OpenBSD 5.0-current (GENERIC) #65: Thu Nov 3 00:58:36 MDT 2011
Welcome to OpenBSD: The proactively secure Unix-like operating system.
Please use the sendbug(1) utility to report bugs in the system.
Before reporting a bug, please try to reproduce it with the latest
version of the code. With bug reports, please try to ensure that
enough information to reproduce the problem is enclosed, and if a
known fix for it exists, include that as well.
$
$
$
$ cat rprofile.txt
# $OpenBSD: dot.profile,v 1.9 2010/12/13 12:54:31 millert Exp $
#
# sh/ksh initialization
PATH=/sbin:/usr/sbin:/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/X11R6/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin
export PATH
: ${HOME='/root'}
export HOME
PKG_PATH=
ftp://openbsd.mirror.frontiernet.net/pub/OpenBSD/5.0/packages/sparc64/
export PKG_PATH
umask 022
case "$-" in
*i*) # interactive shell
if [ -x /usr/bin/tset ]; then
if [ X"$XTERM_VERSION" = X"" ]; then
eval `/usr/bin/tset -sQ '-munknown:?vt220' $TERM`
else
eval `/usr/bin/tset -IsQ '-munknown:?vt220' $TERM`
fi
fi
;;
esac
$login as: rthornto
rthornto@68.197.72.59's password:
OpenBSD 5.0-current (GENERIC) #65: Thu Nov 3 00:58:36 MDT 2011
Welcome to OpenBSD: The proactively secure Unix-like operating system.
Please use the sendbug(1) utility to report bugs in the system.
Before reporting a bug, please try to reproduce it with the latest
version of the code. With bug reports, please try to ensure that
enough information to reproduce the problem is enclosed, and if a
known fix for it exists, include that as well.
$
$
$
$ cat rprofile.txt
# $OpenBSD: dot.profile,v 1.9 2010/12/13 12:54:31 millert Exp $
#
# sh/ksh initialization
PATH=/sbin:/usr/sbin:/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/X11R6/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin
export PATH
: ${HOME='/root'}
export HOME
PKG_PATH=
ftp://openbsd.mirror.frontiernet.net/pub/OpenBSD/5.0/packages/sparc64/
export PKG_PATH
umask 022
case "$-" in
*i*) # interactive shell
if [ -x /usr/bin/tset ]; then
if [ X"$XTERM_VERSION" = X"" ]; then
eval `/usr/bin/tset -sQ '-munknown:?vt220' $TERM`
else
eval `/usr/bin/tset -IsQ '-munknown:?vt220' $TERM`
fi
fi
;;
esac
$ clear
$ ls
gnome-session.txt rprofile.txt
$ cat gnome-session.txt
| /usr/lib/libc.so.61.0 (system): bad major
| /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.53.0 (system): bad major
$
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 2:55 PM, Bryan Irvine <sparcta...@gmail.com> wrote:
> By lack of info they mean you aren't providing near enough to come to
> any conclusion at all.
>
> Please paste the output from the following:
>
> dmesg, echo $PKG_PATH, pkg_info, pkg_add -i gnome-session
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 11:48 AM, Richard Thornton
> <thornton.rich...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > keeps looking for library c.60.1 which does not exist in a vanilla 5.0
> > install.
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 10:38 PM, Nick Holland
> > <n...@holland-consulting.net>wrote:
> >
> >> On 12/19/11 14:39, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> >> > On 2011-12-19, Richard Thornton <thornton.rich...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> Do a simple clean 5.0 install. One would assume any browser package
> in
> >> the
> >> >> packages folder would install. None do for me on sparc, but with a
> clean
> >> >> 4.9 install all 4.9 packages install. I am not a Unix specialist by
> any
> >> >> means but I do know how to type pkg_add .
> >> >
> >> > Please send a mail to ports@ detailing exactly what you are doing
> (what
> >> > you're typing, what PKG_PATH is set to if you're using it, the
> contents
> >> > of /etc/pkg.conf if you're using that) and what output you see.
> >> >
> >> > This is the first I've heard of any major problem with 5.0 release
> >> > packages on any arch, if there is a problem obviously we need to know
> >> > what went wrong so we can avoid it happening in future, but before
> >> > digging into that we need to first rule out incorrect procedure.
> >>
> >> Don't bother, he's doing something very wrong. This is a PEBKAC
> >> diagnostic issue, not an OpenBSD issue.
> >>
> >> Just happened to have a blade100 (the machine he named) sitting here,
> >> just loaded it up, but not into production yet, so blew it away (it was
> >> at -current, of course) and did exactly what he said:
> >>
> >> * simple 5.0 install from CD (only non-default was to use ntpd)
> >> * set PKG_PATH to my local mirror
> >> * pkg_add xxxterm
> >> * pkg_add firefox36 (didn't seem to be newer ones for sparc64)
> >> * pkg_add dillo
> >> * pkg_add conkeror
> >> * pkg_add midori
> >> * pkg_add kazehakase
> >> * pkg_add links+2.2p2
> >> * pkg_add elinks
> >> * pkg_add w3m-0.5.3
> >> * pkg_add links FINALLY! an error! conflict with links+. Package
> >> management system worked fine :)
> >>
> >> Other than links after links+, all installed fine.
> >>
> >> Starting them all at the same time on a blade100 with only 512M RAM was
> >> not my most productive move, but they all seemed to be trying to work,
> >> until something ran out of something and X blew me back to a command
> >> prompt :)
> >>
> >> (I gotta play with some of these alternate browsers)
> >>
> >> Personally, I think he's screwing up between sparc and sparc64. He's
> >> being VERY sloppy with the platform name_s_ in his posting, so I suspect
> >> it is safe to assume he's doing that elsewhere.
> >>
> >> Nick.
