> > Right now my box is doing ~28,000pps per direction per interface (out
> > public, in public, out internal, in internal), totalling around
> > 112kpps. It doesn't seem to want to go any higher than that. I've just
> > tried moving the internal connection off of the dualport PCI-X card
> > and on
* dormando <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-10-21 01:08]:
> Did you make any other configuration changes?
>
> Right now my box is doing ~28,000pps per direction per interface (out
> public, in public, out internal, in internal), totalling around
> 112kpps. It doesn't seem to want to go any higher than th
Did you make any other configuration changes?
Right now my box is doing ~28,000pps per direction per interface (out
public, in public, out internal, in internal), totalling around
112kpps. It doesn't seem to want to go any higher than that. I've just
tried moving the internal connection off of the
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of dormando
Sent: Monday, October 17, 2005 8:29 PM
To: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Very high interrupts on a supermicro machine.
Hey all,
Attached is a dmesg of one of a pair of supermicro based firewalls I
recently bought. I had set them up as a CARP/pfsync r
t; if (!(ifq)->ifq_congestion) \
> > if_congestion(ifq); \
> >
> > that means the congestion flag will never be set.
> > or you add a return; as first statement in if_congestion() in if.c.
> >
> >
> >
f_congestion() in if.c.
>
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > On Behalf Of dormando
> > Sent: Monday, October 17, 2005 8:29 PM
> > To: misc@openbsd.org
> > Subject: Very high interrupts on a superm
\
>
> that means the congestion flag will never be set.
> or you add a return; as first statement in if_congestion() in if.c.
>
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > On Behalf Of dormando
> > Sent: Monday,
Sent: Monday, October 17, 2005 8:29 PM
> To: misc@openbsd.org
> Subject: Very high interrupts on a supermicro machine.
>
> Hey all,
>
> Attached is a dmesg of one of a pair of supermicro based firewalls I
> recently bought. I had set them up as a CARP/pfsync redundant pair of
On 10/17/05, dormando <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey all,
[...]
My apologies for mime'ing the dmesg :( I post here once a year or so.
It looks like the latest snapshot from the FTP does a lot better with
interrupts (about 150k pps before getting into the danger area), and
interrupts never go a
Hey all,
Attached is a dmesg of one of a pair of supermicro based firewalls I
recently bought. I had set them up as a CARP/pfsync redundant pair of
frontend firewalls for our network. However, after they reached 15,000
interrupts per second (~ 110 megabits of our site traffic), they passed 90%
CPU
10 matches
Mail list logo
