> Well, you'd be wrong. Development is just starting.
my mistake, sorry about that. In general, I was being
relative with "dating" it...I just remembered that
sometime between the release of 3.7 and 3.8 that the
beginnings of support was being discussed. I could be
wrong there too.
I am glad t
> so, I know ACPI at this point in OpenBSD has just
> been added.
Well, you'd be wrong. Development is just starting. Cautiously,
becaseu we don't want to end up in the same mess as other projects
did.
We'll see where it goes...
On 12/9/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> so, I know ACPI at this point in OpenBSD has just
> been added. I just installed 3.8 on my Fujitsu
> Lifebook P7010D and it doesn't have APM as far as
> I can determine, just ACPI, which seems to be a
> growing trend in new laptops.
>
> an
> Proving a dmesg to the list would be a good start
gladly.
OpenBSD 3.8 (GENERIC) #1: Fri Dec 9 11:16:35 CST 2005
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/NIBBLER
cpu0: Intel(R) Pentium(R) M processor 1.10GHz ("GenuineIntel" 686-class) 1.10
GHz
cpu0:
FPU,V86,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,MCE,CX8,
This is still heavily under development and is by no means ready for
consumption. We could use some help so I encourage people with
programming skills and who are familiar with ACPI to contact me off
list. I'll put you to work :-)
/marco
On Dec 9, 2005, at 11:13 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
*ducks*
so, I know ACPI at this point in OpenBSD has just
been added. I just installed 3.8 on my Fujitsu
Lifebook P7010D and it doesn't have APM as far as
I can determine, just ACPI, which seems to be a
growing trend in new laptops.
anyway, when booting, dmesg spits out a lot of stuff
about acpi
6 matches
Mail list logo
