* Hari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-07-29 02:52]:
> problem. As an aside, would a different NIC solve this problem?
no. you have interrupt routing problems.
--
Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
BS Web Services, http://bsws.de
Full-Service ISP - Secure Hosting, Mail and DNS Servic
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 6:07 PM, Henning Brauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> if that still doesn't work... after install, at the boot> prompt, do
> "boot -c", and the the upcoming UKC> prompt do a "disable acpi"
> followed by "quit"
> once the system is running send dmesgs with and without acpi and
* Hari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-07-24 04:44]:
> On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 9:28 PM, Henning Brauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > ..., so please grab 4.4-beta fron
> > the snapshots dir on ftp and try that. if that still doesn't work, get
> > us full dmesgs as stuart already outlined.
>
> I tried wi
fxp0: warning: SCB timed out (x 3)
fxp0: config command timeout
- Forwarded message from Hari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
From: Hari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 09:46:28 +0900
To: Stuart Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: DHCP question
On Thu, Jul 2
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 9:28 PM, Henning Brauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ..., so please grab 4.4-beta fron
> the snapshots dir on ftp and try that. if that still doesn't work, get
> us full dmesgs as stuart already outlined.
I tried with OpenBSD4.4 beta (July 22, 2008) install. Still facing th
the amount of bad advice in this thread is incredible.
fxp0 works in bsd.rd, doesn't with bsd.
now what is the biggest difference that affects things like interrupt
routing between those? ight, ACPI.
lots of work has been done in the area, so please grab 4.4-beta fron
the snapshots dir on ftp
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 11:24:58AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
| > I checked dmesg and the output of 'ifconfig fxp0 up'. There is no
| > difference. The only time out messages listed in dmesg are from fxp0
| > (dmesg | grep -i time).
| >
| > How do I check the SCB thing with the bsd.rd kernel?
|
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Hari
Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2008 9:33 AM
To: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: DHCP question
fxp0: warning: SCB timed out (x 3)
Is 'SCB' a typo for 'SBC'?
I have SBC DSL, and did
On 2008-07-23, Hari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 6:16 PM, Robert Blacquiere
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I thing here is the real problem. It seems the fxp0 interface fails to
>> do some initializing. This probably results in the interface not being
>> fully enabled/up.
>>
On 2008-07-23, Tomas Bodzar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Eh,I missed something.Look at /etc/hosts and $hostname
> Why is localhost.WORKGROUP localhost in /etc/hosts and
that's based on the domain names you received by dhcp.
> mercury.my.domain in $hostname ?
and that's based on responses to ques
Almir Karic wrote"
>On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 04:33:27PM +0900, Hari wrote:
>> Hello. I just finished installing OpenBSD 4.3. The dhcp setup during
>> network configuration was fine, meaning, IP address was properly
>> assigned. I went ahead with the default values provided. However,
>> after rebooti
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 6:16 PM, Robert Blacquiere
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I thing here is the real problem. It seems the fxp0 interface fails to
> do some initializing. This probably results in the interface not being
> fully enabled/up.
>
> I'me not sure what SCB is but i think is related to
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 5:57 PM, Tony Abernethy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My (not so) humble opinion.
> /etc/hosts is the poor man's DNS -- what name to what IP
> ::1 localhost.foo.bar localhost
> 127.0.0.1 localhost.foo.bar localhost
> ::1 gw.foo.bar gw this-box
> 192.168.10.1gw this-box gw
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 5:48 PM, Almir Karic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> #ifconfig
>> lo0: flags-8049 mtu 33208
>> groups: lo
>> inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff00
>> inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128
>> inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x3
>> fxp0: flags-8049 mtu 3
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 05:19:26PM +0900, Hari wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 5:11 PM, Tomas Bodzar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Eh,I missed something.Look at /etc/hosts and $hostname
> > Why is localhost.WORKGROUP localhost in /etc/hosts and
> > mercury.my.domain in $hostname
>
> I have long
Hari wrote:
>On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 5:11 PM, Tomas Bodzar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Eh,I missed something.Look at /etc/hosts and $hostname
>> Why is localhost.WORKGROUP localhost in /etc/hosts and
>> mercury.my.domain in $hostname
>
>I have long suspected that this is the problem. I am a novi
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 04:33:27PM +0900, Hari wrote:
> Hello. I just finished installing OpenBSD 4.3. The dhcp setup during
> network configuration was fine, meaning, IP address was properly
> assigned. I went ahead with the default values provided. However,
> after rebooting post installation, I
Hari wrote:
>Hello. I just finished installing OpenBSD 4.3. The dhcp setup during
>network configuration was fine, meaning, IP address was properly
>assigned. I went ahead with the default values provided. However,
>after rebooting post installation, I am getting the following messages
>that seems
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 5:36 PM, Tony Abernethy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Silly question, but WHAT IP is actually assigned during install?
