] don't
>> have a hash for etc56.tgz and the etc56.tgz file is also older that
>> the other base files. Is this an error or did I miss something?
>
> http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-cvs&m=140908438211799&w=2
Thanks, apparent
>> The files
>> http://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/snapshots/amd64/SHA256[.sig]
>> don't have a hash for etc56.tgz and the etc56.tgz file is also older
>> that
>> the other base files. Is this an error or did I miss something?
>
> the etc set goes away.
Thanks, that explains...
Kind regards,
Ma
On Wed, 27 Aug 2014 19:47:33 +0200, "Martijn Rijkeboer"
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The files
> http://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/snapshots/amd64/SHA256[.sig] don't
> have a hash for etc56.tgz and the etc56.tgz file is also older that
> the other base files. Is this an error or did I miss something?
http
mart...@bunix.org (Martijn Rijkeboer), 2014.08.27 (Wed) 19:47 (CEST):
> The files http://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/snapshots/amd64/SHA256[.sig]
> don't have a hash for etc56.tgz and the etc56.tgz file is also older that
> the other base files. Is this an error or did I miss something?
I thought
* Martijn Rijkeboer [2014-08-27 19:49]:
> The files http://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/snapshots/amd64/SHA256[.sig]
> don't have a hash for etc56.tgz and the etc56.tgz file is also older that
> the other base files. Is this an error or did I miss something?
the etc set goes away.
--
Henning Bra
Hi,
The files http://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/snapshots/amd64/SHA256[.sig]
don't have a hash for etc56.tgz and the etc56.tgz file is also older that
the other base files. Is this an error or did I miss something?
Kind regards,
Martijn Rijkeboer
16 matches
Mail list logo
