In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Lars Noodin wrote:
>
> 2) Under what circumstances (generally) would one encounter a situation
> where it would strongly desirable to have a custom kernel?
When I happened to get an obsd kernel running on an 8M memory machine
by stripping out network support, unn
* Piotrek Kapczuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-01-18 17:13]:
> 2008/1/16, Henning Brauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > * Piotrek Kapczuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-01-16 18:59]:
> > > Hi
> > >
> > > 2008/1/16, Henning Brauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > > * Piotrek Kapczuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-01-16 15:5
2008/1/16, Henning Brauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> * Piotrek Kapczuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-01-16 18:59]:
> > Hi
> >
> > 2008/1/16, Henning Brauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > * Piotrek Kapczuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-01-16 15:51]:
> > > > 2008/1/16, Henning Brauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > > > *
You can tweak this in boot.conf, it's not necessary to alter the kernel
config.
Piotrek Kapczuk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 2008/1/16, Henning Brauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > * Lars Noodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-01-15 17:42]:
> > > What is recommended for using a second machine to compile a kern
On Jan 16, 2008 12:20 PM, Nick Holland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Richard Daemon wrote:
> ...
> > As for others saying 'why re-compile GENERIC', well, GENERIC is awesome
> in
> > itself and there is no need generally. But I think the reason for some
> > people is that they too like tweaking /usr
* Piotrek Kapczuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-01-16 18:59]:
> Hi
>
> 2008/1/16, Henning Brauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > * Piotrek Kapczuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-01-16 15:51]:
> > > 2008/1/16, Henning Brauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > > * Piotrek Kapczuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-01-16 14:18]:
> >
Hi
2008/1/16, Henning Brauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> * Piotrek Kapczuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-01-16 15:51]:
> > 2008/1/16, Henning Brauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > * Piotrek Kapczuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-01-16 14:18]:
> > > > Didn't know it is exactly the same as options. I found it in
>
> 2) Under what circumstances (generally) would one encounter a situation
> where it would strongly desirable to have a custom kernel?
An appletalk router.
-Bryan
Paul de Weerd wrote:
[...]
port in /etc/ttys (see ttys(5) for more info). But yeah, like Henning
said .. absolutely no need to build a new kernel.
Definitely not worth the effort just to change the console speed.
I do custom kernels to build a ramdisk kernel that has some special
application
Henning Brauer wrote:
* Piotrek Kapczuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-01-16 12:05]:
2008/1/16, Henning Brauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
* Lars Noodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-01-15 17:42]:
What is recommended for using a second machine to compile a kernel for
the soekris?
nothing. there is no need to
Richard Daemon wrote:
...
> As for others saying 'why re-compile GENERIC', well, GENERIC is awesome in
> itself and there is no need generally. But I think the reason for some
> people is that they too like tweaking /usr/src/sys/conf/GENERIC &
> /usr/src/sys/arch/$ARCH/conf/GENERIC to remove any un
Hi
2008/1/16, Richard Daemon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Jan 16, 2008 9:42 AM, Piotrek Kapczuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > 2008/1/16, Henning Brauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > * Piotrek Kapczuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-01-16 14:18]:
> > > > Didn't know it is exactly the same as options. I fo
On Jan 16, 2008 9:42 AM, Piotrek Kapczuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/1/16, Henning Brauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > * Piotrek Kapczuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-01-16 14:18]:
> > > Didn't know it is exactly the same as options. I found it in
> > > flashboot. I'll look more in to other flashb
* Piotrek Kapczuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-01-16 15:51]:
> 2008/1/16, Henning Brauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > * Piotrek Kapczuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-01-16 14:18]:
> > > Didn't know it is exactly the same as options. I found it in
> > > flashboot. I'll look more in to other flashboot customi
2008/1/16, Henning Brauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> * Piotrek Kapczuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-01-16 14:18]:
> > Didn't know it is exactly the same as options. I found it in
> > flashboot. I'll look more in to other flashboot customisations. Thanks
> > for pointing this out.