> I think something like ifconfig before the halt might work
> I assume you are installing from CD, not from network
> It might be as simple as a cable not c
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 05:08:31PM +0900, Hari wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 5:05 PM, Tomas Bodzar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Ok.So next step.
> >
> > $sudo ifconfig fxp0 dhcp up
> >
> > gives what?
>
> $sudo ifconfig fxp0 dhcp up
> ifconfig: dhcp: bad value
please try:
ps ax | grep dhcli
Hari wrote:
>On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 5:36 PM, Tony Abernethy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Silly question, but WHAT IP is actually assigned during install?
>> I think something like ifconfig before the halt might work
>> I assume you are installing from CD, not from network
>> It might be as simpl
did you try
'dhclient' ?
On Jul 23, 2008, at 1:08 PM, Hari wrote:
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 5:05 PM, Tomas Bodzar
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ok.So next step.
$sudo ifconfig fxp0 dhcp up
gives what?
$sudo ifconfig fxp0 dhcp up
ifconfig: dhcp: bad value
$
:-(
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 5:11 PM, Tomas Bodzar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Eh,I missed something.Look at /etc/hosts and $hostname
> Why is localhost.WORKGROUP localhost in /etc/hosts and
> mercury.my.domain in $hostname
I have long suspected that this is the problem. I am a novice at this
and I ha
Subject: DHCP question
Hello. I just finished installing OpenBSD 4.3. The dhcp setup during
network configuration was fine, meaning, IP address was properly
assigned. I went ahead with the default values provided. However,
after rebooting post installation, I am getting the following messages
that
Ok.So next step.
$sudo ifconfig fxp0 dhcp up
gives what?
-Original Message-
From: Hari [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2008 10:00 AM
To: Tomas Bodzar
Cc: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: DHCP question
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 4:53 PM, Tomas Bodzar <[EMAIL PROTEC
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 5:05 PM, Tomas Bodzar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok.So next step.
>
> $sudo ifconfig fxp0 dhcp up
>
> gives what?
$sudo ifconfig fxp0 dhcp up
ifconfig: dhcp: bad value
$
:-(
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 4:53 PM, Tomas Bodzar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> $man fxp
>
> timed out -> problem with network
>
> from your post :
> send_packet: Network is down
The network is good and working and this OpenBSD box is able to grab
an IP address during the initial network configuration
$man fxp
timed out -> problem with network
from your post :
send_packet: Network is down
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Hari
Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2008 9:33 AM
To: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: DHCP question
Hello. I just finis
Hello. I just finished installing OpenBSD 4.3. The dhcp setup during
network configuration was fine, meaning, IP address was properly
assigned. I went ahead with the default values provided. However,
after rebooting post installation, I am getting the following messages
that seems to point to a net
mgb wrote:
List,
I have a 4.1 GENERIC machine acting as DHCP server, serving out IP
addresses to 7 diskless client machines. Each client machine needs to
be pushed a different configuration file in order to start a process
once booted. There is a chance that any number of clients may be
re
On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 02:45:00PM +0100, mgb wrote:
> So if I defined a large pool of IP addresses in dhcpd.conf that
> would avert the problem described above, however I'm struggling to
> think of a solution on how would clients would request the correct
> configuration file? and how could I hand
List,
I have a 4.1 GENERIC machine acting as DHCP server, serving out IP
addresses to 7 diskless client machines. Each client machine needs to
be pushed a different configuration file in order to start a process
once booted. There is a chance that any number of clients may be
replaced at an
On 6/22/06, Peter Philipp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In my setup here at home the router changes addresses frequently (this has
many benefits, such as deterring people from using static ip's on the wifi)
however I'd like the DHCP clients to enjoy a rather ever changing address
as well, I've set t
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Is it not wanted that hosts on DHCP enjoy a random IP? Or is
> use of DHCP
> mainly for making configuration of hosts easier in a large network?
Does a random IP taste better to the interface card than a static one?
The *whole* point of DHCP is to make configuration o
Hi,
I'm wondering whether it's possible to have dhcpd give out addresses more
randomly and changing the addresses more for hosts that renew their lease.
I don't understand DHCP too well but I'm trying to make sense of the RFC.
Is it not wanted that hosts on DHCP enjoy a random IP? Or is use of
35 matches
Mail list logo
