Re: X package sets not listed in MD5

2007-03-02 Thread Antti Harri
On Fri, 2 Mar 2007, Stuart Henderson wrote: MD5 is built as part of the main OS release (/usr/src/etc/Makefile); X is built separately. I know but appending the information to the existing files would be great. Or even with separate files as Matthew suggested. Another possibility is to have di

Re: X package sets not listed in MD5

2007-03-02 Thread Matthew R. Dempsky
On Fri, Mar 02, 2007 at 01:01:22PM -0600, Matthew R. Dempsky wrote: > What about a patch like this? (Just a proof of concept; completely > untested.) Sorry, copy/paste mangled the tabs in that. It also occured to me the sort invocations are probably unnecessary. Index: Makefile

Re: X package sets not listed in MD5

2007-03-02 Thread Matthew R. Dempsky
On Fri, Mar 02, 2007 at 02:55:25PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote: > MD5 is built as part of the main OS release (/usr/src/etc/Makefile); > X is built separately. What about a patch like this? (Just a proof of concept; completely untested.) Index: Makefile ===

Re: X package sets not listed in MD5

2007-03-02 Thread Flying Walrus
Please feel free to flame me over this, but... Is there a good reason not to have the X build generate checksums? in a seperate file? Ben On Fri, 2 Mar 2007 14:55:25 +, Stuart Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 2007/03/02 11:42, Andris wrote: >> AFAIK, it isn't answered yet in the FA

Re: X package sets not listed in MD5

2007-03-02 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2007/03/02 11:42, Andris wrote: > AFAIK, it isn't answered yet in the FAQ, I'am suggesting that. MD5 is built as part of the main OS release (/usr/src/etc/Makefile); X is built separately.

Re: X package sets not listed in MD5

2007-03-02 Thread Andrés
AFAIK, it isn't answered yet in the FAQ, I'am suggesting that. On 3/2/07, Antti Harri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Fri, 2 Mar 2007, Andris wrote: > IMHO, this should be answered in the FAQ. > > On 3/2/07, Antti Harri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> What's the reason for not providing MD5 sums >

Re: X package sets not listed in MD5

2007-03-02 Thread Antti Harri
On Fri, 2 Mar 2007, Andris wrote: > IMHO, this should be answered in the FAQ. > > On 3/2/07, Antti Harri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> What's the reason for not providing MD5 sums >> of X*.tgz sets in the MD5-file of release directories? Hi, I guess my googling and other searching skills sucks

Re: X package sets not listed in MD5

2007-03-02 Thread Andrés
IMHO, this should be answered in the FAQ. On 3/2/07, Antti Harri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello, What's the reason for not providing MD5 sums of X*.tgz sets in the MD5-file of release directories? I found only one thread [1] regarding this question from the archives and it didn't answer it r

X package sets not listed in MD5

2007-03-02 Thread Antti Harri
Hello, What's the reason for not providing MD5 sums of X*.tgz sets in the MD5-file of release directories? I found only one thread [1] regarding this question from the archives and it didn't answer it really. I want to be able to see if the file has been transferred correctly and I also want to