On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 12:22 PM, Richard Thornton
wrote:
> OpenBSD 5.0-current (GENERIC) #65: Thu Nov 3 00:58:36 MDT 2011
>
PKG_PATH=ftp://openbsd.mirror.frontiernet.net/pub/OpenBSD/5.0/packages/sparc6
4/
You're trying to use -stable packages on a -current system?
Re-install the OS, and don't
OpenBSD 5.0-current (GENERIC) #65: Thu Nov 3 00:58:36 MDT 2011
Welcome to OpenBSD: The proactively secure Unix-like operating system.
Please use the sendbug(1) utility to report bugs in the system.
Before reporting a bug, please try to reproduce it with the latest
version of the code. With bug
Incorrect.
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012, Richard Thornton wrote:
> keeps looking for library c.60.1 which does not exist in a vanilla 5.0
> install.
>
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 10:38 PM, Nick Holland
> wrote:
>
>> On 12/19/11 14:39, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>> > On 2011-12-19, Richard Thornton wr
keeps looking for library c.60.1 which does not exist in a vanilla 5.0
install.
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 10:38 PM, Nick Holland
wrote:
> On 12/19/11 14:39, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > On 2011-12-19, Richard Thornton wrote:
> >> Do a simple clean 5.0 install. One would assume any browser packa
Complete lack of specifics.
I'm ignoring.
Nick.
On 01/13/2012 01:49 PM, Richard Thornton wrote:
I a clean 5.0 install on my sun blade today; I setup the ports folder as
the documentation says to do, and I setup my PKG_PATH variable using a
Chicago mirror; trying to add via the command pkg_add
I a clean 5.0 install on my sun blade today; I setup the ports folder as
the documentation says to do, and I setup my PKG_PATH variable using a
Chicago mirror; trying to add via the command pkg_add -i gnome-session
yields immediate errors looking for a c library level 60 or 61, not sure
which, bu
On 12/20/2011 07:49 AM, Richard Thornton wrote:
I used the advice from the blog called gab software. Perhaps he was
wrong. I am willing to reinstall. I have no personal data to lose
on this old box.
What was deficient on the official documentation?
Nick.
there is an excellent blog called "www.openbsd.org/faq/". Check out the
advice there. It's pretty awesome.
On 2011 Dec 20 (Tue) at 07:49:11 -0500 (-0500), Richard Thornton wrote:
:I used the advice from the blog called gab software. Perhaps he was wrong.
I am willing to reinstall. I have no
I used the advice from the blog called gab software. Perhaps he was wrong. I
am willing to reinstall. I have no personal data to lose on this old box.
Nick Holland wrote:
>On 12/19/11 14:39, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>> On 2011-12-19, Richard Thornton wrote:
>>> Do a simple clean 5.0 install
On 12/19/11 14:39, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2011-12-19, Richard Thornton wrote:
>> Do a simple clean 5.0 install. One would assume any browser package in the
>> packages folder would install. None do for me on sparc, but with a clean
>> 4.9 install all 4.9 packages install. I am not a Unix s
On Mon, 19 Dec 2011, Christiano F. Haesbaert wrote:
On 19 December 2011 16:20, Richard Thornton
wrote:
Do a simple clean 5.0 install. One would assume any browser package in the
packages folder would install. None do for me on sparc, but with a clean
4.9 install all 4.9 packages install. I a
On 2011-12-19, Richard Thornton wrote:
> Do a simple clean 5.0 install. One would assume any browser package in the
> packages folder would install. None do for me on sparc, but with a clean
> 4.9 install all 4.9 packages install. I am not a Unix specialist by any
> means but I do know how to ty
Richard Thornton writes:
> I upgraded my sun blade 100 from 4.9 to 5.0; no issues but, it appears
> that the packages in 4.9 are not always upgradeable to those in 5.0 and
> most packages in 5.0 fail to install due to library dependencies.
This sounds suspicously like you're mixing base and p
On 19 December 2011 16:20, Richard Thornton
wrote:
> Do a simple clean 5.0 install. One would assume any browser package in the
> packages folder would install. None do for me on sparc, but with a clean
> 4.9 install all 4.9 packages install. I am not a Unix specialist by any
> means but I do kn
On 19 December 2011 16:02, Richard Thornton
wrote:
> I upgraded my sun blade 100 from 4.9 to 5.0; no issues but, it appears
> that the packages in 4.9 are not always upgradeable to those in 5.0 and
> most packages in 5.0 fail to install due to library dependencies. one
> would assume all 5.0 pac
Do a simple clean 5.0 install. One would assume any browser package in the
packages folder would install. None do for me on sparc, but with a clean
4.9 install all 4.9 packages install. I am not a Unix specialist by any
means but I do know how to type pkg_add .
On Dec 19, 2011 1:15 PM, "Daniel Bo
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 01:02:59PM -0500, Richard Thornton wrote:
> it appears
> that the packages in 4.9 are not always upgradeable to those in 5.0 and
> most packages in 5.0 fail to install due to library dependencies.
What?
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by
I upgraded my sun blade 100 from 4.9 to 5.0; no issues but, it appears
that the packages in 4.9 are not always upgradeable to those in 5.0 and
most packages in 5.0 fail to install due to library dependencies. one
would assume all 5.0 packages are created using the dev tools from 5.0 but
this does
Hi Misc@,
I'm planning to upgrade an 4.9 AMD64-stable to 5.0. I've read FAQ Upgrade
Guide, and I think there are no potential PITA. But I'd love to hear from
others who has experience upgrading 4.9-stable to 5.0 AMD64.
The server is a;
OpenBSD 4.9-stable (kernel-amd64) #1: Sun May 22 05:08
19 matches
Mail list logo