>
> flash boot and teh
* Piotrek Kapczuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-01-16 14:18]:
> Didn't know it is exactly the same as options. I found it in
> flashboot. I'll look more in to other flashboot customisations. Thanks
> for pointing this out.
flash boot and teh like are obsolete ways to complicate your life.
--
Henni
2008/1/16, Henning Brauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> * Piotrek Kapczuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-01-16 12:05]:
> > 2008/1/16, Henning Brauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > * Lars Noodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-01-15 17:42]:
> > > > What is recommended for using a second machine to compile a kernel for
>
* Paul de Weerd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-01-16 13:35]:
> | 2) Under what circumstances (generally) would one encounter a situation
> | where it would strongly desirable to have a custom kernel?
>
> I think the goal is "never". Under no circumstances *should* it be
> 'strongly desirable' to have a
On 1/16/08, Lars NoodC)n <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 1) Should anything be done to the GENERIC kernel's run time
> configuration then to improve performance, reduce system requirements or
> otherwise prevent it from making beer go flat?
nope. I've been running a couple of net4501 (100MHz/64MB RAM
On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 02:16:40PM +0200, Lars Nood??n wrote:
| > ... (see ttys(5) for more info). But yeah, like Henning
| > said .. absolutely no need to build a new kernel.
|
| 1) Should anything be done to the GENERIC kernel's run time
| configuration then to improve performance, reduce system
Paul de Weerd wrote:
> ...
> Don't forget to change the speed on the getty running on the serial
> port in /etc/ttys ...
to summarize for the sake of the archives:
/etc/boot.conf:
stty com0 38400
set tty com0
/etc/ttys:
tty00 "/usr/libexec/getty std.38400" vt220on
On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 12:23:19PM +0100, Henning Brauer wrote:
| > IMHO every embedded device should have console speed synced between
| > bios and the kernel. These options are very helpful.
I completely agree with the first part here. BIOS, kernel and console
speed should be the same across the
* Piotrek Kapczuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-01-16 12:05]:
> 2008/1/16, Henning Brauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > * Lars Noodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-01-15 17:42]:
> > > What is recommended for using a second machine to compile a kernel for
> > > the soekris?
> >
> > nothing. there is no need to c
On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 12:01:28 +0100, Piotrek Kapczuk wrote:
>2008/1/16, Henning Brauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> * Lars Noodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-01-15 17:42]:
>> > What is recommended for using a second machine to compile a kernel for
>> > the soekris?
>>
>> nothing. there is no need to compi
2008/1/16, Henning Brauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> * Lars Noodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-01-15 17:42]:
> > What is recommended for using a second machine to compile a kernel for
> > the soekris?
>
> nothing. there is no need to compile a kernel for the soekris. further,
> there is no use in compili
* Lars Noodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-01-15 17:42]:
> What is recommended for using a second machine to compile a kernel for
> the soekris?
nothing. there is no need to compile a kernel for the soekris. further,
there is no use in compiling a !GENERIC kernel for soekris either.
(ok, rare excep
Richard Daemon wrote:
> Are you compiling from i386 or amd64, or other? Is it -current, -stable or
> -release that you're compiling?
-stable
on i386
OpenBSD compilorama 4.2 GENERIC#375 i386
> Personally, I just run 4.2-stable on my Soekris & Wrap boxes as well as my
Yeah the regular installatio
On Jan 15, 2008 11:34 AM, Lars NoodC)n <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What is recommended for using a second machine to compile a kernel for
> the soekris?
>
> I would like to build a streamlined kernel to run on a net4801. I'm
> running into problems though.
>
> 'make depend' runs without error, b
take a look at one of the stripped "embedded" OpenBSD builds out there,
flashdist or flashboot.
diana
What is recommended for using a second machine to compile a kernel for
the soekris?
I would like to build a streamlined kernel to run on a net4801. I'm
running into problems though.
'make depend' runs without error, but then 'make' comes up with many
errors like the following:
agp_ali.o(
30 matches
Mail list logo
