On 2011-06-16 14:43, Peter Hallin wrote:
> On 2011-06-15 22:40, Jonathan Gray wrote:
> >
> > Yes this seems low indeed. You could try use rdomains and route exec
> > with a cable between the two ports to make packets go over the interfaces
> > if you don't have another host with 10G interfaces.
>
On 2011-06-16 14:43, Peter Hallin wrote:
>
> I didn't get that far. When connecting the two ports to each other (tried
> with a couple of TP cables) I only get 1000baseT full-duplex on ix0 and
> ix1.
Nevermind that. After a reboot with the cables connected the interfaces
show up as 10GbaseT full-
On 2011-06-15 22:40, Jonathan Gray wrote:
>
> Yes this seems low indeed. You could try use rdomains and route exec
> with a cable between the two ports to make packets go over the interfaces
> if you don't have another host with 10G interfaces.
I didn't get that far. When connecting the two port
On 2011-06-15 13:58, FRLinux wrote:
> Just out of curiosity, which iperf settings did you use?
Just standard TCP, iperf -c hostname
>
> I know this is on a Linux box, but just out of interest, I get full
> speed there:
Yeah, sure it works on Linux, but that's not what I'm running. Otherwise
it'
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 11:40 AM, Peter Hallin wrote:
> It only got up to about 450 Mbit/s (standard TCP iperf test) and there
> was an unbalance between ix0 and ix1 when it came to interrupts. ix1
> only got up to 4000 intr/s whereas ix1 got up to 13000 intr/s (when
> monitoring live with systat
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 12:40:32PM +0200, Peter Hallin wrote:
> On 2011-06-15 04:26, Jonathan Gray wrote:
> > Claudio has recently synced ix to a newer version of the Intel code,
> > if you can try again with -current this should work.
>
> Great, thanks. I tried it out today, but the performance w
On 2011-06-15 04:26, Jonathan Gray wrote:
> Claudio has recently synced ix to a newer version of the Intel code,
> if you can try again with -current this should work.
Great, thanks. I tried it out today, but the performance wasn't exactly
what I had expected.
This is a dual port card, so I bridg
Claudio has recently synced ix to a newer version of the Intel code,
if you can try again with -current this should work.
Thanks, I tried that and got the routing table, however still no packets
coming through. //Peter
> sounds like rDNS delay.
>
> retry with arp -an and netstat -rn
>
> /Pete
sounds like rDNS delay.
retry with arp -an and netstat -rn
/Pete
On 16. mars 2011, at 16.33, Peter Hallin wrote:
> Hello again and thanks for the patch.
>
> I started out with a fresh install of 4.8 GENERIC (amd64, MP), applied the
> patch and recompiled the kernel. The line numbers were not c
Hello again and thanks for the patch.
I started out with a fresh install of 4.8 GENERIC (amd64, MP), applied the
patch and recompiled the kernel. The line numbers were not correct, but
otherwise it looked the same.
After reboot dmesg showed that the cards now have been found and I have the ix
int
On Wed, 16 Mar 2011 06:26:20 +1100
Jonathan Gray wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 06:56:24PM +0100, roberth wrote:
> >
> > And this one here?
>
> This should be handled by the default case as the
> start of the function, already.
Sure, it is, the freebsd driver is checking this twice, my bad.
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 06:56:24PM +0100, roberth wrote:
>
> And this one here?
This should be handled by the default case as the
start of the function, already.
>
> Index: ixgbe_82599.c
> ===
> RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/dev/pci/ixgbe
On Wed, 16 Mar 2011 04:39:21 +1100
Jonathan Gray wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 05:02:38PM +0100, Peter Hallin wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > After reading the manpages for ix(4) "Intel 82598/82599 PCI Express
> > 10Gb Ethernet device",
> > I drew the conclusion that the X520-T2
> > (http://www.in
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 05:02:38PM +0100, Peter Hallin wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After reading the manpages for ix(4) "Intel 82598/82599 PCI Express 10Gb
> Ethernet device",
> I drew the conclusion that the X520-T2
> (http://www.intel.com/Products/Server/Adapters/esa-x520-t2/ethernet-esa-x520-
> t2-ove
Hi all,
After reading the manpages for ix(4) "Intel 82598/82599 PCI Express 10Gb
Ethernet device",
I drew the conclusion that the X520-T2
(http://www.intel.com/Products/Server/Adapters/esa-x520-t2/ethernet-esa-x520-
t2-overview.htm)
would also be supported by the driver, so we took a shot and boug
16 matches
Mail list logo
